Prioritizing Construction Risks Using Fuzzy AHP in Brazilian Public Enterprises
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145, Issue 2
Abstract
Risks capable of impacting project objectives are intrinsic to the construction industry. Effective risk analysis has key importance to professionals concerned with construction goals, especially in public enterprises, given the amount of money invested and the demand for modern infrastructure. Therefore, this study aims to identify the main public construction risks and present a practical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model to prioritize these risks in Brazilian public enterprises. The model is divided into three steps: (1) risk identification and development of the risk breakdown structure, (2) pairwise comparisons, and (3) risk prioritization. Throughout the case study, 54 risks were identified, which were organized into eight categories. The major risk in the Brazilian scenario was “difficulty in environmental licensing.” Although this study focused on a specific context, its methodology provides a reliable and practical framework that can be adjusted to various construction projects worldwide to assess risks. Additionally, the identified risks can provide sound guidance to practitioners globally, because their elicitation was based on studies concerning different countries.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the collaboration of all nine experts (brainstorming panelists and SME group members), whose knowledge and expertise were fundamental to the success of this research. The first author would also like to acknowledge the Coordination of Superior Level Improvement (Capes) for the sponsorship provided during his master’s studies.
References
Abdelgawad, M., and A. R. Fayek. 2010. “Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (9): 1028–1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000210.
Azevedo, R. C., L. Ensslin, and A. E. Jungles. 2014. “A review of risk management in construction: Opportunities for improvement.” Modern Economy 5 (4): 367–383. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2014.54036.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., M. Skitmore, E. Pellicer, and M. C. González-Cruz. 2015. “Scoring rules and abnormally low bids criteria in construction tenders: A taxonomic review.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 33 (4): 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1059951.
Ballesteros-Pérez, P., M. Skitmore, E. Pellicer, and X. Zhang. 2016. “Scoring rules and competitive behavior in best-value construction auctions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (9): 04016035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001144.
Boateng, P., Z. Chen, and S. O. Ogunlana. 2015. “An analytical network process model for risks prioritisation in megaprojects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (8): 1795–1811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.08.007.
Bowen, P. A., P. J. Edwards, and K. Cattell. 2012. “Corruption in the South African construction industry: A thematic analysis of verbatim comments from survey participants.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 30 (10): 885–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.711909.
Buckley, J. J. 1985. “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17 (3): 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9.
Bu-Qammaz, A. S., I. Dikmen, and M. T. Birgonul. 2009. “Risk assessment of international construction projects using the analytic network process.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 36 (7): 1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.1139/L09-061.
Carr, V., and J. H. M. Tah. 2001. “A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment and analysis: Construction project risk management system.” Adv. Eng. Software 32 (10–11): 847–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(01)00036-9.
Chan, A. P. C., and E. K. Owusu. 2017. “Corruption forms in the construction industry: Literature review.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (8): 04017057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001353.
Chen, Z., H. Li, H. Ren, Q. Xu, and J. Hong. 2011. “A total environmental risk assessment model for international hub airports.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (7): 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.03.004.
Cretu, O., R. Stewart, and T. Berends. 2011. Risk management for design and construction. Hoboken, NJ: RS Means.
Ebrat, M., and R. Ghodsi. 2014. “Construction project risk assessment by using adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system: An empirical study.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 18 (5): 1213–1227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0139-5.
Elbarkouky, M. M. G., A. R. Fayek, N. B. Siraj, and N. Sadegho. 2016. “Fuzzy arithmetic risk analysis approach to determine construction project contingency.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (12): 04016070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001191.
Flyvbjerg, B., M. S. Holm, and S. Buhl. 2007. “Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie?” J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 68 (3): 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976273.
Hsieh, T. Y., S. T. Lu, and G. H. Tzeng. 2004. “Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings.” Int. J. Project Manage. 22 (7): 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.002.
Hwang, B. G., X. Zhao, and S. Ong. 2015. “Value management in Singaporean building projects: Implementation status, critical success factors, and risk factors.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (6): 04014094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000342.
ISO. 2009. Risk management: Risk assessment techniques. ISO 31010:2009. Geneva: ISO.
Jato-Espino, D., E. C. Lopez, J. R. Hernandez, and J. C. C. Jordana. 2014. “A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction.” Autom. Constr. 45: 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.013.
Jin, X.-H. 2011. “Model for efficient risk allocation in privately financed public infrastructure projects using neuro-fuzzy techniques.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (11): 1003–1014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000365.
Jin, X.-H., and G. Zhang. 2011. “Modelling optimal risk allocation in PPP projects using artificial neural networks.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (5): 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.011.
Kahraman, C. 2008. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making: Theory and applications with recent developments. New York: Springer.
Khazaeni, G., M. Khanzadi, and A. Afshar. 2012. “Fuzzy adaptive decision making model for selection balanced risk allocation.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (4): 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.10.003.
Klir, G. J., and B. Yuan. 1995. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kuo, Y. C., and S. T. Lu. 2013. “Using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approach to enhance risk assessment for metropolitan construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 31 (4): 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.003.
Le, Y., M. Shan, A. P. C. Chan, and Y. Hu. 2014. “Investigating the causal relationships between causes of and vulnerabilities to corruption in the Chinese public construction sector.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (9): 05014007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000886.
Lee, S. 2015. “Determination of priority weights under multiattribute decision-making situations: AHP versus fuzzy AHP.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (2): 05014015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000897.
Li, F., K. K. Phoon, X. Du, and M. Zhang. 2013a. “Improved AHP method and its application in risk identification.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (3): 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000605.
Li, H. X., M. Al-Hussein, Z. Lei, and Z. Ajweh. 2013b. “Risk identification and assessment of modular construction utilizing fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and simulation.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 40 (12): 1184–1195. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0013.
Li, J., and P. X. W. Zou. 2011. “Fuzzy AHP-based risk assessment: methodology for PPP projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (12): 1205–1209. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000362.
Liu, J., X. Zhao, and P. Yan. 2016. “Risk paths in international construction projects: Case study from Chinese contractors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (6): 05016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001116.
Lu, S.-T., C.-W. Lin, and P.-H. Ko. 2007. “Application of analytic network process (ANP) in assessing construction risk of urban bridge project.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Innovative Computing, Information and Control (ICIC 2007), 169. New York: IEEE.
Mon, D. L., C. H. Cheng, and J. C. Lin. 1994. “Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 62 (2): 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90052-3.
Nieto-Morote, A., and F. Ruz-Vila. 2011. “A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (2): 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.002.
Pawan, P., and P. Lorterapong. 2016. “A fuzzy-based integrated framework for assessing time contingency in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (3): 04015083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001073.
Pedrycz, W. 1994. “Why triangular membership functions?” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 64 (1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90003-5.
PMI (Project Management Institute). 2013. A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Philadelphia: PMI.
Rahimi, Y., R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, S. H. Iranmanesh, and M. Vaez-Alaei. 2018. “Hybrid approach to construction project risk management with simultaneous FMEA/ISO 31000/evolutionary algorithms: Empirical optimization study.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (6): 04018043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001486.
Saaty, T. L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. London: McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. 1990. “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48 (1): 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
Saaty, T. L. 1994. “Highlights and critical points in the theory and applications of the analytic hierarchy process.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 74 (3): 426–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90222-4.
Saaty, T. L., and L. T. Tran. 2007. “On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy process.” Math. Comput. Model. 46 (7–8): 962–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.022.
Signor, R., P. E. D. Love, and O. Olatunji. 2016. “Determining overpricing in Brazilian infrastructure projects: A forensic approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (9): 06016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001156.
Silva, D. C., D. A. Milhomem, T. F. A. Oliveira, and D. M. Sampaio. 2015. “Hierarquização de riscos de projetos pertencentes ao programa Minha Casa Minha Vida [Prioritizing project risks of the program My House My Life].” [In Portuguese.] In SIBRAGEC ELAGEC. São Carlos, BR.
Taylan, O., A. O. Bafail, R. M. S. Abdulaal, and M. R. Kabli. 2014. “Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies.” Appl. Soft Comput. 17: 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003.
TCU (Tribunal de Contas da União) [Brazilian Federal Court of Auditors]. 2016. FISCOBRAS 2016: Fiscalização de obras públicas pelo TCU [FISCOBRAS 2016: Audit of public constructions by TCU]. [In Portuguese.] Brasilia, Brazil: TCU.
World Bank. 2008. Environmental licensing for hydroelectric projects in Brazil: A contribution to the debate. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Xia, N., R. Zhong, C. Wu, X. Wang, and S. Wang. 2017. “Assessment of stakeholder-related risks in construction projects: Integrated analyses of risk attributes and stakeholder influences.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (8): 04017030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001322.
Xu, Y., and H. Wang. 2013. “Eigenvector method, consistency test and inconsistency repairing for an incomplete fuzzy preference relation.” Appl. Math. Model. 37 (7): 5171–5183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.10.008.
Yang, Q., and Y. Wei. 2011. “Risk evaluation of highway engineering project based on the fuzzy-AHP.” In Vol. 8285 of Proc., Int. Conf. on Graphic and Image Processing, 82852O. SPIE Digital Library.
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control 8 (3): 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
Zayed, T., M. Amer, and J. Pan. 2008. “Assessing risk and uncertainty inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP.” Int. J. Project Manage. 26 (4): 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.012.
Zeng, J., M. An, and N. J. Smith. 2007. “Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (6): 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.006.
Zhang, G., and P. X. W. Zou. 2007. “Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process risk assessment approach for joint venture construction projects in China.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (10): 771–779. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:10(771).
Zou, P. X. W., Y. Chen, and T-Y. Chan. 2010. “Understanding and improving your risk management capability: Assessment model for construction organizations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 854–863. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000175.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145 • Issue 2 • February 2019
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 27, 2018
Accepted: Aug 10, 2018
Published online: Dec 5, 2018
Published in print: Feb 1, 2019
Discussion open until: May 5, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.