Technical Notes
Jul 18, 2016

New Approach to Estimating the Standard Deviations of Lognormal Cost Variables in the Monte Carlo Analysis of Construction Risks

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 143, Issue 1

Abstract

If soundly conducted, risk assessment could yield considerable savings for project investors. Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) has been widely embraced by risk management guides as an instrumental tool for this purpose. This research aims to develop a new method to improve the rigor of MCS by establishing the link between parameter estimation and assessment of individual risk sources. The method is validated by virtue of its predictive power for the likelihood of a project being successful in securing investors. Eight Taiwanese sewerage build-operate-transfer projects are investigated. Compared with the discounted cash flow approach, this new method can provide a more accurate prediction using the expert’s assessment as input of financial impact and occurrence likelihood of individual risks. This finding furnishes solid empirical evidence for the value MCS might add to project appraisal.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aven, T. (2008). Risk analysis: Assessing uncertainties beyond expected values and probabilities, Wiley, NJ.
Binkowitz, B. S., and Wartenberg, D. (2001). “Disparity in quantitative risk assessment: A review of input distributions.” Risk Anal., 21(1), 75–90.
Burmaster, D. E., and Hull, D. A. (1997). “Using lognormal distributions and lognormal probability plots in probabilistic risk assessments.” Human Ecol. Risk Assess., 3(2), 235–255.
Chaloner, K. (1996). “Elicitation of prior distributions.” Case studies in Bayesian biostatistics, D. Berry and D. Stangl, eds., Dekker, New York, 141–156.
Chang, C. (2015). “Risk-bearing capacity as a new dimension to the analysis of project governance.” Int. J. Project Manage., 33(6), 1195–1205.
Chau, K. (1995). “Monte Carlo simulation of construction costs using subjective data.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 13(5), 369–383.
Chou, J.-S. (2011). “Cost simulation in an item-based project involving construction engineering and management.” Int. J. Project Manage., 29(6), 706–717.
Choudhry, R. M., Aslam, M. A., Hinze, J. W., and Arain, F. M. (2014). “Cost and schedule risk analysis of bridge construction in Pakistan: Establishing risk guidelines.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04014020.
Dailami, M., Lipkovich, I., and Van Dyck, J. (1999). “INFRISK: A computer simulation approach to risk management in infrastructure project finance transactions.” World Bank, Washington, DC.
Flanagan, R., and Norman, G. (1993). Risk management and construction, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, U.K.
Green, K. C. (2002). “Forecasting decisions in conflict situations: A comparison of game theory, role-playing, and unaided judgement.” Int. J. Forecasting, 18(3), 321–344.
HM Treasury. (2007). “The green book—Appraisal and evaluation in central government.” The Stationery Office, London.
Infrastructure Risk Group. (2013). “Managing cost risk & uncertainty in infrastructure projects.” Institute of Risk Management, London.
Kadane, J., and Wolfson, L. J. (1998). “Experiences in elicitation.” J. R. Stat. Soc.: Series D, 47(1), 3–19.
Korn, R., Korn, E., and Kroisandt, G. (2010). Monte Carlo methods and models in economics and finance, CRC Press, London.
Kwak, Y. H., and Ingall, L. (2007). “Exploring Monte Carlo simulation applications for project management.” Risk Manage., 9(1), 44–57.
Lee, C. H., Yu, Y. H., and Liu, H. L. (2009). “Private participation mechanisms of sewerage BOT project in Taiwan.” J. Environ. Eng. Manage., 19(6), 371–378.
Mishra, S., Khasnabis, S., and Dhingra, S. L. (2012). “A simulation approach for estimating value at risk in transportation infrastructure investment decisions.” Res. Transp. Econ., 38(1), 128–138.
Pet-Armacost, J. J., Sepulveda, J., and Sakude, M. (1999). “Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of unknown parameters in hazardous materials transportation risk assessment.” Risk Anal., 19(6), 1173–1184.
Project Management Institute. (2008). “A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK guide.” Newtown Square, PA.
Ranasinghe, M. (1999). “Private sector participation in infrastructure projects: A methodology to analyse viability of BOT.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 17(5), 613–623.
RICS (Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors). (2012a). “NRM 1—Order of cost estimating and cost planning for capital building works.” London.
RICS (Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors). (2012b). “NRM 2—Detailed measurement for building works.” London.
Rodger, C., and Petch, J. (1999). Uncertainty & risk analysis, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, London.
Roseberry, A. M., and Burmaster, D. E. (1992). “Lognormal distributions for water intake by children and adults.” Risk Anal., 12(1), 99–104.
Seiler, F. A., and Alvarez, J. L. (1996). “On the selection of distributions for stochastic variables.” Risk Anal., 16(1), 5–18.
Simon, H. A. (2001). The science of the artificial, 3rd Ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Smith, A. E., Ryan, P. B., and Evans, J. S. (1992). “The effect of neglecting correlations when propagating uncertainty and estimating the population distribution of risk.” Risk Anal., 12(4), 467–474.
Smith, N. J., Merna, T., and Jobling, P. (2006). Managing risk in construction projects, Blackwell, Oxford, England.
Sonmez, R. (2004). “Selection of a probability distribution function for construction cost estimation.” 20th Annual ARCOM Conf., F. Khosrowshahi, ed., Vol. 1, Heriot Watt Univ., Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 125–128.
Spooner, J. E. (1974). “Probabilistic estimating.” J. Constr. Div., 100(1), 65–77.
Touran, A., and Wiser, E. P. (1992). “Monte Carlo technique with correlated random variables.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 258–272.
UNEP (United Nations Energy Program). (2007). “Assessment of financial risk management instruments for renewable energy projects.” New York.
United Nations Environment Program. (2007). “Assessment of financial risk management instruments for renewable energy projects.” Washington, DC.
Wall, D. M. (1997). “Distributions and correlations in Monte Carlo simulation.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 15(3), 241–258.
Wang, F., Machemehl, R. B., and Popova, E. (2010). “Toward Monte Carlo simulation-based mechanistic-empirical prediction of asphalt pavement performance.” J. Transp. Eng., 678–688.
Wang, M. T., and Chou, H. Y. (2003). “Risk allocation and risk handling of highway projects in Taiwan.” J. Manage. Eng., 60–68.
Wing Chau, K. (1995). “The validity of the triangular distribution assumption in Monte Carlo simulation of construction costs: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 13(1), 15–21.
Yang, I.-T. (2005). “Simulation-based estimation for correlated cost elements.” Int. J. Project Manage., 23(4), 275–282.
Ye, S., and Tiong, R. L. K. (2000). “NPV-at-risk method in infrastructure project investment evaluation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 227–233.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 143Issue 1January 2017

History

Received: Oct 17, 2014
Accepted: Jun 1, 2016
Published online: Jul 18, 2016
Discussion open until: Dec 18, 2016
Published in print: Jan 1, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chen-Yu Chang [email protected]
Lecturer, Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, Univ. College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, U.K. (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Master Student, Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, Univ. College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, U.K. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share