Technical Papers
Jul 20, 2021

Prioritization Framework for Rockfall Countermeasures for Rock-Cut Slopes for Rural Roads

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 10

Abstract

Rockfalls can have devastating consequences to motorists and road facilities. Over time, countermeasures have been considered technically viable to mitigate these events. Rockfall hazard assessment is one of the options to identify feasible countermeasures, including designs, based on engineering-related data analysis. Of the attempts to enhance the fundamentals and practices of efficient and reliable rockfall hazard assessment, a few of the past contributions were devoted to developing holistic approaches that can identify the best design option by prioritizing technically viable countermeasures. These measures are based on multidimensional aspects such as construction cost and time, complexity, safety, and aesthetics. This paper presents a novel holistic prioritization framework to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of feasible design options for rockfall countermeasures, focusing on rural local road rockfall applications. The framework is composed of three main steps, including rockfall hazard assessment, prioritization, and sensitivity analysis. The processes of the proposed framework are well-demonstrated in this paper through an actual case study in West Virginia. The unique feature of the framework lies in a sensitivity analysis that provides decision-makers with a statistical inference of the confidence level in choosing the top-ranked design option. This paper also presents a synthesis of the evaluation criteria necessary to prioritize the countermeasure design options identified through a rockfall hazard assessment. Herein, the applicability of the sensitivity analysis approach was further expanded to quantitative measures obtained through standard scaling techniques.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Available data sets include (1) raw data collected for the evaluation criteria and AHP and (2) all data sets used to generate the tables and figures in the paper.

References

Anderson, D. A., D. L. Beckstrand, E. Bilderback, E. Cuelho, and E. Garich. 2018 “Proactive management of landslide- and rockfall-prone slopes: A new program for federal land management agencies.” Geo-Strata—Geo Inst. ASCE 22 (3): 50.
Andrew, R. D., R. Bartingale, and H. Hume. 2011. Context sensitive rock slope design solutions. FHWA-CFL/TD-11-002. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Crosta, G. B., F. Agliardi, P. Frattini, and S. Lari. 2015. “Key issues in rock fall modeling, hazard and risk assessment for rockfall protection.” In Engineering geology for society and territory, 43–58. Berlin: Springer.
Fell, R., J. Corominas, C. Bonnard, L. Cascini, E. Leroi, and W. Z. Savage. 2008. “On behalf of the JTC-1 Joint Technical Committee on Landslides and Engineered Slopes (2008) guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning.” Eng. Geol. 102 (3–4): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.022.
Fell, R., K. K. Ho, S. Lacasse, and E. Leroi. 2005. “A framework for landslide risk assessment and management.” In Landslide risk management, edited by O. Hungr, R. Fell, R. Couture, and E. Eberhardt, 3–25. London: Taylor & Francis.
Frattini, P., G. B. Crosta, and A. Valagussa. 2014. “Rockfall runout modelling for hazard characterization and countermeasure design in urban area.” In Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment, 385–391. Berlin: Springer.
Granger, A. B., S. J. Deeck, J. P. Jamerson, and E. M. Zamiskie. 2019. “Rockfall in New Jersey: A proactive and collaborative approach.” In Geo-Congress 2019: Engineering geology, site characterization, and geophysics, 266–279. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Grošic, M., Z. Arbanas, and D. Udovic. 2009. “Designing and constructing rockfall barriers—Experiences in Republic of Croatia.” In Proc., ISRM Regional Symp. EUROCK 2009. Int. Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 703–708. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Guzzetti, F., and P. Reichenbach. 2010. “Rockfalls and their hazard.” In Tree rings and natural hazards, 129–137. Berlin: Springer.
Huber, R., and M. J. Woodard. 2018. “Design and construction considerations for innovative rockfall protection systems.” In Proc., 69th Highway Geology Symp. Geology, 154–162. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.
Kwak, S. G., and J. H. Kim. 2017. “Central limit theorem: The cornerstone of modern statistics.” Korean J. Anesthesiol. 70 (2): 144. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144.
Lambert, S., and F. Bourrier. 2013. “Design of rockfall protection embankments: A review.” Eng. Geol. 154 (Apr): 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.012.
Lan, H., C. D. Martin, and C. H. Lim. 2007. “Rockfall analyst: A GIS extension for three-dimensional and spatially distributed rockfall hazard modeling.” Comput. Geosci. 33 (2): 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2006.05.013.
Maerz, N. H., A. M. Youssef, B. Pradhan, and A. Bulkhi. 2015. “Remediation and mitigation strategies for rockfall hazards along the highways of Fayfa Mountain, Jazan Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.” Arabian J. Geosci. 8 (5): 2633–2651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1423-x.
Mavrouli, O., and J. Corominas. 2018. “TXT-tool 4.034-1.1: Quantitative rockfall risk assessment for roadways and railways.” In Landslide dynamics: ISDR-ICL landslide interactive teaching tools, 509–519. Berlin: Springer.
Mignelli, C., S. Pomarico, and D. Peila. 2013. “Use of multicriteria model to compare devices for the protection of roads against rockfall.” Environ. Eng. Geosci. 19 (3): 289–302. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.19.3.289.
Nippon Koei. 2007. The study on risk management for sediment-related disaster on selected national highways in the Republic of the Philippines. Tokyo: Japan International Cooperation Agency.
Ortiz, R., L. Castro, and S. Marambio. 2019. “A methodology for semi-quantitative analysis of rockfall hazards and cost-benefit-based mitigation design.” In Proc., 14th Int. Congress on Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering (ISRM 2019). London: CRC Press.
Pine, R. J., and W. J. Roberds. 2005. “A risk-based approach for the design of rock slopes subject to multiple failure modes—Illustrated by a case study in Hong Kong.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 42 (2): 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.09.014.
Popescu, M. E., A. C. Trandafir, and A. Federico. 2015. “Risk assessment of slope instability related geohazards.” In Numerical methods for reliability and safety assessment, 243–269. Berlin: Springer.
Pradhan, B., and A. M. Fanos. 2017. “Rockfall hazard assessment: An overview.” In Laser scanning applications in landslide assessment, 299–322. Berlin: Springer.
Raetzo, H., O. Lateltin, D. Bollinger, and J. Tripet. 2002. “Hazard assessment in Switzerland—Codes of practice for mass movements.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 61 (3): 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-002-0163-4.
Robinson, E. L. 2016. Data analysis for scientists and engineers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Strada, C., D. Bertolo, V. Mair, and M. Paganone. 2020. “Key elements to assess proposals for rockfall risk mitigation in the context of a technical and economic feasibility project—The experience of two alpine Italian regions.” In Proc., EGU General Assembly Conf. Abstracts. Munich, Germany: European Geosciences Union. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-5753.
Toe, D., A. Mentani, L. Govoni, F. Bourrier, G. Gottardi, and S. Lambert. 2018. “Introducing meta-models for a more efficient hazard mitigation strategy with rockfall protection barriers.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 51 (4): 1097–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1394-9.
Tong, X., and Z. Zhang. 2012. “Diagnostics of robust growth curve modeling using student’s t distribution.” Multivariate Behav. Res. 47 (4): 493–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.692614.
Triantaphyllou, E., and A. Sánchez. 1997. “A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multicriteria decision-making methods.” Decis. Sci. 28 (1): 151–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01306.x.
Verma, A. K., S. Sardana, P. Sharma, L. Dinpuia, and T. N. Singh. 2019. “Investigation of rockfall-prone road cut slope near Lengpui Airport, Mizoram, India.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 11 (1): 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.07.007.
Volkwein, A., K. Schellenberg, V. Labiouse, F. Agliardi, F. Berger, F. Bourrier, and M. Jaboyedoff. 2011. “Rockfall characterisation and structural protection—A review.” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 11: 2617–2651. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-2617-2011.
Yoon, Y., W. Kang, and M. Hastak. 2009. “A system for rehabilitation planning of infrastructure projects.” In Proc., ASCE Int. Pipelines and Trenchless Technology Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 10October 2021

History

Received: Dec 30, 2020
Accepted: Apr 27, 2021
Published online: Jul 20, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 20, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV 26506 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9160-8956. Email: [email protected]
Hota GangaRao, F.ASCE [email protected]
Wadsworth Distinguished Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV 26506. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share