Investigating Enterprise Risk Management Maturity in Construction Firms
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140, Issue 8
Abstract
Enterprise risk management (ERM), as a holistic approach to risk management, has been advocated in the construction industry. The objectives of this paper are to assess the ERM maturity in Chinese construction firms (CCFs) based in Singapore and uncover how ERM was implemented in these firms. Through a questionnaire survey with 35 CCFs, the data relating to ERM implementation were collected. The analysis results indicated a low level of ERM maturity in these firms, and the positive association between ERM maturity and firm size. In addition, risk communication, objective setting, and risk-aware culture were the top three scores, while formalized key risk indicators and a risk management information system were the bottom two scores. Moreover, three case studies were conducted. The cross-case comparison results substantiated the survey findings, highlighted the influence of the parent firms on the ERM implementation, and indicated that the firms without formal ERM implementation can still have some practices consistent with the ERM fundamentals. These empirical results are arguably the first to be presented for the construction industry and therefore add to existing knowledge of ERM. In addition, various organizational issues have been identified that may influence ERM maturity. The future development of the ERM body of knowledge can, for enhancement purposes, take into account ERM maturity as well as the organizational issues for implementation. Furthermore, the ERM maturity of Singapore-based CCFs can serve as a ballpark benchmark, with which the other firms can compare in terms of ERM practices, and the similar research design and method can be used to investigate ERM implementation in CCFs located in other countries. Therefore, this paper significantly contributes to the ERM body of knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Abowitz, D., and Toole, T. (2010). “Mixed method research: fundamental issues of design, validity, and reliability in construction research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 108–116.
Aon Analytics. (2010). Global risk management survey 2010, Chicago.
Building and Construction Authority (BCA). (2013). “Contractors registry.” 〈http://www.bca.gov.sg/ContractorsRegistry/contractors_tendering_limits.html〉 (May 30, 2013).
Beasley, M. S., Branson, B. C., and Hancock, B. V. (2010). Developing key risk indicators to strengthen enterprise risk management, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, Raleigh, NC.
Beasley, M. S., Clune, R., and Hermanson, D. R. (2005). “Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation.” J. Account Publ. Pol., 24(6), 521–531.
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research, Free Press, Glencoe, IL.
Cochran, W. G. (1954). “Some methods for strengthening the common tests.” Biometrics, 10(4), 417–451.
Colquitt, L., Hoyt, R., and Lee, R. (1999). “Integrated risk management and the role of the risk manager.” Risk Manage. Insur. Rev., 2(3), 43–61.
Deloitte. (2010). “Enterprise risk management (ERM): Success through intelligent risk taking.” 〈http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-Lebanon/Local%20Assets/Documents/ERS/me_ers_erm_09.pdf〉 (Mar. 3, 2011).
Espersen, D. (2007). “The language of risk.” Internal Auditor, 64(3), 69–73.
Everitt, B. S. (1992). The analysis of contingency tables, CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., and Tseng, C. Y. (2009). “Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective.” J. Account. Publ. Pol., 28(4), 301–327.
Hallowell, M., Molenaar, K., and Fortunato, B. III (2013). “Enterprise risk management strategies for state departments of transportation.” J. Manage. Eng., 114–121.
Hopkin, P. (2010). Fundamentals of risk management, Kogan Page, London.
Hoyt, R. E., and Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). “The value of enterprise risk management.” J. Risk Insur., 78(4), 795–822.
Laslo, Z., and Goldberg, A. I. (2008). “Resource allocation under uncertainty in a multi-project matrix environment: Is organizational conflict inevitable?” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 26(8), 773–788.
Liebenberg, A. P., and Hoyt, R. E. (2003). “The determinants of enterprise risk management: Evidence from the appointment of chief risk officers.” Risk Manage. Insur. Rev., 6(1), 37–52.
Liu, J., Zou, P., and Gong, W. (2013). “Managing project risk at enterprise level: Exploratory case studies in China.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1268–1274.
Love, P. E. D., Holt, G. D., and Li, H. (2002). “Triangulation in construction management research.” Eng. Construct. Architect. Manage., 9(4), 294–303.
Lu, W., Li, H., Shen, L., and Huang, T. (2009). “Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of Chinese construction companies in the global market.” J. Manage. Eng., 166–176.
McGeorge, D., and Zou, P. X. W. (2013). Construction management: New directions, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, U.K.
Ministry of Manpower (MOM). (2006). Workplace safety and health risk management: Risk assessment guidelines, Singapore.
Negnevitsky, M. (2006). Artificial intelligence: A guide to intelligent systems, Pearson, New York.
Pedrycz, W., Ekel, P., and Parreiras, R. (2011). Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: Models, methods and applications, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC). (2006). Guidance to enterprise risk management for central enterprises, Beijing.
Thevendran, V., and Mawdesley, M. J. (2004). “Perception of human risk factors in construction projects: An exploratory study.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 22(2), 131–137.
Wang, J., and Yuan, H. (2011). “Factors affecting contractors’ risk attitudes in construction projects: Case study from China.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 29(2), 209–219.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Zhao, X., Hwang, B., and Low, S. (2013). “Developing fuzzy enterprise risk management maturity model for construction firms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000712, 1179–1189.
Zhi, H. (1995). “Risk management for overseas construction projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 13(4), 231–237.
Zimmermann, H. J. (2001). Fuzzy set theory and its applications, Kluwer, Boston.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140 • Issue 8 • August 2014
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 5, 2013
Accepted: Mar 18, 2014
Published online: Apr 21, 2014
Published in print: Aug 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Sep 21, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.