Case Studies
Aug 28, 2018

Risk Manageability Assessment to Improve Risk Response Plan: Case Study of Construction Projects in Iran

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 11

Abstract

The majority of qualitative risk assessment studies on construction projects assess manageability indicators (e.g., detectability, preventability, and controllability) independently of risk probability and impact, two main risk parameters. This study develops a model for assessing the risk manageability indicators by linking manageability to the chain of risks. Such risk manageability indicators may improve risk response plans. The chain of risks in the change-formation phase is used as the basis to determine why any change in a construction project is generally caused by a chain of risks. Focus is directed to the chain of risks in the change-formation phase that determine part of the probability of change. In this phase, final risks (causes) that correspond to uncertain events occur because of the presence of sources and drivers. This model defines a risk scenario as all paths between a source and a risk (cause). Drivers in the paths between sources and final risk are the signs of risk scenarios. This study evaluates the manageability indicators by using the observability of drivers of the chain of risks to define and assess two indices of detectability and trackability as two main components of the developed framework. These indices are used to improve the response plan to mitigate risk. Finally, to demonstrate the framework capabilities, a real construction project as an application example is analyzed. This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge through evaluating the manageability of risk scenarios by defining the relationship between risk sources and risk signs (drivers). It also helps to expand existing knowledge by developing an approach for identifying and mitigating risk causes after the observation of risk signs. This evaluation may alert project management teams in advance of risk occurrence so that they can take necessary actions to reduce the probability of the risk. The results indicate that a project team should be aware that after observing a driver (risk sign) in a project, parts of previous paths in which no driver is observed may lose their importance, and that the importance of some paths in which observed drivers exist intensifies. Moreover, a project team’s observations may sometimes reduce the importance of remaining paths and direct the team to concentrate on taking appropriate measures to enable immediate prevention from a scenario’s endpoint (cause).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001263.

References

Abdelgawad, M., and A. R. Fayek. 2010. “Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (9): 1028–1036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000210.
Ansoff, H. I. 1975. “Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals.” California Manage. Rev. 18 (2): 21–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164635.
Aven, T., J. Vinnem, and H. Wiencke. 2007. “A decision framework for risk management, with application to the offshore oil and gas industry.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92 (4): 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.12.009.
Cagno, E., F. Caron, and M. Mancini. 2007. “A multi-dimensional analysis of major risks in complex projects.” Risk Manage. 9 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8250014.
Charkhakan, M. H., and G. Heravi. 2012. “Identification of changes formation scenarios in construction projects based on changes occurrence paths analysis.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress (CRC), 427–436. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Condamin, L., J. P. Louisot, and P. Naïm. 2007. Risk quantification: Management, diagnosis and hedging. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Cooper, D. F., S. Grey, G. Raymond, and P. Walker. 2005. Project risk management guidelines. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Dikmen, I., M. T. Birgonul, and S. Han. 2007. “Using fuzzy risk assessment to rate cost overrun risk in international construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (5): 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.12.002.
El-Reedy, M. A. 2012. Construction management for industrial projects. 4th ed. Somerset, UK: Wiley.
Fan, M., N. P. Lin, and C. Sheu. 2008. “Choosing a project risk-handling strategy: An analytical model.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 112 (2): 700–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.06.006.
Fay, J. 2010. Contemporary security management. 3rd ed. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Franke, A. 1987. “Risk analysis in project management.” Int. J. Project Manage. 5 (1): 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(87)90007-X.
Haji-Kazemi, S., B. Andersen, and O. J. Klakegg. 2015. “Barriers against effective responses to early warning signs in projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (5): 1068–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.002.
Haji-Kazemi, S., B. Andersen, and H. P. Krane. 2013. “A review on possible approaches for detecting early warning signs in projects.” Project Manage. J. 44 (5): 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21360.
Han, S. H., D. Y. Kim, H. Kim, and W. S. Jang. 2008. “A web-based integrated system for international project risk management.” Autom. Constr. 17 (3): 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2007.05.012.
Heravi, G., and M. H. Charkhakan. 2014. “Predicting and tracing change-formation scenarios in construction projects using the DEMATEL technique.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (6): 04014028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000229.
Heravi, G., and M. H. Charkhakan. 2015. “Predicting change by evaluating the change implementation process in construction projects using event tree analysis.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (5): 04014081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000325.
Hillson, D. A., and D. T. Hulett. 2004. “Assessing risk probability: Alternative approaches.” In Proc., PMI Global Congress. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Hopkinson, M., P. Close, D. Hillson, and E. Ward. 2008. Prioritizing project risks: A short guide to useful technique. Buckinghamshire, UK: APM.
Ibbs, C. W., C. K. Wong, and Y. H. Kwak. 2001. “Project change management system.” J. Manage. Eng. 17 (3): 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2001)17:3(159).
Law, A. M. 2007. Simulation modeling and analysis. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Leedy, P. D., and J. E. Ormrod. 2001. Practical research planning and design. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Leitold, D., A. Vathy-Fogarassy, and J. Abonyi. 2017. “Controllability and observability in complex networks—The effect of connection types.” Sci. Rep. 7 (1): 151. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00160-5.
Liu, J., A. Shahi, C. T. Haas, P. Goodrum, and C. H. Caldas. 2014. “Validation methodologies and their impact in construction productivity research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (10): 04014046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000882.
Lowe, D. 2013. Commercial management: Theory and practice. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
Lucko, G., and E. M. Rojas. 2010. “Research validation: Challenges and opportunities in the construction domain.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (1): 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000025.
Muriana, C., and G. Vizzini. 2017. “Project risk management: A deterministic quantitative technique for assessment and mitigation.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (3): 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.010.
Nikander, I. O., and E. Eloranta. 2001. “Project management by early warnings.” Int. J. Project Manage. 19 (7): 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00021-1.
Ninader, I. O. 2002. “Early warnings: A phenomenon in project management.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Management, Helsinki Univ. of Technology.
PMI (Project Management Institute). 2009. Practice standard for project risk management. Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
PMI (Project Management Institute). 2017. A guide to the project management body of knowledge. 6th ed. Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
Poh, Y. P., and J. H. M. Tah. 2006. “Integrated duration–cost influence network for modeling risk impacts on construction tasks.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 24 (8): 861–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600658891.
Sun, M., and X. Meng. 2009. “Taxonomy for change causes and effect in construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 27 (6): 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.005.
Tah, J. H. M., and V. Carr. 2000. “A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 18 (4): 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190050024905.
Taroun, A. 2014. “Towards a better modeling and assessment of construction risk: Insights from a literature review.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (1): 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.004.
Valitov, S. M., and A. Sirazetdinova. 2014. “Project risks’ management model on an industrial enterprise.” Asian Social Sci. 10 (21): 242. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n21p242.
Williams, T. 1996. “The two-dimensionality of project risk.” Int. J. Project Manage. 14 (3): 185–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(96)00030-0.
Williams, T., O. J. Klakegg, D. H. T. Walker, B. Andersen, and O. M. Magnussen. 2012. “Identifying and acting on early warning signs in complex projects.” Project Manage. J. 43 (2): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21259.
Wirba, E. N., J. H. M. Tah, and R. Howes. 1996. “Risk interdependencies and natural language computations.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 3 (4): 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021034.
Wu, H. H., H. K. Chen, and J. I. Shieh. 2010. “Evaluating performance criteria of employment service outreach program personnel by DEMATEL method.” Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (7): 5219–5223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.068.
Xia, N., R. Zhong, C. Wu, X. Wang, and S. Wang. 2017. “Assessment of stakeholder-related risks in construction projects: Integrated analysis of risk attributes and stakeholder influences.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (8): 04017030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001322.
Yang, Y. O., H. M. Shieh, and G. H. Tzeng. 2013. “AVIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk assessment.” Inf. Sci. 232: 482–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.09.012.
Youssef, N. F., and W. A. Hyman. 2010. “Risk analysis: Beyond probability and severity.” Med. Device Diagn. Ind. 32 (8). in press.
Zeng, J., M. An, and N. J. Smith. 2007. “Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (6): 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.006.
Zhang, Y. 2016. “Selecting risk response strategies considering project risk interdependence.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (5): 819–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.001.
Zhang, Y., and Z. P. Fan. 2014. “An optimization method for selecting project risk response strategies.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (3): 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.06.006.
Zhou, H. B., and H. Zhang. 2010. “Dynamic risk management system for large project construction in China.” In Proc., GeoFlorida 2010. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 11November 2018

History

Received: Feb 10, 2018
Accepted: May 23, 2018
Published online: Aug 28, 2018
Published in print: Nov 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jan 28, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammad Hadi Charkhakan [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Tehran, 16 Azar Ave., P.O. Box 11155-4563, Tehran, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Univ. of Tehran, 16 Azar Ave., P.O. Box 11155-4563, Tehran, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-4920. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share