Technical Papers
Nov 30, 2018

Delay Risk Assessment of Repetitive Construction Projects Using Line-of-Balance Scheduling and Monte Carlo Simulation

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145, Issue 2

Abstract

Although the line-of-balance (LOB) method is widely used for the scheduling of repetitive construction projects, there are only a limited number of studies that deal with the issue of how to incorporate uncertainty in repetitive schedules. In this paper, a delay risk assessment method is proposed for projects scheduled by LOB. In the proposed method, a LOB schedule is prepared considering the target rate of delivery, and then risk scenarios are defined considering the sources of uncertainty and vulnerability of activities. Next, probability distributions are determined for the required number of labor-hours for each activity and for learning rates, and finally, the delay risk of the project is quantified using Monte Carlo simulation. The application of the method, its outputs, and its potential benefits are demonstrated by a hypothetical case study. Moreover, the proposed method is applied to a real high-rise building project and the potential benefits of using a probabilistic LOB schedule at the planning stage are investigated. The findings reveal that the outputs of the proposed method may enable decision makers to estimate delay risk under various scenarios, formulate effective risk response strategies, and prepare contingency plans for resource utilization in repetitive tasks. However, the simplifying assumptions made during the development of the proposed model regarding the relationships between activity durations, risk scenarios, and learning rates may limit its applicability for all project conditions. Yet the method is generic, and its assumptions can be revised in consideration of specific project characteristics and objectives.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.

References

Agrama, F. A. 2014. “Multi-objective genetic optimization for scheduling a multi-story building.” Autom. Constr. 44 (Aug): 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.005.
Ammar, M. A., and A. F. Abdel-Maged. 2018. “Modeling of LOB scheduling with learning development effect.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 18 (6): 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1357350.
APM (Association for Project Management). 2004. Project risk analysis and management guide. Buckinghamshire, UK: APM Publishing.
Arditi, D., and M. Z. Albulak. 1986. “Line-of-balance scheduling in pavement construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 112 (3): 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1986)112:3(411).
Arditi, D., P. Sikangwan, and O. B. Tokdemir. 2002a. “Scheduling system for high rise building construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 20 (4): 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210131647.
Arditi, D., O. B. Tokdemir, and K. Suh. 2001. “Effect of learning on line-of-balance scheduling.” Int. J. Project Manage. 19 (5): 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00079-4.
Arditi, D., O. B. Tokdemir, and K. Suh. 2002b. “Challenges in line-of-balance scheduling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 128 (6): 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:6(545).
Bakhshi, J., V. Ireland, and A. Gorod. 2016. “Clarifying the project complexity construct: Past, present and future.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (7): 1199–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.002.
Damci, A., D. Arditi, and G. Polat. 2013a. “Multiresource leveling in line-of-balance scheduling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (9): 1108–1116. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000716.
Damci, A., D. Arditi, and G. Polat. 2013b. “Resource leveling in line-of-balance scheduling.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 28 (9): 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12038.
Damci, A., D. Arditi, and G. Polat. 2016. “Impacts of different objective functions on resource leveling in line-of-balance scheduling.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20 (1): 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0578-7.
Dillon, R. L., R. John, and D. von Winterfeldt. 2002. “Assessment of cost uncertainties for large technology projects: A methodology and an application.” Interfaces 32 (4): 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.32.4.52.56.
Dolabi, H. R. Z., A. Afshar, and R. Abbasnia. 2014. “CPM/LOB scheduling method for project deadline constraint satisfaction.” Autom. Constr. 48 (Dec): 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.09.003.
Duffy, G. A., G. D. Oberlender, and D. H. S. Jeong. 2011. “Linear scheduling model with varying production rates.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (8): 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000320.
Fidan, G., I. Dikmen, A. M. Tanyer, and M. T. Birgonul. 2011. “Ontology for relating risk and vulnerability to cost overrun in international projects.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 25 (4): 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000090.
Gouda, A., O. Hosny, and K. Nassar. 2017. “Optimal crew routing for linear repetitive projects using graph theory.” Autom. Constr. 81 (Sep): 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.007.
Gunduz, M., and A. F. Naser. 2017. “Cost based value stream mapping as a sustainable construction tool for underground pipeline construction projects.” Sustainability 9 (12): 2184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122184.
Harris, R. B., and P. G. Ioannou. 1998. “Scheduling projects with repeating activities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (4): 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:4(269).
Ioannou, P. G., and C. Srisuwanrat. 2007. “Probabilistic scheduling for repetitive projects.” In Proc., 15th Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction. Lansing, MI.
Ioannou, P. G., and I. Yang. 2016. “Repetitive scheduling method: Requirements, modeling, and implementation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (5): 04016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001107.
Maravas, A., and J. Pantouvakis. 2011. “Fuzzy repetitive scheduling method for projects with repeating activities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (7): 561–564. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000319.
Perminova, O., M. Gustafsson, and K. Wikström. 2008. “Defining uncertainty in projects—A new perspective.” Int. J. Project Manage. 26 (1): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.08.005.
Qazi, A., J. Quigley, A. Dickson, and K. Kirytopoulos. 2016. “Project complexity and risk management (ProCRiM): Towards modelling project complexity driven risk paths in construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (7): 1183–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.008.
Sacks, R., O. Seppanen, V. Priven, and J. Savosnick. 2017. “Construction flow index: A metric of production flow quality in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 35 (1–2): 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1274417.
Senouci, A., and H. Al-Derham. 2008. “Genetic algorithm-based multiobjective model for scheduling of linear construction projects.” Adv. Eng. Software 39 (12): 1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.08.002.
SRA (Society for Risk Analysis). 2015. “SRA glossary.” Accessed February 27, 2018. http://www.sra.org/sites/default/files/pdf/SRA_glossary_20150622.pdf.
Srisuwanrat, C., and P. G. Ioannou. 2007. “Optimal scheduling of probabilistic repetitive projects using completed unit and genetic algorithms.” In Proc., Winter 2007 Simulation Conf., 2151–2158. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Thomé, A. M. T., L. F. Scavarda, A. Scavarda, and F. E. S. D. S. Thomé. 2016. “Similarities and contrasts of complexity, uncertainty, risks, and resilience in supply chains and temporary multi-organization projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (7): 1328–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.10.012.
Tokdemir, O. B., D. Arditi, and C. Balcik. 2006. “ALISS: Advanced linear scheduling system.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 24 (12): 1253–1267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600953706.
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
Vidal, L. A., and F. Marle. 2008. “Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management.” Kybernetes 37 (8): 1094–1110. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920810884928.
Zhang, L., Y. Tang, and J. Qi. 2017. “Resource leveling based on backward controlling activity in line of balance.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2017: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7545980.
Zhang, L., X. Zou, and Z. Kan. 2014. “Improved strategy for resource allocation in repetitive projects considering the learning effect.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (11): 04014053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000896.
Zou, X., Q. Zhang, and L. Zhang. 2018. “Modeling and solving the deadline satisfaction problem in line-of-balance scheduling.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (1): 04017044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000565.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 145Issue 2February 2019

History

Received: Mar 12, 2018
Accepted: Jul 30, 2018
Published online: Nov 30, 2018
Published in print: Feb 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Apr 30, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara 06800, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-8560. Email: [email protected]
Huseyin Erol [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara 06800, Turkey. Email: [email protected]
Irem Dikmen [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara 06800, Turkey. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share