Practices for Designing Cross-Functional Teams for Integrated Project Delivery
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145, Issue 3
Abstract
For many years, project delivery methods have been studied in the construction industry to assess their impact on project performance, but few extend that focus to the effect of team composition and organization. However, many factors influence the need for integrated teams, as project needs change and new participants are added to the project. The objective of this study is to identify key organizational practices for the use of cross-functional teams in construction. Using a combination of expert interviews and case study observations, this paper presents the practices captured regarding the design of cross-functional teams and demonstrates how the case study project addressed each of the identified practices. Despite the limitations of generalizing findings inherent to a case study approach, it was necessary due to the limited opportunities to study integrated project delivery (IPD) projects. Cross-functional team performance in the case study has been assessed primarily by the capacity to meet commitments, both schedule and financial. The discussion reviews both the potential and the challenges for cross-functional team application outside of IPD contracts. This study finds that project teams should form cross-functional teams at the very early stages of the design in conjunction with a target value design approach. The cross-functional teams should engage interdisciplinary teams that focus on the main building or facility systems. While the number of teams varies with the project complexity, scope, and scale, the number is typically four to eight on most projects, and rarely more than 10. The suggested cross-functional team size is four to six people, with some variance based on the objectives and tasks they undertake. Leadership that brings a combination of cross-disciplinary knowledge to communicate effectively and strong facilitation skills, as well as the ability to coordinate with other cross-functional teams, is needed. Finally, the cross-functional organization combined with the IPD contract structure creates flexible capacity to allow the teams to evolve with the project needs, and to leverage the full potential of individuals to best suit the changing project dynamics with little administrative burden from contractual constraints inherent in other contractual arrangements.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the published paper. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the experts interview participants as well as the case study participants for allowing to work with them and learn from their experience. We would like to thank our reviewers for their thorough feedback, which has helped to shape and evolve this publication. We would also like to thank the Partnership for Achieving Construction Excellence for the support provided for this research.
References
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2010. Integrated project delivery: Case studies. Washington, DC: AIA.
Ammeter, A. P., and J. M. Dukerich. 2002. “Leadership, team building, and team member characteristics in high performance project teams.” Eng. Manage. J. 14 (4): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2002.11415178.
Ashcraft, H. W. 2012. The IPD framework. San Francisco: HansonBridgett.
Ballard, G., B. Dilsworth, D. Do, W. Low, J. Mobley, P. Phillips, D. Reed, Z. Sargent, P. Tillmann, and N. Wood. 2015. “How to make shared risk and reward sustainable.” In Proc., 23rd Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 257–266. Høgskoleringen, Norway: IGLC.net.
Ballard, G., and P. Reiser. 2004. “The St. Olaf College fieldhouse project: A case study in designing to target cost.” In Proc., 12th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction. Høgskoleringen, Norway: IGLC.net.
Barker, J., D. Tjosvold, and R. I. Andrews. 1988. “Conflict approaches of effective and ineffective project managers: A field study in a matrix organization.” J. Manage. Stud. 25 (2): 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00030.x.
Cheng, R., K., Dale, and C., Wingate 2015. Integration at its finest: Success in high-performance building design and project delivery in the federal sector. Washington, DC: US General Services Administration.
Denerolle, S. 2013. The application of target value design to the design phase of 3 hospital projects. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Denis, H. 1986. “Matrix structures, quality of working life, and engineering productivity.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. EM-33 (3): 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1986.6447663.
Do, D., G. Ballard, and I. D. Tommelein. 2015. “An analysis of potential misalignment of commercial incentives in integrated project delivery and target value design.” In Proc., 23rd Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, 277–286. Høgskoleringen, Norway: IGLC.net.
Eccles, R. G. 1981. “The quasifirm in the construction industry.” J. Econ. Behav. Organiz. 2 (4): 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(81)90013-5.
El-Asmar, M., A. S. Hanna, and W. Y. Loh. 2013. “Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (11): 04013012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000744.
Ford, R. C., and W. A. Randolph. 1992. “Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management.” J. Manage. 18 (2): 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800204.
Franz, B., R. Leicht, K. Molenaar, and J. Messner. 2017. “Impact of team integration and group cohesion on project delivery performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (1): 04016088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001219.
Greiner, L. E., and V. E. Schein. 1981. “The paradox of managing a project-oriented matrix: Establishing coherence within chaos.” Sloan Manage. Rev. 2 (2): 17–22.
Hall, D., A. Algiers, T. Lehtinen, R. E. Levitt, C. Li, and P. Padachuri. 2014. “The role of integrated project delivery in adoption of integral innovations.” In Proc., Engineering Project Organization Conf., 1–20. Brijuni, Croatia: Engineering Project Organization Society.
Henke, J. W., A. R. Krachenberg, and T. F. Lyons. 1993. “Perspective: Cross-functional teams: Good concept, poor implementation!” J. Prod. Innovation Manage. 10 (3): 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(93)90027-N.
Hoffman, R. R. 1989. “A survey of methods for eliciting the knowledge of experts.” SIGAT Newsletter.
Hoffman, R. R., N. R. Shadbolt, A. M. Burton, and G. Klein. 1995. “Eliciting knowledge from experts: A methodological analysis.” Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 62 (2): 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1039.
Joyce, W. F. 1986. “Matrix organization: A social experiment.” Acad. Manage. J. 29 (3): 536–561. https://doi.org/10.2307/256223.
Katz, R., and T. J. Allen. 1985. “Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix.” Acad. Manage. J. 28 (1): 67–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/256062.
Katzenbach, J. R., and D. K. Smith. 1993. “The discipline of teams.” Harv. Bus. Rev. 71 (2): 111–120.
Kenig, M. A. 2011. Project delivery systems for construction. Arlington, VA: AGC of America.
Kent, D. C., and B. Becerik-Gerber. 2010. “Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000188.
Kerzner, H. 1984. Project management a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Knight, K. 1976. “Matrix organizations: A review.” J. Manage. Stud. 13 (2): 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1976.tb00528.x.
Krajewsky, L. J., and L. P. Ritsman. 2005. Operations management: Processes and value chains. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Larson, E. W., and D. H. Gobeli. 1987. “Matrix management: Contradictions and insights.” California Manage. Rev. 29 (4): 126–138. https://doi.org/10.2307/41162135.
LCI (Lean Construction Institute). 2016. “LCI lean project delivery glossary.” Accessed May 18, 2018. https://www.leanconstruction.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/LCI_Glossary12232015.pdf.
Levitt, R. 2011. “Towards project management 2.0.” Eng. Project Organiz. J. 1 (3): 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2011.609558.
Lichtig, W. 2006. “The integrated agreement for lean project delivery.” Constr. Law 26: 25.
Seed, W. R. 2015. Transforming design and construction: A framework for change. Arlington, VA: Lean Construction Institute.
Sive, T., and M. Hays. 2009. Integrated project delivery: Reality and promise. a strategist’s guide to understanding and marketing IPD. Alexandria, VA: Society for Marketing Professional Services Foundation.
Struckenbruck, L. C. 1982. The implementation of project management: The professionals handbook. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Sy, T., and L. S. D’Annunzio. 2005. “Challenges and strategies of matrix organizations: Top-level and mid-level managers’ perspectives.” Hum. Resour. Plann. 28 (1): 39–48.
Tuckman, B. W. 1965. “Developmental sequence in small groups.” Psychol. Bull. 63 (6): 384.
UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc). 2014. Lean project: Delivery guide. King of Prussia, PA: UHS
Yin, R. K. 2002. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145 • Issue 3 • March 2019
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 15, 2017
Accepted: Aug 10, 2018
Published online: Jan 10, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jun 10, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.