Decision Support System–Enhanced Scheduling in Matrix Organizations Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 11
Abstract
This paper presents a conceptual approach to scheduling multiple projects in a matrix organization with rapidly changing and sometimes competing objectives using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) within a decision support system (DSS). This approach increased the analytical capabilities and scheduling efficacy of traditional scheduling processes in a medium-sized electric utility company. The purpose of this paper is to establish a logical framework for scheduling multiple projects with competing priorities while taking into account all known corporate organizational constraints. Traditional scheduling techniques such as the program evaluation and review technique and critical-path method are heavily based on time constraints and resource availability, neglecting factors such as customer satisfaction, organizational financial objectives, political risks, and other intangible parameters that greatly influence scheduling processes. The primary contribution of this paper is a conceptual framework that offers a platform to incorporate tangible and intangible variables into a decision support system using AHP for scheduling multiple projects with competing objectives in matrix organizations. The results of the application showed that, when compared with traditional scheduling methods, this DSS model with integrated AHP showed improvements in prioritizing in accordance with political risks, cash-flow demands, and crew allocation. It appears to be a superior solution for solving prioritization issues in matrix organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers give special thanks to the Omaha Public Power District and the employees of the Integrated Work Management (IWM) department for their cooperation and input during the course of the research reported in this paper.
References
Abdelgawad, M., and Fayek, A. (2010). “Risk management in the construction industry using combined fuzzy FMEA and fuzzy AHP.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(9), 1028–1036.
Aczel, J., and Saaty, T. L. (1983). “Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements.” J. Med. Psychol., 27(1), 93–102.
Ahuja, V., and Thiruvengadam, V. (2004). “Project scheduling and monitoring: Current research status.” J. Constr. Innov., 4(1), 19–31.
Anagnostopoulos, K., and Koulinas, G. (2012). “Resource-constrained critical path scheduling by a GRASP-based hyperheuristic.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 26(2), 204–213.
Arditi, D., Elhassan, A., and Toklu, Y. (2002). “Constructability analysis in the design firm.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(2), 117–126.
Chan, F. T. S., and Chung, S. H. (2005). “Multicriterion genetic optimization for due date assigned distribution network problems.” Decis. Support Syst., 39(4), 661–675.
Chua, D. K. H., Kog, Y. C., and Loh, P. K. (1999). “Critical success factors for different project objectives.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(3), 142–150.
Eom, C. S. J., and Paek, J. H. (2009). “Risk index model for minimizing environmental disputes in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(1), 34–41.
Ergu, D., Kou, G., Peng, Y., and Shi, Y. (2013). “The analytic hierarchy process: Task scheduling and resource allocation in cloud computing environment.” J. Supercomput., 64(3), 835–848.
Faniran, O. O., Oluwoye, J. O., and Lenard, D. J. (1998). “Interactions between construction planning and influence factors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(4), 245–256.
Haq, A. N., Karthikeyan, T., and Dinesh, M. (2003). “Scheduling decisions in FMS using a heuristic approach.” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 22(5–6), 374–379.
Holguin-Veras, J. (1995). “Comparative assessment of AHP and MAV in highway planning: Case study.” J. Transp. Eng., 121(2), 191–200.
Huang, J.-J. (2011). “A matrix method for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.” Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzz. Knowl.-Based Syst., 19(2), 401–414.
Ishizaka, A., and Labib, A. (2011). “Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process.” J. Expert Syst. Appl., 38(11), 14336–14345.
Jaganathan, S., Erinjeri, J. J., and Ker, J. (2007). “Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based group decision support system to select and evaluate new manufacturing technologies.” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 32(11–12), 1253–1262.
Jun, D. H., and El-Rayes, K. (2011). “Multiobjective optimization of resource leveling and allocation during construction scheduling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 137(12), 1080–1088.
Karim, A., and Adeli, H. (1999). “Object oriented information model for construction project management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(5), 361–367.
Karumanasseri, G., and AbouRizk, S. (2002). “Decision support system for scheduling steel fabrication projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(5), 392–399.
Kim, J.-L., and Ellis, R. D., Jr. (2009). “Robust global and local search approach to resource-constrained project scheduling.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 36(3), 375–388.
Kolisch, R., and Hartmann, S. (2006). “Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: An update.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 174(1), 23–37.
Lee, C.-E., and Hsu, S.-C. (2004). “Outsourcing capacity planning for an IC design house.” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 24(3–4), 306–320.
Lee, H.-S., and Yi, K. J. (1999). “Application of mathematical matrix to integrate project schedule and cost.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(5), 339–346.
Leu, S.-S., and Yang, C.-H. (1999). “Genetic algorithm-based multicriteria optimal model for construction scheduling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(6), 420–427.
Li, S. (1996). “New approach for optimization of overall construction schedule.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 122(1), 7–13.
Momoh, J. A., and Zhu, J. (2003). “Optimal generation scheduling based on AHP/ANP.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B, 33(3), 531–535.
Özceylan, E. (2010). “A decision support system to compare the transportation modes in logistic.” Int. J. Lean Think., 1(1), 58–83.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2008). A guide to the Project Management body of knowledge, 4th Ed., Newtown Square, PA.
Project Manager 6.2.1 SP1 [Computer software]. Primavera Systems, Philadelphia.
RightChoiceDSS 2.1.98 [Computer software]. Tier 3, Bellevue, WA.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytical hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saaty, T. L. (2001a). Decision making for leaders, 3rd Ed., Vol. 2, RWS Publications, New York.
Saaty, T. L. (2001b). “The seven pillars of the analytic hierarchy process.” Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process, Springer, New York, 27–46.
Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. (2005). “The possibility of group welfare functions.” Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decis. Making, 4(2), 167–176.
Shapira, A., and Goldenberg, M. (2005). “AHP-based equipment selection model for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(12), 1263–1273.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139 • Issue 11 • November 2013
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 10, 2012
Accepted: May 13, 2013
Published online: May 15, 2013
Published in print: Nov 1, 2013
Discussion open until: Jan 5, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.