Technical Papers
Sep 30, 2020

Empirical Inference System for Highway Project Delivery Selection Using Fuzzy Pattern Recognition

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146, Issue 12

Abstract

Selection of a project delivery method in highway construction is a challenging task because of the many decision criteria involved. In addition to quantitative project attributes, the project delivery decision-making process also typically relies on qualitative measures such as subjective judgments and experts’ opinions based on their experience with similar completed projects. Although current probabilistic methods provide a robust means to analyze quantitative data, they are not ideally suited for treating uncertainties encountered in qualitative data. To overcome the identified gap, this study investigated fuzzy pattern recognition, a mathematical technique based on fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic, to model a combination of quantitative and qualitative variables in highway project delivery selection. A fuzzy rule-based inference system was developed, trained, and tested using 254 empirical highway projects with particular project attributes including project type, project complexity, delivery risk, and cost performance. The proposed system was verified by performing a case project with the result of accurately recognizing the true project delivery method used and associated cost growth performance expectations. The flexibility of fuzzy membership functions in the proposed system helps leverage the evaluation of a combination of quantitative and qualitative variables in project delivery method selection in complex highway construction projects. In addition, this data-driven fuzzy inference system also allows for multiple decision scenarios based on the decision maker’s judgments of delivery risks and project complexity. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by developing an empirical inference system to recognize possible patterns of delivery methods associated with cost growths for new highway projects. This study may assist highway agencies in making project delivery decisions based on project attributes, historical data, and their relevant experience.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Dr. Keith Molenaar from the University of Colorado Boulder for helping with data collection used in this paper.

References

Al Nahyan, M., Y. Hawas, M. Raza, H. Aljassmi, M. Maraqa, B. Basheerudeen, and M. Mohammad. 2018. “A fuzzy-based decision support system for ranking the delivery methods of mega projects.” Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 11 (1): 122–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2017-0055.
Bezdek, J. C., J. Keller, R. Krisnapuram, and N. R. Pal. 1999. “Fuzzy models and algorithms for pattern recognition and image processing.” In The handbooks of fuzzy sets series, edited by D. Dubois and H. Prade. New York: Springer.
Bypaneni, S. 2017. “A BN-based decision framework for selecting project delivery methods in highway construction.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas.
Bypaneni, S., and D. Tran. 2018. “Empirical identification and evaluation of risk in highway project delivery methods.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (3): 04018007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000602.
Castellano, G., A. M. Fanelli, and C. Mencar. 2007. “Mining diagnostic rules using fuzzy clustering.” In Advances in fuzzy clustering and its applications, edited by J. de Oliveira and W. Pedrycz, 211–228. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061190.ch10.
Chan, A. P. C., D. W. M. Chan, and J. F. Y. Yeung. 2009. “Overview of the application of ‘fuzzy techniques’ in construction management research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (11): 1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000099.
Chen, Y. Q., J. Y. Liu, B. G. Li, and B. S. Lin. 2011. “Project delivery system selection of construction projects in China.” Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (5): 5456–5462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.008.
Chiu, S. L. 1997. “Extracting fuzzy rules from data for function approximation and pattern classification.” In Fuzzy information engineering: A guided tour of applications, edited by D. Dubois, H. Prade, and R. Yager, 149–162. New York: Wiley.
Choi, J., S. Yun, F. Leite, and S. Mulva. 2019. “Team integration and owner satisfaction: Comparing integrated project delivery with construction management at risk in health care projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (1): 05018014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000654.
Creedy, G., M. Skitmore, and J. Wong. 2010. “Evaluation of risk factors leading to cost overrun in delivery of highway construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (5): 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000160.
Daneshvar, M. 2011. “Programmable trapezoidal and Gaussian membership function generator.” J. Basic Appl. Sci. Res. 1 (11): 2073–2079.
Das, S. 2013. “Pattern recognition using the fuzzy c-means technique.” Int. J. Energy Inf. Commun. 4 (1): 1–14.
Douglas, A., A. Antoine, M. Schrilla, and K. Molenaar. 2016. “The use and performance of alternative contracting methods on small highway construction projects.” Procedia Eng. 145: 908–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.118.
Duda, R. O., P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork. 2001. Pattern classification. New York: Wiley.
El Asmar, M., A. Hanna, and W. Loh. 2013. “Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (11): 04013012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000744.
Elbarkouky, M., A. Fayek, N. Siraj, and N. Sadeghi. 2016. “Fuzzy arithmetic risk analysis approach to determine construction project contingency.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (12): 04016070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001191.
Elwood, E. 2014. “Fuzzy classification and fuzzy pattern recognition of seismic damage to concrete structures.” Accessed December 31, 2018. http://www/proquest.com/products-services/dissertations/.
Elwood, E., and R. Corotis. 2015. “Application of fuzzy pattern recognition of seismic damage to concrete structures.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 1 (4): 04015011. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000831.
Fayek, A. R., and A. Oduba. 2005. “Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using fuzzy expert systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (8): 938–941. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:8(938).
Garibaldi, J., C. Chen, and T. Razak. 2017. “Fuzzy logic toolkit for R [Ebook].” Accessed October 15, 2019. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FuzzyR/FuzzyR.pdf.
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Hoppner, F., F. Klawonn, R. Kruse, and T. Runkler. 1999. Fuzzy cluster analysis methods for classification, data analysis and image recognition. New York: Wiley.
Hwang, H. 2004. “Identification of a Gaussian fuzzy classifier.” Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 2 (1): 118–124.
Iqbal, J., A. Gorai, Y. Katpatal, and G. Pathak. 2015. “Development of GIS-based fuzzy pattern recognition model (modified DRASTIC model) for groundwater vulnerability to pollution assessment.” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12 (10): 3161–3174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0693-x.
Kassambara, A. 2017. “Practical guide to cluster analysis in R: Unsupervised machine learning (multivariate analysis).” Accessed February 15, 2020. https://www.datanovia.com/en/wp-content/uploads/dn-tutorials/book-preview/clustering_en_preview.pdf.
Khanzadi, M., F. Nasirzadeh, S. Hassani, and N. Nejad Mohtashemi. 2016. “An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making approach for project delivery system selection.” Sci. Iranica 23 (3): 802–814. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2016.2160.
Knott, C., L. Hovell, and N. Karimian. 2013. “Type 1 fuzzy logic toolkit [Ebook].” Accessed October 7, 2019. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FuzzyToolkitUoN/FuzzyToolkitUoN.pdf.
Korkmaz, S., D. Riley, and M. Horman. 2010. “Piloting evaluation metrics for sustainable high-performance building project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 877–885. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000195.
Kruse, R., C. Doring, and M.-J. Lesot. 2007. “Fundamentals of fuzzy clustering.” In Advances in fuzzy clustering and its applications, edited by J. V. de Oliveira and W. Pedrycz, 3–30. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
Lantz, B. 2015. Machine learning with R. 2nd ed. 286–296. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing.
Mafakheri, F., L. Dai, D. Slezak, and F. Nasiri. 2007. “Project delivery system selection under uncertainty multicriteria multilevel decision aid model.” J. Manage. Eng. 4 (200): 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2007)23:4(200).
Mamdani, E. H., and S. Assilian. 1975. “An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller.” Int. J. Man-Machine Stud. 7 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2.
Martin, H., T. Lewis, A. Petersen, and E. Peters. 2017. “Cloudy with a chance of fuzzy: Building a multicriteria uncertainty model for construction project delivery selection.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 31 (1): 04016046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000614.
Mathew, S., D. Tran, and L. D. Nguyen. 2018. “Examining impact of risk on cost growth in design-build projects using structural equation modeling.” In Proc., ASCE Construction Research Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Molenaar, K., and A. Songer. 1998. “Model for public sector design-build project selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (6): 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:6(467).
Mostafavi, A., and M. Karamouz. 2010. “Selecting appropriate project delivery system: Fuzzy approach with risk analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 923–930. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000190.
Nagalakshmi, G., and S. Jyothi. 2013. “A survey on pattern recognition using fuzzy clustering approaches.” Int. Refereed J. Eng. Sci. 2 (5): 24–31.
Nguyen, P., D. Tran, and B. Lines. 2020. “Fuzzy set theory approach to classify highway project characteristics for delivery selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (5): 04020044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001829.
Niskanen, V. S. 2004. Soft computing methods in human sciences. New York: Springer.
Novák, V., I. Perfilieva, and A. Dvoøák. 2016. Insight into fuzzy modeling. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Paek, J., Y. Lee, and T. Napier. 1992. “Selection of design/build proposal using fuzzy-logic system.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 118 (2): 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:2(303).
Piegat, A. 2001. Fuzzy modeling and control. New York: Wiley.
Riza, L., C. Bergmeir, F. Herrera, and J. Benitez. 2014. “Learning from data using the R package ‘FRBS’.” In Proc., IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE). New York: IEEE.
Ross, T. J. 2010. Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. 3rd ed. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
Setnes, M., R. Babuska, U. Kaymak, and H. van Nauta Lemke. 1998. “Similarity measures in fuzzy rule base simplification.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B (Cybern.) 28 (3): 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.678632.
Shrestha, P. P., J. T. O’Connor, and G. E. Gibson, Jr. 2012. “Performance comparison of large design-build and design-bid-build highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000390.
Sullivan, J., M. E. Asmar, J. Chalhoub, and H. Obeid. 2017. “Two decades of performance comparisons for design-build, construction manager at risk, and design-bid-build: Quantitative analysis of the state of knowledge on project cost, schedule, and quality.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (6): 04017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001282.
Touran, A., D. Gransberg, K. Molenaar, and K. Ghavamifar. 2011. “Selection of project delivery method in transit: Drivers and objectives.” J. Manage. Eng. 27 (1): 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000027.
Touran, A., K. Molenaar, D. Gransberg, and K. Ghavamifar. 2009. “Decision support system for selection of project delivery method in transit.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2111 (1): 148–157. https://doi.org/10.3141/2111-17.
Tran, D. Q., G. Diraviam, and E. R. Minchin. 2018. “Performance of highway design-bid-build and design-build projects by work types.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (2): 04017112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001437.
Tran, D. Q., C. M. Harper, K. R. Molenaar, N. F. Haddad, and M. M. Scholfield. 2013. “A project delivery selection matrix for highway design and construction.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2347 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.3141/2347-01.
Tran, D. Q., and K. R. Molenaar. 2015. “Risk-based project delivery selection model for highway design and construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (12): 04015041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001024.
Tran, D. Q., K. R. Molenaar, and L. F. Alarcon. 2015. “A hybrid cross-impact approach to predicting cost and variance of project delivery decisions for highways.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 22 (1): 04015017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000270.
Tran, V., B. Yang, M. Oh, and A. Tan. 2009. “Fault diagnosis of induction motor based on decision trees and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference.” Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (2): 1840–1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.12.010.
Viattchenin, D., R. Tati, and A. Damaratski. 2013. “Designing Gaussian membership functions for fuzzy classifier generated by heuristic possibilistic clustering.” J. Inf. Organizational Sci. 37 (2): 127–139.
Ye, Z., A. Sadeghian, and B. Wu. 2006. “Mechanical fault diagnostics for induction motor with variable speed drives using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system.” Electr. Power Syst. Res. 76 (9–10): 742–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2005.10.011.
Zeng, Y., and J. Starzyk. 2018. “Statistical approach to clustering in pattern recognition.” In Proc., 33rd Southeastern Symp. on System Theory. New York: IEEE.
Zhankaziev, S., M. Gavrilyuk, D. Morozov, and A. Zabudsky. 2018. “Scientific and methodological approaches to the development of a feasibility study for intelligent transportation systems.” Transp. Res. Procedia 36: 841–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.068.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146Issue 12December 2020

History

Received: Nov 1, 2019
Accepted: Jul 20, 2020
Published online: Sep 30, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., 2150 Learned Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8993-332X. Email: [email protected]
Dai Q. Tran, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., 2135C Learned Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., 2135B Learned Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7998-1053. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share