Technical Papers
Sep 2, 2014

Case Studies of the Allocation and Reduction of Time Buffer through Use of the Last Planner System

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 141, Issue 2

Abstract

Buffers are used in construction to absorb variation caused by the inherent complexity and uncertainty present in construction projects. The case studies presented here focus on time buffer added to construction task durations. For this research, time buffer is defined as extra time added during planning to individual task durations to compensate for uncertainty and protect against workflow variation. Two case studies were conducted with one involving a mechanical contractor and the other involving a large general contractor. This research contributes to the body of knowledge by: (1) investigating the time buffer impact on project performance; (2) empirically demonstrating the effect of last planner system (LPS) on reducing time buffer and increasing percent planned complete (PPC); and (3) examining the buffer trends of different trades and activity types. The findings demonstrate LPS as an example of an effective planning strategy for construction managers in improving project performance and help them understand what drives the need for buffer in their construction schedules, allowing efforts focused on strategically addressing the most critical areas of concern and uncertainty.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Alves, T. C. L., and Tommelein, I. D. (2004). “Simulation of buffering and batching practices.” Proc., 12th Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 12), Lean Construction Institute, Arlington, VA, 277–290.
Ballard, G. (1997). “Lookahead planning: The missing link in production control.” Proc., 5th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, Griffith Univ., Gold Coast, Australia.
Ballard, G. (2000a). Phase scheduling, LCI White Paper-7, 〈www.leanconstruction.org〉, 3.
Ballard, G. (2000b). “The last planner system of production control.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.
Ballard, G. (2005). “Construction: One type of project production system.” Proc., 13th Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 13), Lean Construction Institute, Arlington, VA, 29–35.
Ballard, G., and Howell, G. (1995). “Toward construction JIT.” Proc., 1995 ARCOM Conf., Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Univ. of Reading, Berkshire, U.K.
Ballard, G., Koskela, L. J., Howell, G. A., and Tommelien, I. D. (2003). “Discussion of ‘improving labor flow reliability for better productivity as lean construction principle’.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 251–261.
Chinowski, P., Diekmann, J., and Galotti, V. (2008). “Social network model of construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 804–812.
Coble, R. J. (1994). “Bringing the construction foreman into the computer age.” Computing in Civil Engineering: Proc., 1st Congress, Washington, DC, 1446–1453.
Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organizational design, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Goldratt, E. M. (1997). Critical chain, North River Press, Great Barrington, MA.
Hanna, A. S., Peterson, P., and Lee, M. (2002). “Benchmarking productivity indicators for electrical/mechanical projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 331–337.
Hopp, W. J., and Spearman, M. L. (2008). Factory physics, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Horman, M., and Kenley, R. (1998). “Process dynamics: Identifying a strategy for the deployment of buffers in building projects.” Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl., 1(3), 221–237.
Hornby, A. S. (1974). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Howell, G. (2009). A guide to the last planner for construction foremen and supervisors, Lean Construction Institute, Arlington, VA.
Howell, G., Laufer, A., and Ballard, G. (1993). “Interaction between sub-cycles: One key to improved methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 714–728.
Howell, G. A., and Ballard, G. (1996). Managing uncertainty in the piping function, Construction Industry Institute, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Lechler, T. G., Ronen, B., and Stohr, E. A. (2005). “Critical chain: A new project management paradigm or old wine in new bottles?” Eng. Manage. J., 17(4), 45–58.
Liu, M., and Ballard, G. (2009). “Factors affecting work flow reliability–A case study.” Proc., 17th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 17), Lean Construction Institute, Arlington, VA, 657–666.
Meredith, J. (1998). “Building operations management theory through case and field research.” J. Oper. Manage., 16(4), 441–454.
Oberlender, G. D. (2000). Project management for engineering and construction, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York.
Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production, Productivity Press, Portland, OR.
Risner, R. (2010). Auditing construction contingency, Association of Healthcare Internal Auditors, Wheat Ridge, CO, 37–38.
Russell, M., Howell, G., Hsiang, M., and Liu, M. (2013). “The application of time buffers to construction project task durations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04013008.
Sakamoto, M., Horman, M. J., and Thomas, H. R. (2002). “A study of the relationship between buffers and performance in construction.” Proc., 10th Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC 10), Lean Construction Institute, Arlington, VA.
Tommelein, I. D., Riley, D. R., and Howell, G. A. (1999). “Parade game: Impact of work flow variability on trade performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 304–310.
Vrijhoef, R. (1998). “Co-makership in construction: Towards construction supply chain management.” Thesis of Graduate Studies, Delft Univ. of Technology and Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
Wambeke, B., Hsiang, S., and Liu, M. (2011). “Causes of variation in construction project task starting times and duration.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 663–677.
Wambeke, B., Liu, M., and Hsiang, S. (2012). “Using last planner and a risk assessment matrix to reduce variation in mechanical related construction tasks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 491–498.
Wambeke, B. W. (2011). “Identifying, prioritizing, and reducing variation of construction related tasks.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC.
Womack, J. P., and Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation, Simon & Schuster, New York.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 141Issue 2February 2015

History

Received: Sep 7, 2013
Accepted: May 23, 2014
Published online: Sep 2, 2014
Published in print: Feb 1, 2015
Discussion open until: Feb 2, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Marion M. Russell [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7908. E-mail: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7908 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Gregory Howell, M.ASCE [email protected]
President, Lean Construction Institute, 1400 N. 14th St., #400, Arlington, VA 22209. E-mail: [email protected]
Simon M. Hsiang [email protected]
Derr Professor, Industrial Engineering, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share