Ontology for Representing Building Users’ Activities in Space-Use Analysis
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140, Issue 8
Abstract
In spite of advances in formalizing space-use analysis (SUA) methods, which predict space utilization of buildings based on user activities and spaces, a detailed ontology that provides architects with a common vocabulary to represent their information about user activities is still lacking. The authors created an ontology that can be used in a formalized SUA method by extending combined existing theories on representing user or construction activities. This ontology allows architects to represent a user activity in a <User>, an <Action>, and two <Spatial requirement> instances. It also allows a computer to distinguish between 288 different space-use types that affect SUA and treat them differently. This paper contributes to the field of performance-based building design by offering a means of expressing user activities in a computer-interpretable form and using them in SUA, which informs about space utilization (a performance criterion) of a design option.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Akinci, B., Fischer, M., Kunz, J., and Levitt, R. (2002). “Representing work spaces generically in construction method models.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 296–305.
Angele, J., Kifer, M., and Lausen, G. (2009). “Ontologies in F-logic.” Handbook on ontologies, international handbooks on information systems, S. Staab and R. Studer, eds., Springer, Berlin, 45–70.
Brachman, R., and Levesque, H. (2004). Knowledge representation and reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
Cherry, E. (1999). Programming for design: From theory to practice, Wiley, New York.
Clayton, M., Kunz, J., and Fischer, M. (1998). “The charrette test method.”, Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA.
Clements, P., et al. (2011). Documenting software architectures: Views and beyond, Pearson Education, Boston.
Darwiche, A., Levitt, R., and Hayes-Roth, B. (1988). “OARPLAN: Generating project plans by reasoning about objects, actions and resources.” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 2(3), 169–181.
Dijkstra, J., and Timmermans, H. (2002). “Towards a multi-agent model for visualizing simulated user behavior to support the assessment of design performance.” Autom. Constr., 11(2), 135–145.
Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Ciaramita, M., and Lehmann, J. (2006). “Modelling ontology evaluation and validation.” The semantic web: Research and applications, lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 4011, Springer, Berlin, 140–154.
General Services Administration (GSA). (2007). “GSA building information modeling guide series: 02—GSA BIM guide for spatial program validation.” 〈http://www.gsa.gov/〉 (Jul. 27, 2012).
Gómez-Pérez, A. (1994). “From knowledge based systems to knowledge sharing technology: Evaluation and assessment.”, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford, CA.
Gómez-Pérez, A. (2004). “Ontology evaluation.” Chapter 13, Handbook on ontologies, international handbooks on information systems, Springer, Berlin, 251–273.
Jain, D., Krawinkler, H., and Law, K. (1989). “Knowledge representation with logic.”, Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA.
Kim, T., Rajagopal, R., Fischer, M., and Kam, C. (2013). “A knowledge-based framework for automated space-use analysis.” Autom. Constr., 32, 165–176.
Kiviniemi, A. (2005). “Requirements management interface to building product models.”, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.
Mourgues, C., Fischer, M., and Kunz, J. (2012). “Method to produce field instructions from product and process models for cast-in-place concrete operations.” Autom. Constr., 22, 233–246.
Noy, N., and McGuinness, D. (2001). “Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology.”, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford, CA.
Pan, X., Han, C., Dauber, K., and Law, K. (2007). “A multi-agent based framework for the simulation of human and social behaviors during emergency evacuations.” Ai Soc., 22(2), 113–132.
Peňa, W., and Parshall, S. (2001). Problem seeking: An architectural programming primer, Wiley, New York.
Pennanen, A. (2004). “User activity based workspace definition as an instrument for workplace management in multi-user organizations.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Architecture, Tampere Univ. of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Preiser, W., Rabinowitz, H., and White, E. (1988). Post-occupancy evaluation, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Stanford Univ. (2009). “Stanford University space and furniture planning guidelines.” Dept. of Capital Planning and Space Management, Stanford Univ., 〈http://lbre.stanford.edu/〉 (Sep. 28, 2011).
Staub-French, S., Fischer, M., Kunz, J., and Paulson, B. (2003). “An ontology for relating features with activities to calculate costs.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 243–254.
Tabak, V. (2008). “User simulation of space utilisation.” Ph.D. thesis, Design Systems Group, Eindhoven Univ., Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Ullman, J., and Widom, J. (2007). A first course in database systems, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Wang, H., Boukamp, F., and Elghamrawy, T. (2011). “Ontology-based approach to context representation and reasoning for managing context-sensitive construction information.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 331–346.
Whyte, J., and Gann, D. (2001). “Closing the loop between design and use: Post-occupancy evaluation.” Build. Res. Inf., 29(6), 460–462.
Yan, W., and Kalay, Y. (2006). “Geometric, cognitive, and behavioral modeling of environmental users.” Design Computing and Cognition, Springer, Netherlands, 61–79.
Yu, A., Shen, Q., Kelly, J., Hunter, K., and Ann, T. (2008). “Comparative study of the variables in construction project briefing/architectural programming.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 122–138.
Zimmerman, A., and Martin, M. (2001). “Post-occupancy evaluation: Benefits and barriers.” Build. Res. Inf., 29(2), 168–174.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140 • Issue 8 • August 2014
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 27, 2013
Accepted: Apr 11, 2014
Published online: May 13, 2014
Published in print: Aug 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Oct 13, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.