Case Studies
Apr 19, 2016

Construction Cost and Duration Uncertainty Model: Application to High-Speed Rail Line Project

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142, Issue 10

Abstract

Transportation construction projects are often plagued by cost overruns and delays. Applying contingencies and estimating risks at the project level often do not capture the multiple uncertainties in the construction process of large transportation projects. Thus, there is a need for innovative approaches and tools to avoid large construction cost and duration overruns. To counteract such underestimations, a construction model and an uncertainty model are developed. In the construction model, the construction of the four main types of structures in rail lines (tunnels, viaducts, cuts, and embankments) is modeled bottom-up from the single activity to the entire rail line. In the uncertainty model, three sources of uncertainty (variability in the construction process, correlations between the costs of repeated activities, and disruptive events) are modeled jointly at the level of the single activity. In a Monte Carlo simulation environment, these uncertainties are propagated to the total construction cost and duration through the combination of the individual activity costs and durations. The construction and uncertainty models are incorporated in the decision aids for tunneling (DAT), which have been extended beyond tunneling to consider these different structures and uncertainty types. All this was applied in the Portuguese high-speed rail project, in which historical data and expert estimations were used to model the cost and duration uncertainty. This application allowed validation of the model and then illustration of a variety of effects: the three sources of uncertainty produce different cost and duration impacts depending on the type of structure, suggesting structure-specific mitigation measures. Most importantly, their cumulative impact causes significant increases in construction cost and duration of the modeled rail line compared with the deterministic estimates: specifically, 58% in the construction cost of tunnels, and 94% in the construction duration of cuts and embankments. The proposed construction and uncertainty models contribute and advance the body of knowledge: For the first time, variability, correlations, and disruptive events are quantitatively modeled in one simulation environment, and the impact of these uncertainty sources can be assessed jointly and compared. The proposed models also significantly contribute to practice by providing transportation agencies with a modeling tool to tackle cost and duration uncertainty in the construction of rail lines and other linear or networked infrastructure projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge that the input data were made available by Rede Ferroviária de Alta Velocidade (RAVE) and Gabinete de Estructuras e Geotecnia (GEG). The authors would like to acknowledge Professor Louis Sousa for his support in accessing information and connections related to the high-speed rail project in Portugal.

References

Anderson, S. D., Molenaar, K. R., and Schexnayder, C. J. (2007). “Guidance for cost estimation and management for highway projects during planning, programming, and preconstruction.”, Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Back, W. E., Boles, W. W., and Fry, G. T. (2000). “Defining triangular probability distributions from historical cost data.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 29–37.
Bertsekas, D. P., and Tsitsiklis, J. N. (2002). Introduction to probability, Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA.
Caltrans. (2007). Project risk management handbook, California, Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.
Cario, M. C., and Nelson, B. L. (1997). “Modeling and generating random vectors with arbitrary marginal distributions and correlation matrix.”, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL.
Chang, D. Y. M. (1986). “RESQUE: A resource based simulation system for construction process planning.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Chau, K. W. (1995). “The validity of the triangular distribution assumption in Monte Carlo simulation of construction costs: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 13(1), 15–21.
Dikmen, I., Talat Birgonul, M., and Han, S. (2007). “Using fuzzy risk assessment to rate cost overrun risk in international construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage., 25(5), 494–505.
Dillon, R. L., and Paté-Cornell, M. E. (2001). “APRAM: An advanced programmatic risk analysis method.” Int. J. Technol. Policy Manage., 1(1), 47–55.
Einstein, H. (2001). “The decision aids for tunneling (DAT)—A brief review.” Korean J. Tunneling Technol., 3(3), 37–49.
Einstein, H. (2004). “The decision aids for tunneling: Update.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1892, 199–207.
Feng, C., Liu, L., and Burns, S. (1997). “Using genetic algorithms to solve construction time-cost trade-off problems.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 184–189.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). “From Nobel Prize to project management: Getting risks right.” Project Manage. J., 37(3), 5.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2007). “Policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects: Problems, causes, cures.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des., 34(4), 578–597.
Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. S., and Buhl, S. (2002). “Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie?” J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 68(3), 279–295.
FTA (Federal Transit Administration). (2004). “Risk assessment methodologies and procedures.”, Washington, DC.
Haas, C., and Einstein, H. H. (2002). “Updating the decision aids for tunneling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 40–48.
Hajjar, D., and AbouRizk, S. (2002). “Unified modeling methodology for construction simulation”. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 174–185.
Halpin, D., and Woodhead, R. (1976). Design and construction of process operations, Wiley, New York.
Halpin, D. W. (1990). MicroCYCLONE user’s manual, Div. of Construction Engineering and Management, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN.
Ioannou, P. G. (1989). UM-CYCLONE user’s guide, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kim, G.-H., An, S.-H., and Kang, K.-I. (2004). “Comparison of construction cost estimating models based on regression analysis, neural networks, and case-based reasoning.” Build. Environ., 39(10), 1235–1242.
Li, H., and Love, P. E. (1997). “Using improved genetic algorithms to facilitate time-cost optimization.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 233–237.
Lovallo, D., and Kahneman, D. (2003). “Delusions of success.” Harv. Bus. Rev., 81(7), 56–63.
Martinez, J. C. (1996). “STROBOSCOPE: State and resource based simulation of construction processes.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
McCaffer, R., McCaffrey, M. J., and Thorpe, A. (1984). “Predicting the tender price of buildings in the early design stage: Method and validation.” J. Oper. Res. Soc., 35(5), 415–424.
Min, S. Y. (2008). “Development of the resource model for the decision aids for tunneling (DAT).” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Moavenzadeh, F., Becker, M., and Parody, T. E. (1972). “The highway cost model.” Dept. of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Moavenzadeh, F., Markow, M. J., Wyatt, R. D., and Minott, C. H. (1974). “Tunnel cost model.” 2nd Proc., Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conf., Vol. 2, American Institute of Mining Engineers (AIME), Englewood, CO, 1721–1739.
Molenaar, K. R. (2005). “Programmatic cost risk analysis for highway megaprojects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 343–353.
Moret, Y. (2011). “Modeling cost and time uncertainty in rail line construction.” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Moret, Y., and Einstein, H. H. (2012a). “Experience in expert estimation of probabilities and correlations for rail line construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1103–1106.
Moret, Y., and Einstein, H. H. (2012b). “Modeling correlations in rail line construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1075–1084.
Newton, S. (1991). “An agenda for cost modelling research.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 9(2), 97–112.
Odeh, A. M. (1992). “CIPROS: Knowledge-based construction integrated project and process planning simulation system.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ökmen, Ö., and Öztas, A. (2008). “Construction project network evaluation with correlated schedule risk analysis model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 49–63.
Oloufa, A. A., and Ikeda, M. (1997). “Library-based simulation modeling in construction.” Computing in Civil Engineering: Proc., Second Congress, ASCE, New York, 198–205.
Paek, J. H., Lee, Y. W., and Ock, J. H. (1993). “Pricing construction risk: Fuzzy set application.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 743–756.
Paulson, B. C., Jr. (1978). “Interactive graphic for simulating construction operations.” J. Constr. Div., 104(1), 69–76.
Salvucci, F. P. (2003). “The ‘Big Dig’ of Boston, Massachusetts: Lessons to learn.” (Re)Claiming the Underground Space: Proc., ITA World Tunnelling Congress, J. Saveur, ed., Vol. 1, Balkema, Lisse, Netherlands.
Shi, J., and AbouRizk, S. M. (1997). “Resource-based modeling for construction simulation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 26–33.
Sousa, R. L. (2010). “Risk analysis for tunneling projects.” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Tah, J. H. M., and Carr, V. (2000). “A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic.” J. Constr. Manage. Econ., 18(4), 491–500.
Touran, A. (1993). “Probabilistic cost estimating with subjective correlations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 58–71.
Touran, A., and Wiser, E. P. (1992). “Monte Carlo technique with correlated random variables.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 258–272.
Trost, S. M., and Oberlender, G. D. (2003). “Predicting accuracy of early cost estimates using factor analysis and multivariate regression.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 198–204.
U.S. Department of the Navy. (1958). “PERT, program evaluation research task.”, Special Projects Office, Bureau of Ordnance, Washington, DC.
WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). (2005). “A policy for cost risk assessment.”, Olympia, WA.
WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation). (2008). “WSDOT guidelines for CRA-CEVP workshops.”, Olympia, WA.
Yeh, I. C. (1998). “Quantity estimating of building with logarithm-neuron networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 374–380.
Zheng, D., Ng, S., and Kumaraswamy, M. (2004). “Applying a genetic algorithm-based multiobjective approach for time-cost optimization.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 168–176.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142Issue 10October 2016

History

Received: Sep 28, 2015
Accepted: Feb 2, 2016
Published online: Apr 19, 2016
Discussion open until: Sep 19, 2016
Published in print: Oct 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yvonne Moret [email protected]
Former Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Herbert H. Einstein, F.ASCE
Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share