Technical Papers
Jun 16, 2014

Modeling the Impact of Design Rework on Transportation Infrastructure Construction Project Performance

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140, Issue 9

Abstract

Rework in construction development projects can significantly degrade project cost and schedule performance. Previous research has shown that in a typical construction development project, rework in the construction phase could increase construction cost by up to 12.4% of the contract price. In large, complex projects, undiscovered rework in the design phase can induce rework in the construction phase, thus increasing project cost. The time when rework is discovered during the project development process affects the magnitude of the impact of rework on overall project performance. However, available knowledge is not always successful in improving project managers’ understanding of the feedback mechanisms that drive undiscovered rework impacts on project performance, specifically the interaction between different phases during the developing process. The current work uses a system dynamics model of a two-phase project development cycle to identify high leverage points for minimizing the impacts of rework and ripple effects on project development performance. The work contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing a structured feedback description of how design undiscovered rework combines with ripple effects to impact project performance in both the design and construction phases, as well as evaluating possible solutions to the problem. Model analysis suggests that failing to discover rework near its creation in the project development process can magnify the impact of rework on project performance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Adbel-Hamid, T. K. (1984). “The dynamics of software development project management: An integrative systems dynamics perspective.” Doctoral thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Burati, J., Jr., Farrington, J., and Ledbetter, W. (1992). “Causes of quality deviations in design and construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 34–49.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2001). “The field rework index: Early warning for field rework and cost growth.”, Construction Industry Institute, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Cooper, K. (1993). “The rework cycle: Why projects are mismanaged.” PM Network, 7(2), 5–7.
Cooper, K. (1994). “The $2,000 h: How managers influence project performance through the rework cycle.” Proj. Manage. J., 15(1), 11–24.
Dunston, P. S., McManus, J. F., and Gambatese, J. A. (2002). “Cost/benefits of constructibility reviews.” NCHRP Special Rep., Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Fazio, P., Moselhi, O., Theberge, P., and Revay, S. (1988). “Design impact of construction fast-track.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 6(3), 195–208.
Ford, A. (1999). Modeling the environment, Island, Washington, DC.
Ford, A., and Flynn, H. (2005). “Statistical screening of system dynamics models.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 21(4), 273–303.
Ford, D. (2002). “Achieving multiple project objectives through contingency management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 30–39.
Ford, D., and Sterman, J. (1998). “Modeling dynamic development processes.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 14(1), 31–68.
Ford, D., and Sterman, J. (2003a). “The liar’s club: Impacts of concealment in concurrent development projects.” Concurrent Eng. Res. Appl., 11(3), 211–219.
Ford, D., and Sterman, J. (2003b). “Overcoming the 90% syndrome: Iteration management in concurrent development projects.” Concurrent Eng. Res. Appl., 11(3), 177–186.
Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics, MIT press, Cambridge, MA.
Hwang, B. G., Thomas, S. R., Haas, C. T., and Caldas, C. H. (2009). “Measuring the impact of rework on construction cost performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 187–198.
Josephson, P. E., and Hammarlund, Y. (1999). “The causes and costs of defects in construction: A study of seven building projects.” Autom. Constr., 8(6), 681–687.
Lee, S., Peña-Mora, F., and Park, M. (2005). “Quality and change management model for large scale concurrent design and construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 890–902.
Lee, S., Peña-Mora, F., and Park, M. (2006). “Reliability and stability buffering approach: Focusing on the issues of errors and changes in concurrent design and construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 452–464.
Love, P., Edwards, D., Watson, H., and Davis, P. (2010). “Rework in civil infrastructure projects: Determination of cost predictors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 275–282.
Love, P., Holt, G., Shen, L., Li, H., and Irani, Z. (2002). “Using system dynamics to better understand change and rework in construction project management systems.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 20(6), 425–436.
Love, P., Li, H., Irani, Z., and Faniran, O. (2000a). “Total quality management and the learning organization: A dialogue for change in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 18(3), 321–331.
Love, P., Mandal, P., and Li, H. (1999). “Determining the causal structure of rework influences in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 17(4), 505–517.
Love, P., Mandal, P., Smith, J., and Li, H. (2000b). “Modeling the dynamics of design error induced rework in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 18(5), 567–574.
Love, P. E., and Li, H. (2000). “Quantifying the causes and costs of rework in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 18(4), 479–490.
Love, P. E. D., and Edwards, D. J. (2004) “Determinants of rework in building construction projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 11(4), 259–274.
Lyneis, J. M., and Ford, D. N. (2007). “System dynamics applied to project management: A survey, assessment, and directions for future research.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 23(2–3), 157–189.
Ogunlana, S., Li, H., and Sukhera, F. (2003). “System dynamics approach to exploring performance enhancement in a construction organization.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 528–536.
Park, M., Nepal, M., and Dulaimi, M. (2004). “Dynamic modeling for construction innovation.” J. Manage. Eng., 170–177.
Park, M., and Peña-Mora, F. (2003). “Dynamic change management for construction: Introducing the change cycle into model-based project management.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 19(3), 213–242.
Peña-Mora, F., and Li, M. (2001). “Dynamic planning and control methodology for design/build fast-track construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1–17.
Peña-Mora, F., and Park, M. (2001). “Dynamic planning for fast-tracking building construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 445–456.
Repenning, N. P. (2001). “Understanding fire fighting in new product development.” J. Prod. Innovation Manage., 18(5), 285–300.
Smith, R. P., and Eppinger, S. D. (1997). “Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration.” Manage. Sci., 43(3), 276–293.
Stamatiadis, N., Goodrum, P., Shocklee, E., and Wang, C. (2014). “Quantitative analysis of state transportation agency’s experience with constructability reviews.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04013041.
Stephan, T. D. (1992). “The use of statistical measures to validate system dynamics models.” M.Sc. thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics—Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, McGraw Hill, New York.
Tang, Y., and Ogunlana, S. (2003). “Modeling the dynamic performance of a construction organization.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 21(2), 127–136.
Taylor, T., and Ford, D. (2008). “Managing tipping point dynamics in complex construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 421–431.
Taylor, T., Ford, D., and Reinschmidt, K. (2012a). “Impact of public policy and societal risk perception on U.S. civilian nuclear power plant construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 972–981.
Taylor, T., and Ford, D. N. (2006). “Tipping point failure and robustness in single development projects.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 22(1), 51–71.
Taylor, T., Uddin, M., Goodrum, P., McCoy, A., and Shan, Y. (2012b). “Change orders and lessons learned: Knowledge from statistical analyses of engineering change orders on Kentucky highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1360–1369.
Taylor, T. R., Ford, D. N., and Ford, A. (2010). “Improving model understanding using statistical screening.” Syst. Dyn. Rev., 26(1), 73–87.
Vensim DSS 5.9 [Computer software]. Ventana Systems, Harvard, MA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140Issue 9September 2014

History

Received: Aug 15, 2013
Accepted: Apr 8, 2014
Published online: Jun 16, 2014
Published in print: Sep 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Nov 16, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Doctoral Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0281 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Timothy R. B. Taylor, M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0281.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share