Case Studies
Dec 29, 2015

Social Sustainability in the Lifecycle of Chilean Public Infrastructure

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142, Issue 5

Abstract

To enhance concern for the social aspects of sustainability and to delineate the criteria to be considered at each stage of the lifecycle of an infrastructure, this paper aims to determine the relevance of a set of criteria that evaluate social sustainability throughout the lifecycle of a public civil infrastructure. This research presents the results of a case study applying the Delphi method to 24 Chilean experts consulted in a series of three rounds. In addition, binomial statistical tests and Kendall’s coefficient were used to show the convergence of the experts. Thus, it was identified that of 36 initial criteria assessed at each stage of the lifecycle, the consideration of 20 is required at the design stage, 29 at the construction stage, 33 during operation, and 27 at demolition. The most relevant criteria, per lifecycle stage, were Stakeholder Participation (design and demolition stages), External Local Population (design stage), Internal Human Resources (construction and demolition stages), Macro-Social Action of Socioenvironmental Activities (construction stage), and Macro-Social Action of Socioeconomic Activities (operation stage).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the European Commission under the Erasmus Mundus Lindo Program (EMA-2-2012-2658) and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness along with FEDER funding (Project BIA2014-56574-R). The authors are also very grateful to the participants in the Delphi study and to professors Joaquín Catalá, Jaime Jiménez, and José V. Martí-Albiñana for participating in the focus group.

References

Alarcón, L., Ashley, D., de Hanily, A., Molenaar, K., and Ungo, R. (2011). “Risk planning and management for the Panama Canal expansion program.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 762–771.
Alarcón, L. F., Pavez, I., Bascuñan, C., and Diethelm, S. (2005). “Organizational diagnostics of Chilean construction companies.” Proc., 4th SIBRAGEC Brazilian Symp. on Economy and Management of the Construction, Associaçao Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído (ANTAC), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Alshubbak, A., Pellicer, E., Catalá, J., and Teixeira, J. C. (2015). “A model for identifying owner’s needs in the building lifecycle.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage., 21(8), 1–15.
Anand, S., and Sen, A. (2000). “Human development and economic sustainability.” World Dev., 28(12), 2029–2049.
Armour, A. (1990). “Integrating impact assessment in the planning process: From rhetoric to reality.” Impact Assess. Bull., 8(1–2), 1–14.
Axelsson, R., et al. (2013). “Social and cultural sustainability: Criteria, indicators, verifier variables for measurement and maps for visualization to support planning.” AMBIO, 42(2), 215–228.
Azapagic, A. (2004). “Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry.” J. Clean. Prod., 12(6), 639–662.
Bakht, M., and El-Diraby, T. (2015). “Synthesis of decision-making research in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04015027.
Boyle, C., et al. (2010). “Delivering sustainable infrastructure that supports the urban built environment.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 44(13), 4836–4840.
Brent, A. C., and Labuschagne, C. (2006). “Social indicators for sustainable project and technology lifecycle management in the process industry.” Int. J. Life-Cycle Assess., 11(1), 3–15.
Burdge, R. (1994). A community guide to social impact assessment, Social Ecology Press, Middleton, WI.
Burdge, R. (2004). A community guide to social impact assessment, 3rd Ed., Social Ecology Press, Middleton, WI.
CIB (Internacional Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction). (2002). “Agenda 21 for sustainable construction in developing countries.”, Pretoria, South Africa.
Cortés, J. M., Pellicer, E., and Catalá, J. (2012). “Integration of occupational risk prevention courses in engineering degree: Delphi study.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 31–36.
DESA (Department of Economic and Social Affairs). (2007). Indicators of sustainable development. guideline and methodologies, 3rd Ed., United Nations, New York.
DGMA (Dirección General del Medio Ambiente). (2000a). Methodological guidelines for the preparation of environmental impact studies: Large dams, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, Spain.
DGMA (Dirección General del Medio Ambiente). (2000b). Methodological guidelines for the preparation of environmental impact studies: Roads and railways, 2nd Ed., Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, Spain.
Egre, D., and Senecal, P. (2003). “Social impact assessments of large dams throughout the world: Lessons learned over two decades.” Impact Assess. Project Appraisal, 21(3), 215–224.
EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (1969). “National environmental policy act.” Washington, DC.
Fernández-Sánchez, G., and Rodríguez-López, F. (2010). “A methodology to identify sustainability indicators in construction project management–Application to infrastructure projects in Spain.” Ecol. Indic., 10(6), 1193–1201.
Finsterbusch, K. (1985). “State of the art in social impact assessment.” Environ. Behav., 17(2), 193–221.
Florez, L., Castro-Lacouture, D., and Medaglia, A. L. (2013). “Sustainable workforce scheduling in construction program management.” J. Oper. Res. Soc., 64(8), 1169–1181.
Gilchrist, A., and Allouche, E. N. (2005). “Quantification of social costs associated with construction projects: State-of-the-art review.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol., 20(1), 89–104.
Government of Chile. (2013). “Towards a public policy social responsibility for sustainable development in Chile.” Santiago, Chile.
Griffiths, K., Browne, V., Williams, V., and Elliott, P. (2011). “The changing face of engineering down under.” Eng. Sustainability, 165(3), 223–232.
GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2013). “Sustainability reporting guidelines g4: Reporting principles and standard disclosures.” Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Hallowell, M., and Gambatese, J. (2010). “Application of the Delphi method to CEM research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 99–107.
Hill, R., and Bowen, P. (1997). “Sustainable construction: Principles and a framework for attainment.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 15(3), 223–239.
Huang, B., Yang, H., Mauerhofer, V., and Guo, R. (2012). “Sustainability assessment of low carbon technologies-case study of the building sector in China.” J. Clean. Prod., 32, 244–250.
ICPGSIA (Interorganizational Committee on Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment). (1995). “Guideline and principles for social impact assessment.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 15(1), 11–43.
ICPGSIA (Interorganizational Committee on Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment). (2003). “Principles and guidelines for social impact assessment in the USA.” Impact Assess. Project Appraisal., 21(3), 231–250.
ILO (International Labour Organization). (2015). “World employment social outlook.” Geneva.
ISO (International Standardization Organization). (2010). “Guidance on social responsibility: ISO 26000.” Geneva.
Koo, D. H., and Ariaratnam, S. T. (2008). “Application of a sustainability model for assessing water main replacement options.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 563–574.
Koo, D. H., Ariaratnam, S. T., and Kavazanjian, E. (2009). “Development of a sustainability assessment model for underground infrastructure projects.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 36(5), 765–776.
Labuschagne, C., and Brent, A. C. (2008). “An industry perspective of the completeness and relevance of a social assessment framework for project and technology management in the manufacturing sector.” J. Clean. Prod., 16(3), 253–262.
Labuschagne, C., Brent, A. C., and Van Erck, R. P. G. (2005). “Assessing the sustainability performance of industries.” J. Clean. Prod., 13(4), 373–385.
Lang, D., Scholz, R. W., Binder, C. R., Wiek, A., and Stäubli, B. (2007). “Sustainability potential analysis (SPA) of landfills—A systemic approach: Theoretical considerations a systemic.” J. Clean. Prod., 15(17), 1628–1638.
Lehmann, A., Zschieschang, E., Traverso, M., Finkbeiner, M., and Schebek, L. (2013). “Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—Challenges for social lifecycle assessment (SLCA).” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 18(8), 1581–1592.
Lockie, S. F. (2009). “Coal mining and the resource community cycle: A longitudinal assessment of the social impacts of the Coppabella coal mine.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 29(5), 330–339.
Menendez, J. R. (2003). Mantenimiento Rutinario de Caminos por Microempresas, International Labour Organization, Lima, Perú (in Spanish).
Naderpajouh, N., Mahdavi, A., Hastak, M., and Aldrich, D. (2014). “Modeling social opposition to infrastructure development.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04014029.
Oñate, N., Ramos, L., and Díaz, A. (1998). “Utilización del método Delphi en la pronosticación: Una experiencia inicial.” Economía Planificada, 3(4), 9–48 (in Spanish).
Pellicer, E., Yepes, V., Teixeira, J. C., Moura, H. P., and Catala, J. (2014). Construction management, Wiley-Blackwell, Cambridge, U.K.
Rowe, G., and Wright, G. (1999). “The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis.” Int. J. Forecasting, 15(4), 353–375.
Shen, L. Y., Tam, V. W. Y., Tam, L., and Ji, Y. (2010). “Project feasibility study: The key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice.” J. Clean. Prod., 18(3), 254–259.
Siegel, S. (1983). Nonparametric statistics applied to the behavioral sciences, 2nd Ed., Trillas, México.
Singh, R.Keil, M., and Kasi, V. (2009). “Identifying and overcoming the challenges of implementing a project management office.” Eur. J. Inform. Syst., 18(5), 409–427.
Slootweg, R, Vanclay, F., and van Schooten, M. (2001). “Function evaluation as a framework for the integration of social and environmental impact assessment.” Impact Assess. Project Appraisal, 19(1), 19–28.
Sourani, A., and Sohail, M. (2015). “The Delphi method: Review and use in construction management research.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., 11(1), 54–76.
Spangenberg, J. H. (2002). “Institutional sustainability indicators: An analysis of the institutions in Agenda 21 and a draft set of indicators for monitoring their effectivity.” Sustainable Dev., 10(2), 103–115.
Torres-Machí, C., Chamorro, A., Pellicer, E., Yepes, V., and Videla, C. (2015). “Sustainable pavement management: How to integrate economic, technical and environmental aspects in decision making.” Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Torres-Machí, C., Chamorro, A., Yepes, V., and Pellicer, E. (2014). “Current models and practices of economic and environmental evaluation for sustainable network-level pavement management.” Rev. Constr., 13(2), 49–56.
Ugwu, O. O., and Haupt, T. C. (2007). “Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability—A South African construction industry perspective.” Build. Environ., 42(2), 665–680.
Ugwu, O. O., Kumaraswamy, M. M., Wong, A., and Ng, S. T. (2006a). “Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP). Part 1: Development of indicators and computational methods.” Autom. Constr., 15(2), 239–251.
Ugwu, O. O., Kumaraswamy, M. M., Wong, A., and Ng, S. T. (2006b). “Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP). Part 2: A case study in bridge design.” Autom. Constr., 15(2), 229–238.
UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development). (1992). “Agenda 21: Action plan for the next century.” Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Valdes-Vasquez, R., and Klotz, L. (2013). “Social sustainability considerations during planning and design: Framework of processes for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 80–89.
Vallance, S., Perkins, H., and Dixon, J. (2011). “What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts.” Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348.
Vanclay, F. (1999). “Social impact assessment.” Handbook of environmental impact assessment, J. Petts, ed., Vol. 1, Blackwell, Oxford, U.K., 301–326.
Vanclay, F. (2002). “Conceptualising social impacts.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 22(3), 183–211.
Vanclay, F. (2003). “International principles for social impact assessment.” Impact Assess. Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5–12.
Venegas, J. A. (2003). “Road map and principles for built environment sustainability.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 37(23), 5363–5372.
Wang, B. (2004). “A taxonomy of sustainability in highway construction.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our common future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Yepes, V., García-Segura, T., and Moreno-Jiménez, J. M. (2015). “A cognitive approach for the multi-objective optimization of RC structural problems.” Arch. Civil Mech. Eng., 15(4), 1024–1036.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142Issue 5May 2016

History

Received: Apr 29, 2015
Accepted: Oct 7, 2015
Published online: Dec 29, 2015
Published in print: May 1, 2016
Discussion open until: May 29, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Leonardo A. Sierra [email protected]
Instructor, Dpto. Ingeniería de Obras Civiles, Universidad de La Frontera, Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco, Chile. E-mail: [email protected]
Eugenio Pellicer, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Víctor Yepes [email protected]
Associate Professor, ICITECH, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share