Workflow Process Model for Flash Track Projects
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 6
Abstract
Prior studies explored and identified the interrelationships of various flash track practices and concepts. This research formalizes a reengineered workflow process for successful flash tracking, known as cPEpC (little c stands for committed and collaborative engagement of downstream stakeholders at the onset of the project, big P stands for procurement of strategic and long lead items, E stands for engineering, little p stands for procurement of balanced items, and big C stands for construction). The cPEpC model is centered around the notion of the importance of building a fully integrated team by engaging key specialty contractors and vendors early on during the conceptual and detailed scoping phases. cPEpC formalizes the committed involvement of both contractors and specialty contractors as well as facilities operators and managers early in the project. In essence, it enables a construction-driven and operation and maintenance (O&M)–driven design philosophy or method of directing the design development process by injecting into it, at the outset, substantial knowledge and experience about means and methods of construction and considerations for O&M. cPEpC requires a heightened degree of concurrency among procurement, design, and construction, while maintaining safety, quality, and the risk tolerance that is needed to manage the volatility inherent in flash track projects. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by formalizing the cPEpC workflow process and by providing empirical evidence of its implementation in a first-to-market flash track project in the food and consumer products industry.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the published paper. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the Construction Industry Institute. The opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of CII. CII funding is greatly appreciated. We would like to acknowledge the wealth of knowledge received by the following individuals from CII member companies who collaborated with the authors over 2 years: Robert B. Austin, AECOM; Bob Kohlburn, MC Industrial; Cleve Whitener, Lauren Engineers and Constructors; Dale Sullivan, S&B Engineers and Constructors; Don Cahill, TVA; Marty Gamble, Alstom; Jesse Gyöngyös, ExxonMobil; John Strickland, CH2M Hill; Keith Critzer, ExxonMobil; Larry Garrett, Phillips 66; Mike Giambra, Matrix Service Company; Rob Rainbolt, Burns and McDonnell; Ron Reynolds, Yates Construction; Travis Oates, ATC; and Victor Galotti, Georgia Pacific.
References
Austin, R., P. Pishdad-Bozorgi, and J. M. de la Garza. 2016. Successful delivery of flash track projects. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
Austin, R. B., P. Pishdad-Bozorgi, and J. M. de la Garza. 2015. “Identifying and prioritizing best practices to achieve flash track projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): ..
Ballard, G., S. K. Cho, Y. W. Kim, and R. Azari. 2012. Starting from scratch: A new project delivery paradigm. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
DeHaven, T. (2009). “Design and construction of St. Anthony Falls Bridge (I-35).” In Proc., Post-Tensioning Institute Technical Conf., 1–55. Farmington Hills, MI: Post-Tensioning Institute
de la Garza, J. M., P. Pishdad-Bozorgi, and R. Austin. 2015a. Flash track readiness toolkit, implementation resource. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
de la Garza, J. M., P. Pishdad-Bozorgi, C. Whitener, and R. Austin. 2015b. Successful delivery of flash track projects, research summary. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
Lee, L., K. So, and C. Tang. 2000. “The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain.” Manage. Sci. 46 (5): 626–643.
Ozkan, F. G., C. Gaimon, and S. Kavadias. 2015.” Dynamic knowledge transfer and knowledge development for product and process design teams.” Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 17 (2): 177–190.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., R. Austin, and J. M. de la Garza. 2016a. “Network analysis of flash track practices.” J. Manage. Eng., 33 (1): ..
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., J. M. de la Garza, and R. Austin. 2016b. “Readiness assessment for flash tracking.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 142 (12): ..
Rahmani, M., G. Roels, and U. S. Karmarkar. 2017. “Collaborative work dynamics in projects with co-production.” Prod. Oper. Manage. 26 (4): 686–703.
Songer, A. D., and J. Diekmann. 2000. Re-engineering the EPC process. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
Vorster, M. C., S. A. Magrongan, and B. W. McNeil. 1998. PEpC: A breakthrough project delivery system that improves performance by reforming owner, contractor, supplier relationships. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 18, 2017
Accepted: Dec 13, 2017
Published online: Mar 29, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Aug 29, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.