Technical Papers
Jun 26, 2020

Reducing Damages to Underground Utilities: Importance of Stakeholders’ Behaviors

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146, Issue 9

Abstract

Vital services like clean water, sewer, and electricity utilize underground infrastructure. Unfortunately, many damages to underground utilities are happening during the course of construction activities. Therefore, there is a need for a greater understanding of damage causes to better manage risks to underground utilities during construction work. Understanding the root causes will help stakeholders and policymakers make the best possible decisions to reduce future damages. In this study, utility locators’ perspectives regarding the damage causes and overall prevention process were collected, analyzed, and compared to excavators’ perspectives and responses that were previously reported. Surprisingly, the results suggest that stakeholders’ behaviors (i.e., human factor), rather than technology limitations or current policies, significantly contribute to a breakdown of the damage prevention process. Specifically, communication between stakeholders, excavators’ behaviors, and locators’ working conditions have been identified as crucial factors in the damage prevention process. There are few, if any, empirical studies that have recognized the human factor as a contributing element to utility damages. Thus, the findings will help improve future policy development. In addition, the clear and detailed description of damage causes and prevention processes will help stakeholders understand the contribution of their behaviors to the damage prevention process, which will result in a more reliable and workable process.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

Funding to undertake this study was provided by the NC 811.

References

Abowitz, D. A., and T. M. Toole. 2010. “Mixed method research: Fundamental issues of design, validity, and reliability in construction research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (1): 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000026.
Al-Bayati, A. J., O. Abudayyeh, T. Fredericks, and S. Butt. 2017. “Managing cultural diversity at U.S. construction sites: Hispanic workers’ perspectives.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (9): 04017064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001359.
Al-Bayati, A. J., A. Albert, and G. Ford. 2019a. “Construction safety culture and climate: Satisfying the necessity for an industry framework.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 24 (4): 04019028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000452.
Al-Bayati, A. J., and L. Panzer. 2019a. “Reducing damages to underground utilities: Lessons learned from damage data and excavators in North Carolina.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (12): 04019078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001724.
Al-Bayati, A. J., and L. Panzer. 2019b. “Requirements and practices of underground construction activities: A review of recently updated act.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 04519008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000300.
Al-Bayati, A. J., L. Panzer, and A. Karakhan. 2019b. “Reducing damages to underground infrastructure: Performance evaluation of one-call notification program.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 24 (4): 04019018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000441.
Anspach, J. H., and C. P. Scott. 2019. Subsurface utility engineering for municipalities: Prequalification criteria and scope of work guide. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASCE. 2002. Standard guideline for the collection and depiction of existing subsurface utility data. Reston, VA: ASCE.
CGA (Common Ground Alliance). 2019a. “Best practices guide.” Accessed August 12, 2019. https://commongroundalliance.com/programs/best-practices.
CGA (Common Ground Alliance). 2019b. “One call systems international.” Accessed August 12, 2019. https://commongroundalliance.com/programs/one-call-systems-international.
DIRT (Damage Information Reporting Tool). 2017. “DIRT analysis and recommendations 2017.” Accessed August 12, 2019. http://commongroundalliance.com/media-reports/dirt-report-2017.
Farnsworth, C. B., R. O. Warr, J. E. Weidman, and D. M. Hutchings. 2016. “Effects of CM/GC project delivery on managing process risk in transportation construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (3): 04015091. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001091.
Graves, B. 2019. “Fatal natural gas explosion: Origin and cause investigation report.” Accessed 29, 2019. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jevz_hoYGW1qR0gsEkeYddP2wW1CY1SR/view.
Hyung, S. J., and M. A. Dulcy. 2004. “A decision tool for the selection of imaging technologies to detect underground infrastructure.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 19 (2): 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2003.09.001.
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. London: Sage.
Li, S., H. Cai, and V. R. Kamat. 2015. “Uncertainty-aware geospatial system for mapping and visualizing underground utilities.” Autom. Constr. 53 (May): 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.011.
Liamputtong, P. 2011. Focus group methodology principles and practices. London: Sage.
McMahon W., M. Evans, M. Burtwell, and J. Parker. 2006. Minimising street works disruption: The real costs of street works to the utility industry and society. London: United Kingdom Water Industry Research.
Metje, N., B. Ahmad, and S. M. Crossland. 2015. “Causes, impacts and costs of strikes on buried utility assets.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng. 168 (3): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmuen.14.00035.
Metje, N., P. R. Atkins, and M. J. Brennan. 2007. “Mapping the underworld—State-of-the-art review.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 22 (5): 568–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.04.002.
PHMSA (Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration). 2019. “About excavation enforcement final rule.” Accessed August 12, 2019. https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/excavator-final-rule/about-excavation-enforcement-final-rule.
Siu, K. L., and W. W. L. Lai. 2019. “A lab study of coupling effects of electromagnetic induction on underground utilities.” J. Appl. Geophys. 164 (May): 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.02.002.
Tanoli, W. A., A. Sharafat, and J. Park, and J. W. Seo. 2019. “Damage Prevention for underground utilities using machine guidance.” Automat. Constr. 107: 102893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102893.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146Issue 9September 2020

History

Received: Dec 4, 2019
Accepted: Apr 22, 2020
Published online: Jun 26, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 26, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ahmed Jalil Al-Bayati, Ph.D., M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0244-0638 [email protected]
P.E.
OSHA Authorized Trainer and Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Lawrence Technological Univ., 21000 West Ten Mile Rd., Southfield, MI 48075 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0244-0638. Email: [email protected]
Louis Panzer [email protected]
Executive Director, North Carolina 811, 5009 High Point Rd., Greensboro, NC 27407. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share