Technical Papers
Apr 8, 2021

Risk-Based Inspection Model for Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement Construction Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 6

Abstract

Hot mix asphalt (HMA) is a critical component in highway construction projects. There is a lack of studies that have investigated the causal relationship between inspection activities and quality of HMA pavement. This study addresses this knowledge gap by developing a risk-based analysis model. The model includes 14 HMA critical inspection activities. The fuzzy set theory (FS) was incorporated into the model to overcome the linguistic nature of the collected data. Bayesian belief networks (BBN) were used to investigate the causal relationship between the model variables. A case study was conducted to test and verify the model. The model is capable of calculating the probability of HMA risk levels, identifying the most likely potential causes of quality shortfall risk, and providing guidance to mitigate the risk via three risk scenarios. This study contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by proposing a risk-based inspection model to investigate the impact of risk on HMA pavement quality. The proposed model may help transportation agencies optimize inspection resources by updating probabilities based on actual inspection results.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the engineers and inspectors of KDOT. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented in this paper. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the KDOT, nor do the contents constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

References

Anbari, M. J., M. Tabesh, and A. Roozbahani. 2017. “Risk assessment model to prioritize sewer pipes inspection in wastewater collection networks.” J. Environ. Manage. 190 (Apr): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.052.
Andersen, G. R., L. E. Chouinard, W. H. Hover, and C. W. Cox. 2001. “Risk indexing tool to assist in prioritizing improvements to embankment dam inventories.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (4): 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(325).
API (American Petroleum Institute). 2016. Risk-based inspection. Washington, DC: API.
Avella, J. R. 2016. “Delphi panels: Research design, procedures, advantages, and challenges.” Int. J. Doctoral Stud. 11 (1): 305–321. https://doi.org/10.28945/3561.
Bertolini, M., M. Bevilacqua, F. E. Ciarapica, and G. Giacchetta. 2009. “Development of risk-based inspection and maintenance procedures for an oil refinery.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 (2): 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.01.003.
Borsuk, M.E., C. A. Stow, and K. H. Reckhow. 2004. “A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis.” Ecol. Modell. 173 (2): 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.08.020.
das Chagas Moura, M., I. D. Lins, E. L. Droguett, R. F. Soares, and R. Pascual. 2015. “A multi-objective genetic algorithm for determining efficient risk-based inspection programs.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 133 (Jan): 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.09.018.
De Carlo, F., O. Borgia, and M. Tucci. 2011. “Risk-based inspections enhanced with Bayesian networks.” Proc., Inst. Mech. Eng., Part O: J. Risk Reliab. 225 (3): 375–386.
Detyniecki, M., and R. R. Yager. 2000. “Ranking fuzzy numbers using α-weighted valuations.” Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 8 (5): 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021848850000040X.
Dong, Y., and D. M. Frangopol. 2016. “Incorporation of risk and updating in inspection of fatigue-sensitive details of ship structures.” Int. J. Fatigue 82: 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.09.026.
Eleye-Datubo, A. G., A. Wall, and J. Wang. 2008. “Marine and offshore safety assessment by incorporative risk modeling in a fuzzy-Bayesian network of an induced mass assignment paradigm.” Risk Anal. 28 (1): 95–112.
Emrouznejad, A., and W. Ho. 2017. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Georgiou, P., and A. Loizos. 2019. “Quality assurance of HMA pavement surface macrotexture: Empirical models vs experimental approach.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 12 (4): 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0042-z.
Hallowell, M. R., and J. A. Gambatese. 2010. “Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi method to CEM research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (1): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000137.
Ifezue, D., and F. H. Tobins. 2014. “Risk-based inspection of a crude oil import/export line: The corrosion engineer’s role.” J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 14 (3): 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9830-6.
Lassen, T. 2013. “Risk based fatigue inspection planning–state of the art.” Procedia Eng. 66: 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.101.
Leu, S. S., and C. M. Chang. 2013. “Bayesian-network-based safety risk assessment for steel construction projects.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 54 (May): 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.019.
Li, P.-C., G.-H. Chen, L.-C. Dai, and L. Zhang. 2012. “A fuzzy Bayesian network approach to improve the quantification of organizational influences in HRA frameworks.” Saf. Sci. 50 (7): 1569–1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.03.017.
Luque, J., and D. Straub. 2019. “Risk-based optimal inspection strategies for structural systems using dynamic Bayesian networks.” Struct. Saf. 76 (Jan): 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.08.002.
Mancuso, A., M. Compare, A. Salo, E. Zio, and T. Laakso. 2016. “Risk-based optimization of pipe inspections in large underground networks with imprecise information.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 152 (Aug): 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.011.
Marlow, D. R., D. J. Beale, and J. S. Mashford. 2012. “Risk-based prioritization and its application to inspection of valves in the water sector.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 100 (Apr): 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.12.014.
Matsumoto, S., R. N. Carvalho, M. Ladeira, P. C. G. da Costa, L. L. Santos, D. Silva, M. Onishi, E. Machado, and K. Cai. 2011. “UnBBayes: A java framework for probabilistic models in AI.” In Java in academia and research, 34. Annerley, Australia: iConcept Press.
Mostafavi, A., D. Abraham, S. Noureldin, G. Pankow, J. Novak, R. Walker, K. Hall, and B. George. 2013. “Risk-based protocol for inspection of transportation construction projects undertaken by state departments of transportation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (8): 977–986. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000664.
Nguyen, L. D., D. Q. Tran, and M. P. Chandrawinata. 2016. “Predicting safety risk of working at heights using Bayesian networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (9): 04016041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001154.
Park, S. T., and B. S. Yang. 2010. “An implementation of risk-based inspection for elevator maintenance.” J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 24 (12): 2367–2376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-010-1004-1.
Plati, C., P. Georgiou, and A. Loizos. 2016. “A comprehensive approach for the assessment of HMA compatibility using GPR technique.” Near Surf. Geophys. 14 (2): 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2015043.
Radziszewski, P., K. J. Kowalski, J. B. Krol, M. Sarnowski, and J. Piłat. 2014. “Quality assessment of bituminous binders based on the viscoelastic properties: Polish experience.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 20 (1): 111–120. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.843586.
Ren, J., I. Jenkinson, J. Wang, D. L. Xu, and J. B. Yang. 2009. “An offshore risk analysis method using fuzzy Bayesian network.” J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. 131 (4): 1–12.
Rowe, G., and G. Wright. 1999. “The delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis.” Int. J. Forecast. 15 (4): 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7.
Sargent, R. G. 2013. “Verification and validation of simulation models.” J. Simul. 7 (1): 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2012.20.
Scott, S., K. Molenaar, J. S. Daniel, and D’Angelo Consulting. 2017. Guidelines for optimizing the risk and cost of materials QA programs. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Selvik, J. T., P. Scarf, and T. Aven. 2011. “An extended methodology for risk-based inspection planning.” Reliab. Theory Appl. 6 (1): 20.
Shuai, J., K. Han, and X. Xu. 2012. “Risk-based inspection for large-scale crude oil tanks.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 25 (1): 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2011.08.004.
Singh, S. N., and J. H. C. Pretorius. 2017. “Development of a semiquantitative approach for risk-based inspection and maintenance of thermal power plant components.” SAIEE Afr. Res. J. 108 (3): 128–138. https://doi.org/10.23919/SAIEE.2017.8531524.
Straub, D., and M. H. Faber. 2005. “Risk based inspection planning for structural systems.” Struct. Saf. 27 (4): 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.04.001.
Sun, J., B. Liu, Z. Chu, L. Chen, and X. Li. 2018. “Tunnel collapse risk assessment based on multistate fuzzy Bayesian networks.” Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 34 (8): 1646–1662. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2351.
Topalis, P., G. Korneliussen, M. Singh, and F. Wiggen. 2011. “New generation risk based inspection methodology and software for the process industry.” In Proc., 24th Int. Congress on Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics Engineering Management, 695–704. Birmingham, UK: Comadem International.
Vinod, G., P. K. Sharma, T. V. Santosh, M. H. Prasad, and K. K. Vaze. 2014. “New approach for risk-based inspection of H2S based process plants.” Ann. Nucl. Energy 66 (Apr): 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.08.042.
Wang, G., T. Yan, J. Zhang, and J. Chen. 2011. “Risk based inspection on the equipment of low-density polyethylene.” Procedia Eng. 15: 1145–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.211.
Washer, G., M. Nasrollahi, C. Applebury, R. Connor, A. Ciolko, R. Kogler, P. Fish, and D. Forsyth. 2014. Proposed guideline for reliability-based bridge inspection practices. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Wintle, J. B., B. W. Kenzie, G. J. Amphlett, and S. Smalley. 2001. Best practice for risk-based inspection as a part of plant integrity management. Norwich, Great Britain: Health and Safety Executive.
Yuan, C., J. Park, X. Xu, H. Cai, D. M. Abraham, and M. D. Bowman. 2018. “Risk based prioritization of construction inspection.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (26): 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118782025.
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control 8 (3): 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
Zhang, L., X. Wu, Y. Qin, M. J. Skibniewski, and W. Liu. 2016. “Towards a fuzzy Bayesian network-based approach for safety risk analysis of tunnel-induced pipeline damage.” Risk Anal. 36 (2): 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12448.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 6June 2021

History

Received: Aug 11, 2020
Accepted: Dec 22, 2020
Published online: Apr 8, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 8, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., 2150 Learned Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3063-3864. Email: [email protected]
Dai Q. Tran, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., 2135C Learned Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share