Technical Papers
Aug 22, 2013

Project Pathogens Network: New Approach to Analyzing Construction-Defects-Generation Mechanisms

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140, Issue 1

Abstract

Construction defects can exert significant impacts on project performance. These defects are typically traced back to their initiating root causes, formulated as infectious decisions, practices, or circumstances. The root causes often act as pathogens that propagate to spread numerous other risky conditions, thereby making projects prone to defects. Accordingly, it is essential to quantify the pathogenic capacity held by each root cause to determine the scope of potential risk associated with its existence. Although several studies have striven to identify project pathogens, research on determining the most pathogenic causes to develop further defect management efforts is lacking. To address this deficiency, the aim of this study was to develop a methodology that captures the complex mechanisms of defect generation and quantifies their pathogenic capacities in accordance to their position within the network of sequential events leading to defects. Specifically, the study uses a social network analysis (SNA) approach as a platform to formulate the interrelationships of defect causes, and review SNA metrics to develop a formal mathematical expression of pathogenicity, forming a new project pathogens network (PPN) methodology. Application to four residential projects in Dubai confirmed that PPN has great potential for revealing the pathogenic capacities held by the infectious conditions resulting in construction defects. This paper contributes to knowledge in the area of construction engineering and management by proposing a methodology that is deliberated to providing both mathematical and visualization analyses needed to address the complex mechanisms of defect generation, which thus enables project practitioners and academics to better understand the vulnerability of a construction-project system to pathogenic conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Adams, F. K. (2008). “Risk perception and Bayesian analysis of international construction contract risks: The case of payment delays in a developing economy.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 26(2), 138–148.
Aljassmi, H., and Han, S. (2012). “Classification and occurrence of defective acts in residential construction projects.” J. Civil Eng. Manage., in press.
Aljassmi, H., and Han, S. (2013). “Analysis of causes of construction defects using fault trees and risk importance measures.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 139(7), 870–880.
Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., and Vespignani, A. (2004). “The architecture of complex weighted networks.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101(11), 3747–3752.
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., and Jacomy, M. (2009). “Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks.” Int. AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA.
Birnbaum, L. W. (1969). “On the importance of different elements in a multi-element system.” Multivariate analysis, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York.
Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends of friends, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
Bonacich, P. (1987). “Power and centrality: A family of measures.” Am. J. Sociol., 92(5), 1170–1182.
Borgatti, S. P. (2005). “Centrality and network flow.” Social Networks, 27(1), 55–71.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., and Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.
Brandes, U. (2001). “A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality.” J. Math. Sociol., 25(2), 163–177.
Busby, J. S., and Hughes, E. J. (2004). “Projects, pathogens and incubation periods.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 22(5), 425–434.
Cartwright, N., and Pemberton, J. M. (2013). “Aristotelian powers: Without them what would modern science do?” Powers and capacities in philosophy: The new Aristotelianism, J. Greco and R. Gross, eds., Routledge, New York.
Chapman, R. (1998). “The role of system dynamics in understanding the impact of changes to key project personnel on design production within construction projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 16(4), 235–247.
Chinowsky, P., Diekmann, J., and Galotti, V. (2008). “Social network model of construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(10), 804–812.
Chinowsky, P., Taylor, J. E., and Di Marco, M. (2011). “Project network interdependency alignment: New approach to assessing project effectiveness.” J. Manage. Eng., 27(3), 170–178.
Construction Industry Institute. (2002). “CII best practice guide.”, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Dijkstra, E. W. (1959). “A note on two problems in connexion with graphs.” Numer. Math., 1(1), 269–271.
Doreian, P. (2001). “Causality in social network analysis.” Sociol. Methods Res., 30(1), 81–114.
Doreian, P. (2002). “Event sequences as generators of social network evolution.” Social Networks, 24(2), 93–119.
Fayek, A. R., Dissanayake, M., and Campero, O. (2004). “Developing a standard methodology for measuring and classifying construction field rework.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 31(6), 1077–1089.
Freeman, L. C. (1978). “Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification.” Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.
Han, S., Lee, S., and Peña-Mora, F. (2012). “Identification and quantification of non-value-adding effort from errors and changes in design and construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 138(1), 98–109.
Han, S., Love, P. E. D., and Peña-Mora, F. (2013). “A system dynamics model for assessing the impacts of design errors in construction projects.” J. Math. Comput. Modell., 57(9–10), 2044–2053.
Josephson, P. E., and Hammarlund, Y. (1999). “The causes of costs of defects in construction: A study of seven building projects.” Autom. Constr., 8(6), 681–687.
Kilduf, M., and Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations, Sage Publications, London, UK.
Kim, D. Y., Han, S. H., Kim, H., and Park, H. (2009). “Structuring the prediction model of project performance for international construction projects: A comparative analysis.” Expert Syst. Appl., 36(2), 1961–1971.
Larsen, G. D. (2011). “Understanding the early stages of the innovation diffusion process: Awareness, influence and communication networks.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 29(10), 987–1002.
Li, Y., Lu, Y., Kwak, Y. H., Le, Y., and He, Q. (2011). “Social network analysis and organizational control in complex projects: Construction of EXPO 2010 in China.” Eng. Proj. Organ. J., 1(4), 223–237.
Love, P. E. D. (2002). “Auditing the indirect consequences of rework in construction: A case based approach.” Manage. Audit. J., 17(3), 138–146.
Love, P. E. D., and Edwards, D. J. (2004). “Forensic project management: The underlying causes of rework in construction projects.” Civil Eng. Environ. Syst., 21(3), 207–228.
Love, P. E. D., Edwards, D. J., Irani, Z., and Walker, D. H. T. (2009). “Project pathogens: The anatomy of omission errors in construction and resource engineering projects.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 56(3), 425–435.
Luu, V. T., Kim, S., Tuan, N. V., and Ogunlana, S. O. (2009). “Quantifying schedule risk in construction projects using Bayesian belief networks.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 27(1), 39–50.
Mills, A., Love, P. E. D., and Williams, P. (2009). “Defect costs in residential construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(1), 12–16.
Mitchell, J. C. (1969). “The concept and use of social networks.” Social networks in urban situations, J. C. Mitchell, ed., Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK.
Molenaar, K., Washington, S., and Diekmann, J. (2000). “Structural equation model of construction contract dispute potential.” J. Civil Eng. Manage., 126(4), 268–277.
Newman, M. E. (2001). “Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality.” Phys. Rev. E, 64(1), 64–70.
Nohria, N. (1992). “Is network perspective a useful way of studying organizations?” Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, N. Nohria and R. G. Eccles, eds., Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., and Skvoretz, J. (2010). “Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths.” Social Networks, 32(3), 245–251.
Padulo, L., and Arbib, M. (1974). System theory: A unified state-space approach to continuous and discrete systems, Saunders, Philadelphia.
Palaneeswaran, E., Love., P. E. D., Kumaraswamy, M. M., and Ng, T. S. T. (2008). “Mapping rework causes and effects using artificial neural networks.” Build. Res. Inf., 36(5), 450–465.
Park, H., Han, S. H., Rojas, E. M., Son, J., and Jung, W. (2011). “Social network analysis of collaborative ventures for overseas construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 137(5), 344–355.
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents—Living with high-risk technologies, Basic Books, New York.
Pryke, S. D. (2004). “Analysing construction project coalitions: Exploring the application of social network analysis.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 22(8), 787–797.
Pryke, S. D. (2012). Social network analysis in construction, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
Reason, J. T. (1990). Human error, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Reason, J. T. (1995). “Understanding adverse events: Human factors.” Qual. Health Care, 4(2), 80–89.
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook, Sage Publications, London, UK.
Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of George Simmel, Trans. K. Wolff. Free Press, New York.
Tijms, H. (2007). Understanding probability: Chance rules in everyday life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Ward, S. C. (1999). “Assessing and managing important risks.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 17(6), 331–336.
Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Watt, D. (1999). Building pathology principles and practice, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
Wheeler, H., and Luke, H. H. (1963). “Microbial toxins in plant disease.” Ann. Rev. Microbiol., 17(1), 223–242.
Wiegmann, D. A., and Shappell, S. A. (2003). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system, Ashgate Publishing, Burlington, VT.
Zhou, X. H., Wang, L., and Cheng, Q. (2012). “Research on application of SNA in tacit knowledge management of project team.” Adv. Eng. Forum 6–7(1), 1173–1176.
Zhu, K., Zhang, W., Zhu, G., Zhang, Y., and Lin, X. (2011). “BMC: An efficient method to evaluate probabilistic reachability queries.” Database Systems for Advanced Applications: 16th Int. Conf. DASFAA 2011, Hong Kong, China, Proc., Part I, J. X. Yu, M. H. Kim, and R. Unland, eds., Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, New York.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 140Issue 1January 2014

History

Received: Feb 12, 2013
Accepted: Jul 1, 2013
Published online: Aug 22, 2013
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Jan 22, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hamad Aljassmi
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.
Sangwon Han [email protected]
M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Seoul, Seoul 130-743, Korea (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Steven Davis
Lecturer, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share