Case Studies
Feb 19, 2021

Identifying the Challenges to Adopting Robotics in the US Construction Industry

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 5

Abstract

The construction industry has been plagued with a labor shortage, poor productivity, high material wastage, and unsafe working conditions predominantly due to monotonous and labor-intensive activities. Unlike construction, other industries have successfully adopted prefabrication, automation, and robotics to enhance their productivity, safety, and sustainability throughout their processes. However, the construction industry is unable to fully integrate such groundbreaking technologies due to various challenges. To date, there is scarce research that identifies and documents the existing barriers to the usage of robotics, particularly within the United States construction industry, thus impeding the mainstream adoption of robotics due either to a lack of identifying such challenges or poor understanding of them. The goal of this study is to identify the documented barriers to adopting robotics in the US construction industry, which in turn can support a profound understanding of such barriers as well as informing the construction industry and academic researchers about how to look for solutions for these barriers. This effort of identifying the challenges to using robotics is the foundation to support and advance the adoption of such technology by, for example, fulfilling the need to provide robotic training for the future US workforce. To achieve this goal, this research targeted high-quality journals from ASCE as well as the ScienceDirect library and, as a result, identified 14 unique barriers through a critical literature review of 291 research articles published between the years 1980 and 2020. The study specifies unique findings that contribute to construction management, including planning, productivity, practices, workforce education and development, and construction automation, bodies of knowledge by identifying the challenges behind the uncertain adoption of robotics in the US construction industry. The findings of this research are also critical to the profession in terms of understanding the myths associated with the uncertainty impacts of using robotics in relation to our future workforce. The US construction industry needs to initially realize the benefits, target the barriers based on difficulty of resolution, and then exploit opportunities through addressing the barriers that impede the integration of robotics, which could ultimately bring about a sustainable paradigm shift in construction practices.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository or online in accordance with funder data retention policies. The data can be accessed through an open access data repository, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) (https://doi.org/10.3886/E119966V2) (Pradhananga et al. 2020).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Valentina Ferrer Rivero and Rubaya Rahat for their support and collaboration during the data collection stages and analyses of the research study, which is gratefully appreciated.

References

Ahn, Y. H., Y. H. Kwak, and S. J. Suk. 2016. “Contractors’ transformation strategies for adopting building information modeling.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (1): 05015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000390.
Associated General Contractors. 2020. “South Florida associated general contractors.” Accessed January 30, 2020. https://sfagc.org/about.
Autor, D. H. 2015. “Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation.” J. Econ. Perspect. 29 (3): 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3.
Bairagi, V., and M. V. Munot. 2019. Research methodology: A practical and scientific approach. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Bock, T., and T. Linner. 2016. Site automation: Automated/robotic on-site factories. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bryson, L. S., C. Maynard, D. Castro-Lacouture, and R. L. Williams. 2005. “Fully autonomous robot for paving operations.” In Construction research congress 2005: Broadening perspectives, 371–381. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Cai, S., Z. Ma, M. J. Skibniewski, and S. Bao. 2019. “Construction automation and robotics for high-rise buildings over the past decades: A comprehensive review.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 42 (Sep): 100989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100989.
Chen, J., C. R. Ahn, and S. Han. 2014. “Detecting the hazards of lifting and carrying in construction through a coupled 3D sensing and IMUs sensing system.” In Proc., 2014 Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, 1110–1117. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chen, W., Y. Xu, R. Jin, and D. Wanatowski. 2019. “Text mining-based review of articles published in the journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 145 (4): 06019002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000425.
Chen, Y., D. John, and R. F. Cox. 2018. Qualitatively exploring the impact of BIM on construction performance, 60–71. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Davila Delgado, J. M., L. Oyedele, A. Ajayi, L. Akanbi, O. Akinade, M. Bilal, and H. Owolabi. 2019. “Robotics and automated systems in construction: Understanding industry-specific challenges for adoption.” J. Build. Eng. 26 (Jul): 100868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100868.
Doody, O., and C. M. Doody. 2015. “Conducting a pilot study: Case study of a novice researcher.” Br. J. Nurs. 24 (21): 1074–1078. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.21.1074.
ElZomor, M., C. Mann, K. Doten-Snitker, K. Parrish, and M. Chester. 2018. “Leveraging vertically integrated courses and problem-based learning to improve students’ performance and skills.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 144 (1): 04018009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000379.
Everett, J. G., and H. Saito. 1996. “Construction automation: Demands and satisfiers in the United States and Japan.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 122 (2): 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:2(147).
García de Soto, B., I. Agustí-Juan, J. Hunhevicz, S. Joss, K. Graser, G. Habert, and B. T. Adey. 2018. “Productivity of digital fabrication in construction: Cost and time analysis of a robotically built wall.” Autom. Constr. 92 (Apr): 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.04.004.
Haas, C., M. Skibniewski, and E. Budny. 1995. “Robotics in civil engineering.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (5): 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.1995.tb00298.x.
Habib, M. K., Y. Baudoin, and F. Nagata. 2011. “Robotics for rescue and risky intervention.” In Proc., IECON Industrial Electronics Conf., 3305–3310. New York: IEEE.
Hatami, M., I. Flood, B. Franz, and X. Zhang. 2019. “State-of-the-art review on the applicability of AI methods to automated construction manufacturing.” In Proc., ASCE Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil Engineering 2019. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482438.047.
Hill, R. 1998. “What sample size is ‘enough’ in internet survey research ?” Interpersonal Comput. Technol.: Electron. J. 21st Century 6 (3): 1–10.
Ibbs, C. W. 1986. “Future directions for computerized construction research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 112 (3): 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1986)112:3(326).
Kim, P., C. Jingdao, K. C. Yong, and R. Liu. 2018. “Autonomous mobile robot localization and mapping for unknown construction environments.” In Construction research congress 2018, 429–438. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kim, S., A. Moore, D. Srinivasan, A. Akanmu, A. Barr, C. Harris-Adamson, D. M. Rempel, and M. A. Nussbaum. 2019. “Potential of exoskeleton technologies to enhance safety, health, and performance in construction: Industry perspectives and future research directions.” IISE Trans. Occup. Ergon. Hum. Factors 7 (3–4): 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2018.1561557.
Lattanzi, D., and G. Miller. 2017. “Review of robotic infrastructure inspection systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (3): 04017004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000353.
Lim, J. N., F. Schultmann, and G. Ofori. 2010. “Tailoring competitive advantages derived from innovation to the needs of construction firms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (5): 568–580. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000151.
Louis, J., and P. S. Dunston. 2017. “Methodology for real-time monitoring of construction operations using finite state machines and discrete-event operation models.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (3): 04016106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001243.
Manuel, J., D. Delgado, L. Oyedele, A. Ajayi, L. Akanbi, O. Akinade, M. Bilal, and H. Owolabi. 2019. “Robotics and automated systems in construction: Understanding industry-specific challenges for adoption.” J. Build. Eng. 26 (Jul): 100868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100868.
Moss School of Construction Infrastructure and Sustainability. 2020. “Industry Advisory Council—Moss Department of Construction Management.” Accessed January 30, 2020. https://cm.fiu.edu/research/industry-advisory.
Nof, S. Y. 1999. Handbook of industrial robotics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Noghabaei, M., A. Heydarian, V. Balali, and K. Han. 2020. “Trend analysis on adoption of virtual and augmented reality in the architecture, engineering, and construction industry.” Data 5 (1): 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5010026.
Pradhananga, P., M. ElZomor, and G. Santi. 2020. Literature review of barriers of robotics adoption in construction. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Schraft, R. D., U. Bräuning, T. Orlowski, and M. Hornemann. 2000. “Automated cleaning of windows on standard facades.” Autom. Constr. 9 (5): 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00060-1.
Sethi, M., and J. Kang. 2016. “Sustainable design automation for simple and repetitive structures.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2016, 2039–2049. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Song, J., C. T. Haas, C. Caldas, E. Ergen, and B. Akinci. 2006. “Automating the task of tracking the delivery and receipt of fabricated pipe spools in industrial projects.” Autom. Constr. 15 (2): 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.03.001.
South Florida Construction Market Opportunity Report. 2018. Which construction firms in South Florida are the most digitally-savvy?, 443–471. Boca Raton, FL: SP Home Run Inc.
Van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2017. Manual for VOS viewer Versión 1.6.6. Leiden, Netherlands: Centre for Science and Technology Studies.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 5May 2021

History

Received: Apr 11, 2020
Accepted: Oct 16, 2020
Published online: Feb 19, 2021
Published in print: May 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jul 19, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Piyush Pradhananga, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida International Univ. College of Engineering and Computing, 10555 West Flagler St., Miami, FL 33174. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and Sustainability, Florida International Univ. College of Engineering and Computing, 10555 West Flagler St., Miami, FL 33174 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7734-9601. Email: [email protected]
Gabriella Santi Kasabdji, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Master’s Student, Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and Sustainability, Florida International Univ. College of Engineering and Computing, 10555 West Flagler St., Miami, FL 33174. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share