Influence of the Format of Engineering Information and Spatial Cognition on Craft-Worker Performance
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142, Issue 9
Abstract
A series of field trials with pipefitters in North America was conducted to explore how their spatial cognition influenced their performance on a scale model assembly task. Participants were provided one of three information formats, traditional, two-dimensional (2D) isometric drawings, 2D isometric drawings supplemented with a 2D visual rendering of a three-dimensional (3D) image of the assembly, and 2D isometric drawings supplemented with a 3D physical model of the assembly. Card rotation and cube comparison tests were administered to measure spatial cognition. This paper’s primary contribution centers around the discovery that individual spatial cognition significantly influenced the pipefitter’s performance, but the format of information can neutralize the effect. Both the information format and spatial cognition significantly influenced performance. When only 2D information was provided, participants with relatively low spatial cognition performed significantly worse than participants with relatively higher spatial cognition. When the 2D isometric drawings were supplemented with 3D information, participants with lower spatial cognition were able to complete the model assembly as efficiently and effectively as participants with higher spatial cognition.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Financial and in-kind support for these research efforts were provided through multiple sources. A Construction Industry Institute (CII) grant under CII RT-327 Innovative Delivery Methods of Information to the Crafts made the field trials and data collection possible. CII’s financial and in-kind support of its member companies is gratefully acknowledged. The research also acknowledges the financial support from the Saudi Arabia Ministry of Higher Education through Taibah University. Finally, the research was made possible through financial support through the Nicholas R. Petry Endowment in the Construction, Engineering, and Management program at the University of Colorado Boulder. Any opinions, findings, and recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the supporting agencies.
References
Albattah, M., Goodrum, P., and Taylor, T. (2015). “The influence of demographics on construction workforce shortages in the U.S. and Canada.” Int. Construction Specialty Conf., Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Baddeley, A. (2012). “Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies.” Ann. Rev. Psychol., 63(1), 1–29.
Baldwin, C. L. (2009). “Individual differences in navigational strategy: Implications for display design.” Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci., 10(5), 443–458.
Bowden, S., Dorr, A., Thorpe, A., and Anumba, C. (2006). “Mobile ICT support for construction process improvement.” Autom. Constr., 15(5), 664–676.
Brennan, K., Kelly, D., and Arguello, J. (2014). “The effect of cognitive abilities on information search for tasks of varying levels of complexity.” Proc., 5th Information Interaction in Context Symp., ACM, New York, 165–174.
Dadi, G. B., Goodrum, P. M., Taylor, T. R., and Carswell, C. M. (2014a). “Cognitive workload demands using 2D and 3D spatial engineering information formats.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04014001.
Dadi, G. B., Goodrum, P. M., Taylor, T. R., and Maloney, W. F. (2014b). “Effectiveness of communication of spatial engineering information through 3D CAD and 3D printed models.” Visualization Eng., 2(1), 1–12.
Dadi, G. B., Taylor, T. R., Goodrum, P. M., and Maloney, W. F. (2014c). “Performance of 3D computers and 3D printed models as a fundamental means for spatial engineering information visualization.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 41(10), 869–877.
Dai, J., Goodrum, P. M., and Maloney, W. F. (2009a). “Construction craft worker’ perceptions of the factors affecting their productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 217–226.
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., and Dermen, D. (1976). Maunal for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., and Dermen, D. (1976). “Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests.” Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
Emmitt, S., and Gorse, C. (2003). Construction communication, Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.
Feuerstack, S., Lüdtke, A., and Osterloh, J. P. (2015). “A tool for easing the cognitive analysis of design prototypes of aircraft cockpit instruments: The human efficiency evaluator.” Proc., European Conf. on Cognitive Ergonomics 2015, ACM, New York, 22.
Gonzalez, C. (2005). “Task workload and cognitive abilities in dynamic decision making.” Hum. Factors: J. Human Factors Ergon. Soc., 47(1), 92–101.
Goodrum, P., Haas, C., Caldas, C., Shan, Y., Kim, J., and Liu, Y. (2013). “The productivity handbook.” Construction Industry Institute, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Goodrum, P. M., and Miller, J. M. (2015). “Innovative delivery methods of information to the crafts.” Construction Industry Institute, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Kamat, V. R., Martinez, J. C., Fischer, M., Golparvar-Fard, M., Peña-Mora, F., and Savarese, S. (2010). “Research in visualization techniques for field construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 853–862.
Liberda, M., Ruwanpura, J., and Jergeas, G. (2003). “Construction productivity improvement: A study of human, management and external issues.” Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–8.
Lohman, D. F. (1979). “Spatial ability: A review and reanalysis of the correlational literature.”, U.S. Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA.
Lord, S., and Marsh, G. (1975). “Age difference in the speed of a spatial cognitive process.” J. Gerontol., 30(6), 674–678.
Moffat, S., Zonderman, A., and Resnick, S. (2001). “Age differences in spatial memory in a virtual environment navigation task.” Neurobiol. Aging, 22(5), 787–796.
Neumann, U., and Majoros, A. (1998). “Cognitive, performance, and systems issues for augmented reality applications in manufacturing and maintenance.” Proc., Virtual Reality Annual Int. Symp., IEEE, Washington, DC, 4–11.
O’Brien, W. J., Hurley, M. J., Mondragon Solis, F. A., and Nguyen, T. (2011). “Cognitive task analysis of superintendent’s work: A case study and critique of supporting information technologies.” J. Inform. Technol. Constr., 16(2011), 529–566.
O’Connor, J. T. (1985). “Impacts of constructability improvement.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 404–410.
Ogelsby, C. H., Parker, H. W., and Howell, G. A. (1989). Productivity improvement in construction, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Rieber, L. P. (1995). “A historical review of visualization in human cognition.” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., 43(1), 45–56.
Sharps, M., Price, J., and Williams, J. (1994). “Spatial cognition and gender: Instructional and stimulus influences on mental image rotation performance.” Psychol. Women Q., 18(3), 413–425.
Stanney, K. M., and Salvendy, G. (1995). “Information visualization; assisting low spatial individuals with information access tasks through the use of visual mediators.” Ergonomics, 38(6), 1184–1198.
Sweany, J. B. (2014). “Cognitive demand of engineering information.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO.
Taylor, H., Thomas, A., Artuso, C., and Eastman, C. (2014). “Effects of global and local processing on visuospatial working memory.” Spatial Cognition IX: Int. Conf., Bremen, Springer, Switzerland, 14–75.
Thomas, R., and Sakarcan, A. S. (1994). “Forecasting labor productivity using factor model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 228–239.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 13, 2015
Accepted: Jan 22, 2016
Published online: Mar 24, 2016
Discussion open until: Aug 24, 2016
Published in print: Sep 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.