Technical Notes
Mar 29, 2018

Workflow Process Model for Flash Track Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 6

Abstract

Prior studies explored and identified the interrelationships of various flash track practices and concepts. This research formalizes a reengineered workflow process for successful flash tracking, known as cPEpC (little c stands for committed and collaborative engagement of downstream stakeholders at the onset of the project, big P stands for procurement of strategic and long lead items, E stands for engineering, little p stands for procurement of balanced items, and big C stands for construction). The cPEpC model is centered around the notion of the importance of building a fully integrated team by engaging key specialty contractors and vendors early on during the conceptual and detailed scoping phases. cPEpC formalizes the committed involvement of both contractors and specialty contractors as well as facilities operators and managers early in the project. In essence, it enables a construction-driven and operation and maintenance (O&M)–driven design philosophy or method of directing the design development process by injecting into it, at the outset, substantial knowledge and experience about means and methods of construction and considerations for O&M. cPEpC requires a heightened degree of concurrency among procurement, design, and construction, while maintaining safety, quality, and the risk tolerance that is needed to manage the volatility inherent in flash track projects. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by formalizing the cPEpC workflow process and by providing empirical evidence of its implementation in a first-to-market flash track project in the food and consumer products industry.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during the study are included in the published paper. Information about the Journal’s data sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Construction Industry Institute. The opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of CII. CII funding is greatly appreciated. We would like to acknowledge the wealth of knowledge received by the following individuals from CII member companies who collaborated with the authors over 2 years: Robert B. Austin, AECOM; Bob Kohlburn, MC Industrial; Cleve Whitener, Lauren Engineers and Constructors; Dale Sullivan, S&B Engineers and Constructors; Don Cahill, TVA; Marty Gamble, Alstom; Jesse Gyöngyös, ExxonMobil; John Strickland, CH2M Hill; Keith Critzer, ExxonMobil; Larry Garrett, Phillips 66; Mike Giambra, Matrix Service Company; Rob Rainbolt, Burns and McDonnell; Ron Reynolds, Yates Construction; Travis Oates, ATC; and Victor Galotti, Georgia Pacific.

References

Austin, R., P. Pishdad-Bozorgi, and J. M. de la Garza. 2016. Successful delivery of flash track projects. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
Austin, R. B., P. Pishdad-Bozorgi, and J. M. de la Garza. 2015. “Identifying and prioritizing best practices to achieve flash track projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): ..
Ballard, G., S. K. Cho, Y. W. Kim, and R. Azari. 2012. Starting from scratch: A new project delivery paradigm. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
DeHaven, T. (2009). “Design and construction of St. Anthony Falls Bridge (I-35).” In Proc., Post-Tensioning Institute Technical Conf., 1–55. Farmington Hills, MI: Post-Tensioning Institute
de la Garza, J. M., P. Pishdad-Bozorgi, and R. Austin. 2015a. Flash track readiness toolkit, implementation resource. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
de la Garza, J. M., P. Pishdad-Bozorgi, C. Whitener, and R. Austin. 2015b. Successful delivery of flash track projects, research summary. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
Lee, L., K. So, and C. Tang. 2000. “The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain.” Manage. Sci. 46 (5): 626–643.
Ozkan, F. G., C. Gaimon, and S. Kavadias. 2015.” Dynamic knowledge transfer and knowledge development for product and process design teams.” Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage. 17 (2): 177–190.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., R. Austin, and J. M. de la Garza. 2016a. “Network analysis of flash track practices.” J. Manage. Eng., 33 (1): ..
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., J. M. de la Garza, and R. Austin. 2016b. “Readiness assessment for flash tracking.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 142 (12): ..
Rahmani, M., G. Roels, and U. S. Karmarkar. 2017. “Collaborative work dynamics in projects with co-production.” Prod. Oper. Manage. 26 (4): 686–703.
Songer, A. D., and J. Diekmann. 2000. Re-engineering the EPC process. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.
Vorster, M. C., S. A. Magrongan, and B. W. McNeil. 1998. PEpC: A breakthrough project delivery system that improves performance by reforming owner, contractor, supplier relationships. Austin, TX: Construction Industry Institute.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144Issue 6June 2018

History

Received: May 18, 2017
Accepted: Dec 13, 2017
Published online: Mar 29, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Aug 29, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jesús M. de la Garza, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Vecellio Professor, Construction Engineering and Management, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Virginia Tech, 750 Drillfield Dr., Blacksburg, VA 24060 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Pardis Pishdad-Bozorgi, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Building Construction, Georgia Institute of Technology, 280 Ferst Dr., Atlanta, GA 30332. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share