Technical Papers
Jan 31, 2021

Environmental Weight for Bid Evaluation to Promote Sustainability in Highway Construction Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 4

Abstract

An effective green bidding mechanism is pressingly needed to drive sustainability awareness in construction projects. Nevertheless, several challenges have prevented the success of green bidding implementation in current practice, including difficulty in establishing a powerful bidding preference that has the capability to effectively encourage every construction-oriented party toward sustainability. This paper developed a novel, sustainable bidding model to identify a potential environmental weight for evaluating the environmental impacts using the amount of CO2 emission generated from construction equipment fleet operations. A highway construction project case study in Thailand was used to evaluate the performance and capabilities of the developed model in specifying possible environmental weights toward sustainable bidding. The model facilitated the quantification of different construction equipment mixes and their impact on the environment, based on the cost per kilogram of CO2 equivalent for inclusion in the bidding award preference. The model was validated to investigate the green bidding preference awarded to a contractor. The validation results confirmed the benefit of including the environmental weight in the bidder evaluation to provide better opportunities for contractors pursuing sustainability in bid winning under an impartial and more practicable environment. The developed model contributes to (1) promoting greater practicality in the existing confined green bidding mechanism by incorporating an effective sustainability weight for green performance evaluation of construction bidders and (2) reducing the substantial environmental impacts of construction equipment by offering incentives in the primitive bidding approach to create sustainable initiatives for public works contractors.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated and analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI), Bangkok, Thailand. The authors express special thanks to the Expressway Authority of Thailand for providing the data for the case study analysis. However, any opinions, findings, and recommendations in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any opinions of the funding agency or the Expressway Authority of Thailand.

References

Ahn, C., J. C. Martinez, P. V. Rekapalli, and F. A. Peña-Mora. 2009. “Sustainability analysis of earthmoving operations.” In Proc., 2009 Winter Simulation Conf., 2605–2611. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2009.5429656.
Ahn, C., W. Pan, S. Lee, and F. Peña-Mora. 2010. “Enhanced estimation of air emissions from construction operations based on discrete-event simulation.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (ICCCBE) 2010. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ahn, C., F. Peña-Mora, S. Lee, and C. A. Arboleda. 2013. “Consideration of the environmental cost in construction contracting for public works: A + C and A + B + C bidding methods.” J. Manage. Eng. 29 (1): 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000124.
Anthonissen, J., D. Van Troyen, and J. Braet. 2015. “Using carbon dioxide emissions as a criterion to award road construction projects: A pilot case in Flanders.” J. Cleaner Prod. 102 (Sep): 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.020.
Asgari, S., X. Song, and I. Odeh. 2013. “Introducing the concept of green performance bond and its application in managing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in construction projects.” In Proc., 4th Construction Specialty Conf., 1–10. Quebec: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Asgari, S., X. Song, and I. Odeh. 2017. “Managing greenhouse gas emissions in civil infrastructure projects using green performance bond.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Sustainable Infrastructure, 231–243. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481196.021.
Bailey, K. 2005. Emission reduction incentives for off-road diesel equipment used in the port and construction sectors. Fairfax, VA: ICF Consulting.
Cass, D., and A. Mukherjee. 2011. “Calculation of greenhouse gas emissions for highway construction operations by using a hybrid life-cycle assessment approach: Case study for pavement operations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (11): 1015–1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000349.
Cui, Q., and X. Zhu. 2011. “Green contracting in highway construction: State of the practice.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2228 (1): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.3141/2228-02.
Cui, Q., X. Zhu, L. Whitten, and R. Dason-Deane. 2011. Innovative contracting strategies for combating climate change. Annapolis, MD: State Highway Administration.
EPA. 2005a. Emission facts: Average carbon dioxide emissions resulting from gasoline and diesel fuel. Washington DC: EPA.
EPA. 2005b. User’s guide for the final nonroad 2005 model. Washington DC: EPA.
EPA. 2008. “Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions from key industrial sectors in the United States.” Accessed May 24, 2018. https://archive.epa.gov/sectors/web/pdf/greenhouse-report.pdf.
EPA. 2009. “EPA: Greenhouse gases threaten public health and the environment.” Accessed May 23, 2018. https://archive.epa.gov/epapages/newsroom_archive/newsreleases/08d11a451131bca585257685005bf252.html.
Garg, C., and A. Jain. 2014. “Green concrete: Efficient & eco-friendly construction materials.” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 2 (2): 259–264.
Herbsman, Z. J. 1995. “A + B bidding method—Hidden success story for highway construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 121 (4): 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:4(430).
Kim, B., H. Lee, H. Park, and H. Kim. 2011. “Greenhouse gas emissions from onsite equipment usage in road construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (8): 982–990. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000515.
Kisku, N., H. Joshi, M. Ansari, S. K. Panda, S. Nayak, and S. C. Dutta. 2017. “A critical review and assessment for usage of recycled aggregate as sustainable construction material.” Constr. Build. Mater. 131 (Jan): 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.029.
Komatsu. 2008. “Introduction of PC200-8 hybrid hydraulic excavators.” Accessed May 24, 2018. https://home.komatsu/en/company/tech-innovation/report/pdf/161-E-05.pdf.
Lewis, P., M. Leming, and W. Rasdorf. 2011. “Impact of engine idling on fuel use and CO2 emissions of nonroad diesel construction equipment.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 28 (1): 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000068.
Limsawasd, C., and N. Athigakunagorn. 2016. “Consideration of the optimal weight for environmental cost in construction contracting for large-scale transportation projects.” In Proc., 16th Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering. Tokyo: International Society for Computing in Civil and Building Engineering and Japan Society of Civil Engineers.
Limsawasd, C., and N. Athigakunagorn. 2017. “An application of discrete-event simulation in estimating emissions from equipment operations in flexible pavement construction projects.” Eng. J. 21 (7): 197–211. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2017.21.7.197.
Martinez, J. C. 2001. “EZStrobe: General-purpose simulation system based on activity cycle diagrams.” In Proc., 33rd Conf. on Winter Simulation, 1556–1564. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2001.977485.
Metham, M., and V. Benjaoran. 2018. “Incentive contracts for road construction to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.” Eng. J. 22 (5): 105–122. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2018.22.5.105.
Metham, M., V. Benjaoran, and A. Sedthamanop. 2019. “An evaluation of green road incentive procurement in road construction projects by using the AHP.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 2019 (Jul): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1635757.
Naparswad, T. 2013. “A study of fuel consumption of trucks.” Master’s thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Suranaree Univ. of Technology.
Ochiai, M., and S. Ryu. 2008. “Hybrid in construction machinery.” In Proc., JFPS Int. Symp. on Fluid Power, 41–44. Tokyo: Japan Fluid Power System Society.
Pang, S. H., H. C. Frey, and W. J. Rasdorf. 2009. “Life cycle inventory energy consumption and emissions for biodiesel versus petroleum diesel fueled construction vehicles.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (16): 6398–6405. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802916u.
Peña-Mora, F., C. Ahn, M. Golparvar-Fard, L. Hajibabai, S. Shiftehfar, S. An, and Z. Aziz. 2009. “A framework for managing emissions from construction processes.” In Proc., Int. Conf. & Workshop on Sustainable Green Building Design & Construction. Arlington, TX: National Science Foundation.
Ruparathna, R., and K. Hewage. 2015. “Sustainable procurement in the Canadian construction industry: Current practices, drivers and opportunities.” J. Cleaner Prod. 109 (Dec): 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.007.
Sanchez, X. A., L. Lehtiranta, K. D. Hampson, and R. Kenley. 2014. “Evaluation framework for green procurement in road construction.” Smart Sustainable Built Environ. 3 (2): 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-05-2013-0028.
Somboonpisan, J., C. Limsawasd, and N. Athigakunagorn. 2019. “Carbon footprint assessment for resilient infrastructure construction using discrete-event simulation.” In Proc., 8th Civil Engineering Conf. in the Asian Region. Tokyo: Asian Civil Engineering Coordinating Council, Japan Society of Civil Engineers.
Varnäs, A., B. Balfors, and C. Faith-Ell. 2009. “Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts: Current practice, problems and opportunities in green procurement in the Swedish construction industry.” J. Cleaner Prod. 17 (13): 1214–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.001.
Walker, D., and K. Hampson. 2008. Procurement strategies: A relationship-based approach. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Winiwarter, W., and K. Rypdal. 2001. “Assessing the uncertainty associated with national greenhouse gas emission inventories: A case study for Austria.” Atmos. Environ. 35 (32): 5425–5440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00171-6.
Zhang, H. 2013. “Discrete-event simulation for estimating emissions from construction processes.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (2): 04014034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000236.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 4April 2021

History

Received: Mar 31, 2020
Accepted: Oct 14, 2020
Published online: Jan 31, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 30, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart Univ., Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0004-0494. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart Univ., Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6364-5231. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share