Technical Papers
Oct 22, 2015

Party Selection for Integrated Project Delivery Based on Interorganizational Transactive Memory System

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142, Issue 3

Abstract

As a new delivery mode, integrated project delivery (IPD) relies on highly trust-based collaboration among project parties. Thus, selecting the appropriate parties is important for successful IPD. Although traditional selection methods, which are primarily based on only the lowest tender price or multiple criteria other than price, can help select parties that can complete an integrated project, they are not completely suitable for IPD when trust and collaborative relationship among the project parties are considered. To improve upon this shortcoming of established methods, a new method based on the concept of an interorganizational transactive memory system (I-TMS) is established in this paper. The I-TMS drives group members to be mutually trusting and cooperatively integrate their professional knowledge, which reflects the idea of collaboration that underlies IPD. In this study, party selection for IPD was achieved via two processes. First, this study developed an I-TMS rating scale and conducted a questionnaire-based analysis to verify its reliability and validity quantitatively. Second, this study selected an appropriate combination from seven combinations of party candidates. In addition, this study analyzed the appropriate combination using social network analysis (SNA). The results suggest that project parties with a low I-TMS degree should engage in frequent interaction to foster mutual cognition and trust and improve team collaboration for IPD.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work described in this article is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Project No. 71272146).

References

AIA (American Institute of Architects). (2007). “Integrated project delivery—A guide.” California Council, Washington, DC.
Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., and Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005). “Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective.” Inf. Manage., 42(8), 1105–1120.
Argote, L., and Ingram, P. (2000). “Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms.” Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes, 82(1), 150–169.
Ashleigh, M., and Prichard, J. (2012). “An integrative model of the role of trust in transactive memory development.” Group Organiz. Manage., 37(1), 5–35.
Associated General Contractors of America. (2010). “Integrated project delivery for public and private owners.” Arlington, VA.
Chan, A. P., Chan, D. W., Chiang, Y. H., Tang, B. S., Chan, E. H., and Ho, K. S. (2004). “Exploring critical success factors for partnering in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 188–198.
Chen, X., Li, X., Clark, J. G., and Dietrich, G. B. (2013). “Knowledge sharing in open source software project teams: A transactive memory system perspective.” Int. J. Inf. Manage., 33(3), 553–563.
Chinowsky, P. S., Diekmann, J., and O’Brien, J. (2010). “Project organizations as social networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 452–458.
Cristóbal, J. R. S. (2011). “Contractor selection using multicriteria decision-making methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 751–758.
El-Abbasy, M. S., Zayed, T., Ahmed, M., Alzraiee, H., and Abouhamad, M. (2013). “Contractor selection model for highway projects using integrated simulation and analytic network process.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 755–767.
Enyinda, C. I., Ogbuehi, A. O., and Udo, G. (2011). “A decision support model for contractor selection in a government procurement supply chain: Evidence from an emerging market.” J. Manage. Policy Pract., 12(7), 9–17.
Ghassemi, R., and Gerber, B. B. (2011). “Transitioning to integrated project delivery: Potential barriers and lessons learned.” Lean Constr. J., 2011, 32–52.
Hollingshead, A. B. (2001). “Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory.” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 81(6), 1080–1089.
Holt, G. D., Love, P. E., and Li, H. (2000). “The learning organisation: Toward a paradigm for mutually beneficial strategic construction alliances.” Int. J. Project Manage., 18(6), 415–421.
Hsu, J. S. C., Shih, S. P., Chiang, J. C., and Liu, J. Y. C. (2012). “The impact of transactive memory systems on IS development teams’ coordination, communication, and performance.” Int. J. Project Manage., 30(3), 329–340.
Jaskowski, P., Biruk, S., and Bucon, R. (2010). “Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment.” Autom. Constr., 19(2), 120–126.
Lee, J. Y., Bachrach, D. G., and Lewis, K. (2014). “Social network ties, transactive memory, and performance in groups.” Organiz. Sci., 25(3), 951–967.
Lewis, K. (2003). “Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation.” J. Appl. Psychol., 88(4), 587–604.
Lewis, K. (2004). “Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems.” Manage. Sci., 50(11), 1519–1533.
Li, Y. H., and Huang, J. W. (2013). “Exploitative and exploratory learning in transactive memory systems and project performance.” Inf. Manage., 50(6), 304–313.
Liao, J., Jimmieson, N. L., O’Brien, A. T., and Restubog, S. L. (2012). “Developing transactive memory systems theoretical contributions from a social identity perspective.” Group Organiz. Manage., 37(2), 204–240.
Ling, H., Hong, D. C., and Zhang, C. H. (2011). “Research on tacit knowledge integration: A synthesis of social ties and TMS.” Knowl. Manage. Res. Pract., 9(3), 256–262.
Lloyd-Walker, B. M., Mills, A. J., and Walker, D. H. (2014). “Enabling construction innovation: The role of a no-blame culture as a collaboration behavioural driver in project alliances.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 32(3), 229–245.
Matthews, O., and Howell, G. A. (2005). “Integrated project delivery an example of relational contracting.” Lean Constr. J., 2(1), 46–61.
Meng, X. (2012). “The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction.” Int. J. Project Manage., 30(2), 188–198.
Molenaar, K. R., Sobin, N., and Antillón, E. I. (2010). “A synthesis of best-value procurement practices for sustainable design-build projects in the public sector.” J. Green Build., 5(4), 148–157.
O’Connor, P. J., Jr. (2009). Integrated project delivery: Collaboration through new contract forms, Faegre & Benson, LLP, Minneapolis.
Palaneewaran, E., Kumaraswamy, M., and Zhang, X. Q. (2012). “Focusing on best value from a source selection perspective.” Australas. J. Constr. Econ. Build., 4(1), 21–34.
Park, J., Lee, J., Lee, H., and Truex, D. (2012). “Exploring the impact of communication effectiveness on service quality, trust and relationship commitment in IT services.” Int. J. Inf. Manage., 32(5), 459–468.
Peltokorpi, V. (2012). “Organizational transactive memory systems: Review and extension.” Eur. Psychol., 17(1), 11–20.
Peltokorpi, V., and Manka, M. L. (2008). “Antecedents and the performance outcome of transactive memory in daycare work groups.” Eur. Psychol., 13(2), 103–113.
Rulke, D. L., and Rau, D. (2000). “Investigating the encoding process of transactive memory development in group training.” Group Organiz. Manage., 25(4), 373–396.
Singh, D., and Tiong, R. L. (2005). “A fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 62–70.
Touran, A., Gransberg, D. D., Molenaar, K. R., and Ghavamifar, K. (2011). “Selection of project delivery method in transit: Drivers and objectives.” J. Manage. Eng., 21–27.
Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Watt, D. J., Kayis, B., and Willey, K. (2010). “The relative importance of tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria.” Int. J. Project Manage., 28(1), 51–60.
Wegner, D. M. (1987). “Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind.” Theories of group behavior, B. Mullen and G. R. Goethals, eds., Springer, New York, 185–208.
Wong, W. K., Cheung, S. O., Yiu, T. W., and Pang, H. Y. (2008). “A framework for trust in construction contracting.” Int. J. Project Manage., 26(8), 821–829.
Xu, W., Tang, X., Dan, H., and Liu, H. (2014). “Establishing the system of how to select the contractor in a large-scale construction project.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Management Science and Engineering Management, Springer, London, 1329–1338.
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., and Tamošaitienė, J. (2008). “Contractor selection of construction in a competitive environment.” J. Bus. Econ. Manage., 9(3), 181–187.
Zheng, Y. (2012). “Unlocking founding team prior shared experience: A transactive memory system perspective.” J. Bus. Venturing, 27(5), 577–591.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 142Issue 3March 2016

History

Received: Sep 7, 2014
Accepted: Aug 7, 2015
Published online: Oct 22, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Mar 22, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lianying Zhang, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, People’s Republic of China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Jiajia Cheng [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, People’s Republic of China. E-mail: [email protected]
Master, College of Management and Economics, Tianjin Univ., Tianjin 300072, People’s Republic of China. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share