Abstract

The unique nature of construction projects can mean that construction activities often suffer from duration and cost variability. Because this variability is unplanned, it can present a problem when attempting to complete a project on time and on budget. Various factors causing this variability have been identified in the literature, but they predominantly refer to the nature and/or context of the whole project rather than specific activities. In this paper, the order of magnitude of and correlation between activity duration and cost variability is analyzed in 101 construction projects with over 5,000 activities. To do this, the first four moments (mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis) of actual versus planned duration and cost (log) ratios are analyzed by project, phase of execution, and activity type. Results suggest that, contrary to common wisdom, construction activities do not end late on average. Instead, the large variability in the activity duration is the major factor causing significant project delays and cost overruns. The values of average activity duration and cost variability gathered in this study will also serve as a reference for construction managers to improve future construction planning and project simulation studies with more realistic data.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the published article or Supplemental Data.

Acknowledgments

The first author acknowledges the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities for his Ramon y Cajal contract (RYC-2017-22222) cofunded by the European Social Fund. This work was also supported by the second author’s “Estancias de movilidad en el extranjero José Castillejo para jóvenes doctores, 2017 (Grant Ref. CAS17/00488)” and the fourth author’s “Estancias de profesores e investigadores senior en centros extranjeros Salvador de Madariaga 2018 (Grant Ref. PRX18/00381),” both from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities. The first and last authors also acknowledge the help received by the research group TEP-955 from the PAIDI (Junta de Andalucía, Spain).

References

AlSehaimi, A., and L. Koskela. 2008. “What can be learned from studies on delay in construction?” In Proc., 16th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 95–106. Salford, UK: Univ. of Salford.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P. 2017a. “M-PERT: Manual project-duration estimation technique for teaching scheduling basics.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (9): 04017063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001358.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P. 2017b. “Modelling the boundaries of project fast-tracking.” Autom. Constr. 84 (Dec): 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.006.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., M. L. Campo-Hitschfeld, D. Mora-Melià, and D. Domínguez. 2015. “Modeling bidding competitiveness and position performance in multi-attribute construction auctions.” Oper. Res. Perspect. 2 (1): 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2015.02.001.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., G. D. Larsen, and M. C. González-Cruz. 2018a. “Do projects really end late? On the shortcomings of the classical scheduling techniques.” J. Technol. Sci. Educ. 8 (1): 86–102. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.303.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., Y. A. Rojas-Céspedes, W. Hughes, S. Kabiri, E. Pellicer, D. Mora-Melià, and M. L. del Campo-Hitschfeld. 2017. “Weather-wise. A weather-aware planning tool for improving construction productivity and dealing with claims.” Autom. Constr. 84 (Dec): 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.022.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., S. T. Smith, J. G. Lloyd-Papworth, and P. Cooke. 2018b. “Incorporating the effect of weather in construction scheduling and management with sine wave curves: Application in the United Kingdom.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 36 (12): 666–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1478109.
Banerjee, A., and A. Paul. 2008. “On path correlation and PERT bias.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189 (3): 1208–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.061.
Batselier, J., and M. Vanhoucke. 2015. “Construction and evaluation framework for a real-life project database.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (3): 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.09.004.
Bein, W. W., J. Kamburowski, and M. F. M. Stallmann. 1992. “Optimal reduction of two-terminal directed acyclic graphs.” SIAM J. Comput. 21 (6): 1112–1129. https://doi.org/10.1137/0221065.
Cho, S. 2009. “A linear Bayesian stochastic approximation to update project duration estimates.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196 (2): 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.04.019.
Chudley, R., and R. Greeno. 2016. Building construction handbook. 11th ed. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Davies, E. M. 1973. “An experimental investigation of resource allocation in multiactivity projects.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 24 (4): 587–591. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1973.107.
Dodin, B., and M. Sirvanci. 1990. “Stochastic networks and the extreme value distribution.” Comput. Oper. Res. 17 (4): 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(90)90018-3.
Elmaghraby, S. E. 2000. “On criticality and sensitivity in activity networks.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 127 (2): 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00483-X.
Elmaghraby, S. E., Y. Fathi, and M. R. Taner. 1999. “On the sensitivity of project variability to activity mean duration.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 62 (3): 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00241-2.
George, D., and P. Mallery. 2010. SPSS for windows step-by-step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update. Boston: Pearson.
Hajdu, M., and O. Bokor. 2014. “The effects of different activity distributions on project duration in PERT networks.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 119: 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.086.
Hajdu, M., and O. Bokor. 2016. “Sensitivity analysis in PERT networks: Does activity duration distribution matter?” Autom. Constr. 65 (May): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.01.003.
Hamzah, N., M. A. Khoiry, I. Arshad, N. M. Tawil, and A. I. Che Ani. 2011. “Cause of construction delay: Theoretical framework.” Procedia Eng. 20 (Jan): 490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.192.
Keane, P. J., and A. F. Caletka. 2008. Delay analysis in construction contracts. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Khamooshi, H., and D. F. Cioffi. 2013. “Uncertainty in task duration and cost estimates: Fusion of probabilistic forecasts and deterministic scheduling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (5): 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000616.
Love, P. E. D., R. Lopez, J. T. Kim, and M. J. Kim. 2014. “Probabilistic assessment of design error costs.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (3): 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000439.
Love, P. E. D., and C.-P. Sing. 2013. “Determining the probability distribution of rework costs in construction and engineering projects.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 9 (11): 1136–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.667420.
MacCrimmon, K. R., and C. A. Ryavec. 1964. “An analytical study of the PERT assumptions.” Oper. Res. 12 (1): 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.12.1.16.
Mahamid, I., A. Bruland, and N. Dmaidi. 2012. “Causes of delay in road construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 28 (3): 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000096.
Mastor, A. A. 1970. “An experimental investigation and comparative evaluation of production line balancing techniques.” Manage. Sci. 16 (11): 728–746. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.16.11.728.
Ogunlana, S. O., K. Promkuntong, and V. Jearkjirm. 1996. “Construction delays in a fast-growing economy: Comparing Thailand with other economies.” Int. J. Project Manage. 14 (1): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00052-6.
Orangi, A., E. Palaneeswaran, and J. Wilson. 2011. “Exploring delays in Victoria-based Australian pipeline projects.” Procedia Eng. 14 (Jan): 874–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.111.
OR-AS.be. 2018. “Real project data.” Accessed April 23, 2019. http://www.projectmanagement.ugent.be/research/data/realdata.
Pascoe, T. 1966. “Allocation of resources: CPM.” Rev. Française Recherche Opérationnelle 38: 31–38.
Project Management Institute. 2017. Project management body of knowledge (PMBOK) guide. 6th ed. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Senouci, A., A. Ismail, and N. Eldin. 2016. “Time delay and cost overrun in Qatari public construction projects.” Procedia Eng. 164 (Jan): 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.632.
Trietsch, D., L. Mazmanyan, L. Gevorgyan, and K. R. Baker. 2012. “Modeling activity times by the Parkinson distribution with a lognormal core: Theory and validation.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 216 (2): 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.054.
Valadares Tavares, L., J. Antunes Ferreira, and J. Silva Coelho. 1999. “The risk of delay of a project in terms of the morphology of its network.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 119 (2): 510–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00150-2.
Vanhoucke, M. 2008. “Measuring time using novel earned value management metrics.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 22nd IPMA World Congress, 99–103. Nijkerk, Netherlands: International Project Management Association.
Vanhoucke, M. 2012. Project management with dynamic scheduling. Berlin: Springer.
Vanhoucke, M., J. Coelho, and J. Batselier. 2016. “An overview of project data for integrated project management and control.” J. Mod. Project Manage. 3 (3): 6–21.
Vanhoucke, M., and S. Vandevoorde. 2009. “Forecasting a project’s duration under various topological structures.” Measurable News, October 29, 2012.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 146Issue 1January 2020

History

Received: Feb 1, 2019
Accepted: May 17, 2019
Published online: Nov 9, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Apr 9, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ramon y Cajal Senior Researcher, Dpto. de Ingeniería Mecánica y Diseño Industrial, Universidad de Cádiz, Avda. Univ. de Cádiz 10, Puerto Real, Cádiz 11519, Spain (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4629-9664. Email: [email protected]
E. Sanz-Ablanedo, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dpto. Tecnología Minera, Topográfica y Estructuras, Universidad de León, Avda. Astorga, s/n., Ponferrada, León 24400, Spain. Email: [email protected]
R. Soetanto, Ph.D. [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough Univ., Loughborough LE11 6DF, UK. Email: [email protected]
Ma. C. González-Cruz, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Grupo de Investigación en Diseño y Dirección de Proyectos, Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia 46022, Spain. Email: [email protected]
G. D. Larsen, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of the Built Environment, Univ. of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6DF, UK. Email: [email protected]
A. Cerezo-Narváez, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dpto. de Ingeniería Mecánica y Diseño Industrial, Universidad de Cádiz, Avda. Univ. de Cádiz 10, Puerto Real, Cádiz 11519, Spain. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share