Technical Papers
Sep 12, 2019

Dealing with Contract Variations in PPPs: Social Mechanisms and Contract Management in Infrastructure Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145, Issue 11

Abstract

Variations are inevitable in public–private partnerships (PPP), due to the extensive duration of these contracts and the dynamic environment in which PPPs are usually implemented. Changes may lead to variations in the contract and consequently adverse reactions by partners. For the social and financial viability of the project, it is important to have mechanisms that can actively deal with variations that occur during the project life cycle. However, formal contracts with standardized project procedures do not always offer effective ways to cope with potential project dynamism. This paper presents the results of an in-depth case study into the modus operandi of a large-scale PPP infrastructure project with regard to variations in the realization phase. It was found that variations in infrastructure projects could not be dealt with solely through the formal contract rules, but that additional social mechanisms between the public commissioners and contracted companies were needed. Changes and contractual mechanisms are extensively discussed in project management literature. Also, the use of social mechanisms—complementary to the formal contract rules—is stressed. However, the literature offers little evidence about how these dealing mechanisms work in practice. This study reflects a real-life practice in responding to variations in a PPP and presents different ways in which various mechanisms, such as contract provisions, human relationships, organizational structure, digital tools, professional knowledge, and actor competences are interactively employed by project managers to deal with variation. General conclusions are drawn about the mechanisms observed, which may be applicable in the coordination of future interaction in public and private collaborations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported and funded by Rijkswaterstaat and the Deltas, Infrastructure and Mobility Initiative (DIMI) initiated by the Delft University of Technology. Preliminary findings of this case were presented at the sixth International Symposium on Life-Cycle Civil Engineering 2018.

References

Brown, T. L., M. Potoski, and D. Van Slyke. 2015. “Managing complex contracts: A theoretical approach.” J. Publ. Administration Res. Theory 26 (2): 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv004.
Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cruz, C. O., and R. C. Marques. 2013. “Flexible contracts to cope with uncertainty in public-private partnerships.” Int. J. Project Manage. 31 (3): 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.006.
Cruz, C. O., R. C. Marques, and P. Cardoso. 2014. “Empirical evidence for renegotiation of PPP contracts in the road sector.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 7 (2): 05014003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000151.
Cui, C., Y. Liu, A. Hope, and J. Wang. 2018. “Review of studies on the public-private partnership (PPP) for infrastructure projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 36 (5): 773–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.004.
Domingues, S., and D. Zlatkovic. 2015. “Renegotiating PPP contracts: Reinforcing the ‘p’ in partnership.” Transp. Rev. 35 (2): 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.992495.
Domingues, S., D. Zlatkovic, and A. Roumboutsos. 2015. “Forms of flexibility in transport infrastructure PPPs.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Public-Private Partnerships, edited by Z. Zhang, C. A. V. Queiroz, and C. M. Walton, 597–612. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building theories from case study research.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 (4): 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385.
Eurostat. 2016. The statistical treatment of PPP contracts: Manual on Government Deficit and Debt. Brussels, Belgium: Publications Office of the European Union.
Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five misunderstandings about case study research.” Qual. Inq. 12 (2): 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363.
Gustafsson, J. 2017. “Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study.” Accessed February 10, 2018. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1064378/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
Hart, O. 2017. “Incomplete contracts and control.” Am. Econ. Rev. 107 (7): 1731–1752. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.107.7.1731.
Hertogh, M. J. C. M., and Westerveld, E. 2010. “Playing with complexity. Management and organisation of large infrastructural projects.” Ph.D. thesis, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus Univ. of Rotterdam.
HM Treasury. 2012. Standardization of PF2 contracts. London: Stationery Office.
Iossa, E. 2015. “Contract and procurement design for PPPs in highways: The road ahead.” Econ. Political Ind. 42 (3): 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-015-0014-5.
Javed, A. A., P. T. I. Lam, and A. P. C. Chan. 2014. “Change negotiation in public private partnership projects through output specifications: An experimental approach based on game theory.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 32 (4): 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.895846.
Khan, K. I. A., R. Flanagan, and S. L. Lu. 2016. “Managing information complexity using system dynamics on construction projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 34 (3): 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1190026.
Klijn, E. H., and J. Koppenjan. 2016. “The impact of contract characteristics on the performance of public-private partnerships: Results from a survey among PPP projects in The Netherlands.” Publ. Money Manage. 36 (6): 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1206756.
Klijn, E. H., and J. M. F. Koppenjan. 2016. Governance networks in public sector. London: Routledge.
Kumaraswamy, M., and M. Rahman. 2006. “Applying teamworking models to projects.” In The management of complex projects, a relationship approach, edited by S. D. Pryke and H. J. Smyth. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ling, F. Y. Y., Y. Ke, M. M. Kumaraswamy, and S. Q. Wang. 2014. “Key relational contracting practices affecting performance of public construction projects in China.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (1): 04013034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000781.
Liu, J., R. Gao, and C. Y. C. Cheah. 2017. “Pricing mechanism of early termination of PPP projects based on real option theory.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (6): 04017035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000556.
Liu, J., P. E. D. Love, J. Smith, M. Regan, and P. R. Davis. 2014. “Life cycle critical success factors for public-private partnership infrastructure projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (5): 04014073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000307.
Mandri-Perrott, X. C. 2009. “Optimising project finance solutions in the water sector: Suggestions for enhanced public private partnership.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Univ. of Groningen.
Mistarihi, A. M., M. S. Al Refai, B. A. Al Qaid, and M. A. Qeed. 2012. “Competency requirements for managing public private partnerships (PPPs): The case of infrastructure projects in Jordan.” Int. J. Bus. Manage. 7 (12): 60. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n12p60.
Mouraviev, N., and N. K. Kakabadse. 2015. “Legal and regulatory barriers to effective public-private partnership governance in Kazakhstan.” Int. J. Public Sect. Manage. 28 (3): 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2014-0116.
National Audit Office. 2018. HM treasury: PFI and PFI2. London: National Audit Office.
Neto, D. C. S., C. O. Cruz, F. Rodrigues, and P. Silva. 2016. “Bibliometric analysis of PPP and PFI literature: Overview of 25 years of research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (10): 06016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001163.
New Zealand Government, The Treasury. 2013. Contractual framework for the standard form public private partnership project agreement. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Government, The Treasury.
Nowell, L. S., J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules. 2017. “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.” Int. J. Qual. Methods 16 (1): 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.
Rijkswaterstaat. 2014. Model DBFM agreement. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Government of the Netherlands.
Sarmento, J. M., and L. Renneboog. 2016. “Anatomy of public-private partnerships: Their creation, financing and renegotiations.” Int. J. Manage. Project Bus. 9 (1): 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-03-2015-0023.
Shipton, C., W. Hughes, and D. Tutt. 2014. “Change management in practice: An ethnographic study of changes to contract requirements on a hospital project.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 32 (7–8): 787–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.915336.
Shrestha, A., T.-K. Chan, A. A. Aibinu, C. Chen, and I. Martek. 2018. “Risk allocation inefficiencies in Chinese PPP water projects.” J. Construct. Eng. Manage. 144 (4): 04018013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001457.
Song, J., Y. Hu, and Z. Feng. 2018. “Factors influencing early termination of PPP projects in China.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (1): 05017008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000572.
Spiller, P. T. 2018. An institutional theory of public contracts: Regulatory implications. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Taleb, N. N. 2008. The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable (Vol. 2). New York: Random House.
Xiong, W., and X. Zhang. 2014. “Concession renegotiation models for projects developed through public-private partnerships.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (5): 04014008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000843.
Xiong, W., and X. Zhang. 2016. “The real option value of renegotiation in public-private partnerships.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (8): 04016021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000843.
Xiong, W., X. Zhao, and H. Wang. 2018. “Information asymmetry in renegotiation of public-private partnership projects.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 32 (4): 04018028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000763.
Yin, R. K. 2014. Case study research design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Zou, W., M. Kumaraswamy, J. Chung, and J. Wong. 2014. “Identifying the critical success factors for relationship management in PPP projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (2): 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145Issue 11November 2019

History

Received: Oct 9, 2018
Accepted: Mar 21, 2019
Published online: Sep 12, 2019
Published in print: Nov 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Feb 12, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Researcher, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft Univ. of Technology, Stevinweg 1, Delft, CN 2628, Netherlands (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6893-8383. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Twente, De Horst 2, Enschede 7522 NB, Netherlands. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2766-3763. Email: [email protected]
Wim Leendertse, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Groningen Univ., Landleven 1, Groningen 9747 AD, Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
Marcel Hertogh, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, CN 2628, Netherlands. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share