Technical Papers
Nov 20, 2020

Noncompete Provision Design for Transportation PPP Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 2

Abstract

Projects with poor noncompete provision design have caused heavy costs for both public and private organizations, primarily due to the embedded monopoly right of the private sector to collect toll revenue. Prior studies have investigated the financial impact of including noncompete provisions in public-private partnership (PPP) contracts to ensure project attractiveness to private entities, although the potential impact of such provisions on the public interest has not been well documented. This study contributes to the literature by incorporating social benefits into an evaluation model to balance the protection of public and private interests. Three contract design alternatives—strict noncompete, compensation for competing facilities, and compete without compensation—are evaluated and compared. This study demonstrates these alternatives with the I-77 Express Lane project in North Carolina and provides several insightful results. First, a strict noncompete provision often worsens congestion, negatively affecting the public interest, and should be avoided. Second, both public and private organizations may benefit from inclusion of a compensation provision that eliminates a prospective monopoly while offering compensation for competing facilities. Third, public benefits from competing facilities present a convex curve over time, suggesting optimal timing for the government to build the competing facility. The results illustrate the significant effect of the noncompete provision on the public interest, and provide governments with a reference to balance protection of the public interest and attractiveness to private investors when designing the noncompete provision.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Aashtiani, H. Z., and T. L. Magnanti. 1981. “Equilibria on a congested transportation network.” SIAM J. Algebra Discrete Methods 2 (3): 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1137/0602024.
Antillon, E. I., M. J. Garvin, K. R. Molenaar, and A. Javernick-Will. 2018. “Influence of interorganizational coordination on lifecycle design decision making: Comparative case study of public-private partnership highway projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (5): 05018007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000623.
Ashuri, B., H. Kashani, K. R. Molenaar, S. Lee, and J. Lu. 2011. “Risk-neutral pricing approach for evaluating BOT highway projects with government minimum revenue guarantee options.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (4): 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000447.
Bayram, V., B. Ç. Tansel, and H. Yaman. 2015. “Compromising system and user interests in shelter location and evacuation planning.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 72 (Feb): 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.11.010.
Boarnet, M. G., and J. F. Dimento. 2004. “The private sector’s role in highway finance: Lessons from SR 91.” Access Mag. 25 (4): 25–31.
BPR (Bureau of Public Road). 1964. Traffic assignment manual for application with a large, high speed computer. Washington, DC: Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Public Roads Office of Planning Urban Planning Div.
Brandão, L. E., C. Bastian-Pinto, L. L. Gomes, and M. Labes. 2012. “Government supports in public-private partnership contracts: Metro Line 4 of the São Paulo subway system.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 18 (3): 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000095.
Brandão, L. E. T., and E. Saraiva. 2008. “The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 26 (11): 1171–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190802428051.
Buxbaum, J., and I. Ortiz. 2009. Public sector decision making for public-private partnerships. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Cai, J., S. Li, and H. Cai. 2019. “Empirical analysis of capital structure determinants in infrastructure projects under public-private partnerships.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (5): 04019032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001658.
Chiara, N., and N. Kokkaew. 2013. “Alternative to government revenue guarantees: Dynamic revenue insurance contracts.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (3): 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000145.
C&M Associates. 2015. Managed lanes: Investment grade traffic and revenue study report. Dallas: C&M Associates.
Cui, Q. 2019. Major project information sources. College Park, MD: Maryland Transportation Institute.
Feng, Z., S. B. Zhang, and Y. Gao. 2015. “Modeling the impact of government guarantees on toll charge, road quality and capacity for build-operate-transfer (BOT) road projects.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 78 (Aug): 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.006.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2016. “Challenges and opportunities series: Public private partnerships in transportation delivery.” Accessed July 22, 2016. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/p3/resources/challenges_and_opportunities/statutory_issues.aspx.
Findley, D. J., J. R. Stone, S. J. Fain, and R. S. Foyle. 2007. NCDOT benefit/cost analysis for planning highway projects. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina DOT.
Gabriel, S., and D. Bernsteid. 1997. “The traffic equilibrium problem with nonadditive path costs.” Transp. Sci. 31 (4): 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.31.4.337.
Guo, Z., J. Deride, and Y. Fan. 2016. “Infrastructure planning for fast charging stations in a competitive market.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 68 (Jul): 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.04.010.
Harrison, S. 2015. “As other cities protest, Charlotte leaders quietly accept terms of I-77 toll lane deal.” Accessed May 2, 2017. http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article21253035.html.
Jeihani, M., S. Lawe, and J. P. Connolly. 2006. “Improving traffic assignment model using intersection delay function.” In Proc., 47th Transportation Research Forum. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
Li, S., D. Abraham, and H. Cai. 2017. “Infrastructure financing with project bond and credit default swap under public-private partnerships.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (3): 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.005.
Li, S., and H. Cai. 2017. “Government incentive impacts on private investment behaviors under demand uncertainty.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 101 (May): 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.03.007.
Liu, J., X. Yu, and C. Y. J. Cheah. 2014. “Evaluation of restrictive competition in PPP projects using real option approach.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (3): 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.007.
Liu, S., H. Jin, C. Liu, B. Xie, and A. Mills. 2019. “Government compensation and costs of non-competition guarantee for PPP rental retirement villages.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 27 (1): 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2019-0063.
Moore, M. A., A. E. Boardman, and A. R. Vining. 2017. “Analyzing risk in PPP provision of utility services: A social welfare perspective.” Util. Policy 48 (Oct): 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2017.08.008.
Ordooez, F., and N. E. Stiermoses. 2010. “Wardrop equilibria with risk-averse users.” Transp. Sci. 44 (1): 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1090.0292.
Park, T., B. Kim, and H. Kim. 2012. “Real option approach to sharing privatization risk in underground infrastructures.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (6): 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000636.
Persad, K. R., C. M. Walton, and J. Wilke. 2005. Alternatives to non-compete clauses in toll development agreements. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas Center for Transportation Research.
Poole, R. W., Jr. 2018. Annual privatization report: Transportation finance. Los Angeles: Reason Foundation.
Riemann, R., D. Z. Wang, and F. Busch. 2015. “Optimal location of wireless charging facilities for electric vehicles: Flow-capturing location model with stochastic user equilibrium.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 58 (Sep): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.06.022.
Rouhani, O. M., R. R. Geddes, H. O. Gao, and G. Bel. 2016. “Social welfare analysis of investment public-private partnership approaches for transportation projects.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 88 (Jun): 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.11.003.
Shi, S., Y. Yin, and X. Guo. 2016. “Optimal choice of capacity, toll and government guarantee for build-operate-transfer roads under asymmetric cost information.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 85 (Mar): 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.12.019.
Stefanello, F., L. S. Buriol, M. J. Hirsch, P. M. Pardalos, T. Querido, M. G. Resende, and M. Ritt. 2017. “On the minimization of traffic congestion in road networks with tolls.” Ann. Oper. Res. 249 (1–2): 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1800-1.
Sun, Y., and L. Zhang. 2014. “Balancing public and private stakeholder interests in BOT concessions: Minimum revenue guarantee and royalty scheme applied to a water treatment project in China.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (2): 04014070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000930.
USDOT. 2014. “The value of travel time savings: Departmental guidance for conducting economic evaluations revision 2 (2014 update).” Accessed April 15, 2019. https://www.transportation.gov/office-policy/transportation-policy/revised-departmental-guidance-valuation-travel-time-economic.
Wang, F., M. Xiong, B. Niu, and X. Zhuo. 2018. “Impact of government subsidy on BOT contract design: Price, demand, and concession period.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 110 (Apr): 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.006.
Wang, Y., P. Cui, and J. Liu. 2018. “Analysis of the risk-sharing ratio in PPP projects based on government minimum revenue guarantees.” Int. J. Project Manage. 36 (6): 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.007.
Wardrop, J. G. 1952. “Road paper. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 1 (3): 325–362. https://doi.org/10.1680/ipeds.1952.11259.
Weaver, E., A. D’Alessio, and Q. Cui. 2018. “Non-compete provisions in public-private partnerships: A review of current practice.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zhang, S., Y. Gao, Z. Feng, and W. Sun. 2015. “PPP application in infrastructure development in China: Institutional analysis and implications.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (3): 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.006.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 2February 2021

History

Received: Jul 24, 2019
Accepted: Aug 29, 2020
Published online: Nov 20, 2020
Published in print: Feb 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Apr 20, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bing Wang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Lecturer, School of Management, Zhejiang Univ. of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, PR China; formerly, Visiting Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. Email: [email protected]
Qingbin Cui, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Shuibo Zhang [email protected]
Professor, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, PR China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share