Case Studies
May 14, 2020

Enhancing BIM-Based Information Interoperability: Dispute Resolution from Legal and Contractual Perspectives

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146, Issue 7

Abstract

Building information modeling (BIM) produces positive results for the construction delivery process. BIM obtains these types of results by enabling information interoperability in respect of a building or facility throughout its life cycle phases starting at the conceptual design, continuing to facility management, and, in particular, dealing with contractual challenges for BIM-based construction projects. In spite of these compelling contributions by BIM in optimizing construction processes, their complexity leaves them still vulnerable to risk and uncertainty from unforeseen circumstances. The case study presented in this paper has developed insights into the implications of enhancing information interoperability by assessing the following categories of BIM-based contractual issues: (1) technology compatibility, (2) auditing procedures, (3) responsibilities, information and communication technology (ICT) protocols, and processes, and (4) transfer procedures. Project documents were reviewed followed by semistructured interviews with eight relevant project stakeholders to enable data triangulation. The set of results obtained was based on adopting the hierarchical Jaccard’s coefficient cluster analysis that then initiated a starting point from which a more comprehensive data interpretation was developed. Several new codes emerged from the session. Respondents described BIM as a new strategic management innovation, and they discussed the need to consider legal aspects when devising BIM contracts. The strategies were then consolidated into a model data validation conceptual framework as a means of protecting the data from loss, corruption, and/or manipulation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information on the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

This research project was financially supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (UTM-FRGS Grant No. 4F951) under the Ministry of Education, Malaysia.

References

Abdirad, H. 2015. “Advancing in building information modeling (BIM) contracting: Trends in the AEC/FM industry.” In Proc., AEI 2015, 1–12. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479070.001.
Abd Jamil, A. H., and M. S. Fathi. 2018. “Contractual challenges for BIM-based construction projects: A systematic review.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 8 (4): 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-12-2017-0131.
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2013. Building information modeling and digital data exhibit. Washington, DC: AIA.
Al-Shammari, M. A. 2014. “An appraisal of the protocol that was published by the construction industry council (CIC) to facilitate the use of building information modelling (BIM) on projects.” In Proc., 30th Annual ARCOM Conf., 623–632. Glasgow, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Aouad, G., S. Wu, and A. Lee. 2011. Computer aided design guide for architecture engineering and construction. Florence, KY: Routledge.
Araszkiewicz, K. 2017. “Digital technologies in facility management—The state of practice and research challenges.” Procedia Eng. 196: 1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.059.
Ashcraft, H. W. 2008. “Building information modeling: A framework for collaboration.” Constr. Lawyer 28 (3): 1–14.
Azhar, S., M. Khalfan, and T. Maqsood. 2012. “Building information modelling (BIM): Now and beyond.” Constr. Econ. Build. 12 (4): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v12i4.3032.
Becerik-Gerber, B., F. Jazizadeh, N. Li, and G. Calis. 2012. “Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (3): 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000433.
Bosch-Sijtsema, P., A. Isaksson, M. Lennartsson, and H. C. Linderoth. 2017. “Barriers and facilitators for BIM use among Swedish medium-sized contractors: ‘We wait until someone tells us to use it’.” Visual. Eng. 5 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-017-0040-7.
Chong, H. Y., S. L. Fan, M. Sutrisna, S. H. Hsieh, and C. M. Tsai. 2017. “Preliminary contractual framework for BIM-enabled projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (7): 04017025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001278.
CIOB (Chartered Institution of Building). 2013. Complex projects contract 2013. Bracknell, UK: CIOB.
ConsensusDocs. 2008. ConsensusDocs guidebook: Building information modelling (BIM) addendum. Arlington, VA: ConsensusDocs.
De la Garza, J. M., and D. A. Krueger. 2007. “Simulation of highway renewal asset management strategies.” In Proc., Int. Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering 2007, 527–541. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40937(261)63.
Eastman, C., Y. Jeong, R. Sacks, and I. Kaner. 2010. “Exchange model and exchange object concepts for implementation of national BIM standards.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24 (1): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2010)24:1(25).
Eastman, C., P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston. 2011. BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. New York: Wiley.
Gallaher, M. P., A. C. O’Connor, J. L. Dettbarn, and L. T. Gilday. 2004. Cost analysis of inadequate interoperability in the US capital facilities industry. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Grilo, A., and R. Jardim-Goncalves. 2011. “Challenging electronic procurement in the AEC sector: A BIM-based integrated perspective.” Autom. Constr. 20 (2): 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.008.
Hartley, J. 2004. “Case study research.” In Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research, edited by C. Cassell and G. Symon, 323. London: Sage.
Hwang, B. G., X. Zhao, and K. W. Yang. 2019. “Effect of BIM on rework in construction projects in Singapore status quo, magnitude, impact, and strategies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (2): 04018125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001600.
Isa, R., F. Emuze, D. Das, and B. O. Awuzie. 2018. “Modeling a transformational route to infrastructure sustainability in South Africa.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 8 (2): 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2016-0070.
Jardim-Goncalves, R., and A. Grilo. 2010. “SOA4BIM: Putting the building and construction industry in the single European information space, special issue BIM and interoperability.” Autom. Constr. 19 (4): 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.009.
Joyce, R., and D. Houghton. 2014. “Briefing: Building information modelling and the law.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Manage. Procurement Law 167 (3): 114–116. https://doi.org/10.1680/mpal.14.00012.
Jung, Y., and M. Joo. 2011. “Building information modelling (BIM) framework for practical implementation.” Autom. Constr. 20 (2): 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.010.
Kassem, M., G. Kelly, N. Dawood, M. Surginson, and S. Lockley. 2015. “BIM in facilities management applications: A case study of a large university complex.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 5 (3): 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-02-2014-0011.
Koch, C., and S. Beemsterboer. 2017. “Making an engine: Performativities of building information standards.” Build. Res. Inf. 45 (6): 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1301745.
Kuiper, I., and D. Holzer. 2013. “Rethinking the contractual context for building information modelling (BIM) in the Australian built environment industry.” Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build. 13 (4): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v13i4.3630.
Larson, D., and K. Golden. 2007. “Entering the brave new world: An introduction to contracting for building information modeling.” Mitchell Law Rev. 75: 75–108.
Lee, C. Y., H.-Y. Chong, and X. Wang. 2018. “Enhancing BIM performance in EPC projects through integrative trust-based functional contracting model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (7): 06018002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001521.
Manderson, A., M. Jefferies, and G. Brewer. 2015. “Building information modelling and standardized construction contracts: A content analysis of the GC21 contract.” Constr. Econ. Build. 15 (3): 72–84. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v15i3.4608.
McAdam, B. 2010. “Building information modelling: The UK legal context.” Int. J. Law Built Environ. 2 (3): 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561451011087337.
Miettinen, R., H. Kerosuo, T. Metsälä, and S. Paavola. 2018. “Bridging the life cycle: A case study on facility management infrastructures and uses of BIM.” J. Facil. Manage. 16 (1): 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-04-2017-0017.
NBS (National Building Specification). 2016. “NBS National BIM report 2016.” Accessed May 17, 2019. https://www.thenbs.com/knowledge/national-bim-report-2016.
Olatunji, O. A. 2011. “A preliminary review on the legal implications of BIM and model ownership.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 16 (3): 687–696.
Pärn, E. A., D. J. Edwards, and M. C. P. Sing. 2017. “The building information modelling trajectory in facilities management: A review.” Autom. Constr. 75 (Mar): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.12.003.
Rajoo, S. 2010. “The PAM 2006 standard form of building contract: A change in risk allocation.” Malayan Law J. 4: 147–160.
RIBA (Royal Institute of British Architects). 2012. BIM overlay to the RIBA outline plan of work. London: RIBA Publishing.
Sebastian, R. 2011. “Changing roles of the clients, architects and contractors through BIM.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 18 (2): 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981111111148.
Sieminski, J. 2007. Liability and BIM best practices. Pittsburgh: AIA Pittsburgh.
Stake, R. E. 1995. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stapleton, K. A. J., B. J. Gledson, and Z. Alwan. 2014. “Understanding technological interoperability through observations of data leakage in building information modelling (BIM) based transactions.” In Proc., 32nd eCAADe Conf., edited by E. Thompson, 515–524. Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK: Northumbria Univ.
Sweet, J., and M. Schneier. 2013. Legal aspects of architecture, engineering and the construction process. 9th ed. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
Thabet, W., and J. Lucas. 2017. “Asset data handover for a large educational institution: Case-study approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (11): 05017017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001389.
Volk, R., J. Stengel, and F. Schultmann. 2014. “Building information modeling (BIM) for existing buildings: Literature review and future needs.” Autom. Constr. 38 (Mar): 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.023.
Wetzel, E. M., and W. Y. Thabet. 2015. “The use of a BIM-based framework to support safe facility management processes.” Autom. Constr. 60 (Dec): 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.09.004.
Whyte, A., and J. Donaldson. 2015. “Digital model data distribution in civil engineering contracts.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 5 (3): 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-02-2014-0009.
Yin, R. 2009. Case study research design and methods. 4th ed. London: Sage.
Zadeh, P. A., G. Wang, H. B. Cavka, S. Staub-French, and R. Pottinger. 2017. “Information quality assessment for facility management.” Adv. Eng. Inf. 33 (Aug): 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2017.06.003.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146Issue 7July 2020

History

Received: Sep 11, 2019
Accepted: Jan 31, 2020
Published online: May 14, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 14, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ahmad Huzaimi Abd Jamil [email protected]
Ph.D. Graduate Student, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Level 7, Razak Tower, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia; Faculty of Industrial Management, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang 26300, Malaysia. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Level 7, Razak Tower, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia; Occupational Safety, Health and Environment Unit, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya, Petra, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0474-6278. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share