Technical Papers
Dec 10, 2012

Optimal Incentive Contract with Risk-Neutral Contractor

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 8

Abstract

Incentive clauses within contracts, referred to as incentive contracts in this paper, based on a sharing of the project outcome are regarded as an important vehicle to align contractor interests with that of the owner. However, discussion is ongoing as to what is the optimal incentive arrangement. This paper derives an optimal incentive contract for a risk-neutral contractor; the owner may be either risk averse or risk neutral. An incentive is established based on a sharing of a project’s equivalent monetary outcome (expressed relative to a benchmark or target that is desired by the owner), while aligning the contractor’s interests with those of the owner. The derivation is based on solving an optimization problem. The paper shows that at the optimum and expressed relative to the target, any favorable or adverse outcome associated with both the contractor’s effort and events beyond the contractor’s influence should, respectively, be wholly received by or wholly borne by a risk-neutral contractor. Practitioners were interviewed to validate this result. This paper gives an original solution to the optimal sharing problem in incentive construction contracts, contributing to current practices in contracts management. The solution follows an ordered argument and is usable by practitioners. Additionally, this paper extends agency theory on risk-averse principals. This paper will be of interest to academics and practitioners concerned with the design of incentive contracts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Al-Bahar, J. F., and Crandall, K. C. (1990). “Systematic risk management approach for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 116(3), 533–546.
Al-Subhi Al-Harbi, K. M. (1998). “Sharing fractions in cost-plus-incentive-fee contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage., 16(2), 73–80.
Ang, A. H. S., and Tang, W. (1975). Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, Vol. I, Wiley, New York.
Antill, J. M. (1970). Civil engineering management, Angus and Robertson, Sydney.
Badenfelt, U. (2008). “The selection of sharing ratios in target cost contracts.” Eng. Construct. Architect. Manag., 15(1), 54–65.
Bartling, B., and Von Siemens, F. A. (2010). “The intensity of incentives in firms and markets: moral hazard with envious agents.” Labour Econ., 17(3), 598–607.
Basu, A. K., and Kalyanaram, G. (1990). “On the relative performance of linear versus nonlinear compensation plans.” Int. J. Res. Marketing, 7(2–3), 171–179.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, statistics and decision for civil engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Bolton, P., and Dewatripont, M. (2005). Contract theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bubshait, A. A. (2003). “Incentive/disincentive contracts and its effect on industrial projects.” Int. J. Project Manage., 21(1), 63–70.
Carmichael, D. G. (2000). Contracts and international project management, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Carmichael, D. G. (2002). Disputes and international projects, A. A. Balkema, Lisse, Netherlands.
Carmichael, D. G. (2004). Project management framework, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Cheung, S.-O., Ng, T. S. T., Wong, S.-T., and Suen, H. C. H. (2003). “Behavioral aspects in construction partnering.” Int. J. Project Manage., 21(5), 333–343.
Clemen, R. T., and Reilly, T. (2001). Making hard decisions with decision tools, Duxbury/Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). “Agency theory: An assessment and review.” Acad. Manage. Rev., 14(1), 57–74.
Ekanayake, S. (2004). “Agency theory, national culture and management control systems.” J. Am. Acad. Bus., 4(1/2), 49–54.
Goodwin, P., and Wright, G. (2003). Decision analysis for management judgment, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Harmon, K. M. J. (2003). “Conflicts between owner and contractors, proposed intervention process.” J. Manage. Eng., 19(3), 121–125.
Hauck, A. J., Walker, D. H. T., Hampson, K. D., and Peters, R. J. (2004). “Project alliancing at the National Museum of Australia—Collaborative process.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(1), 143–152.
Holmstrom, B. (1979). “Moral hazard and observability.” Bell J. Econ., 10(1), 74–91.
Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P. (1987). “Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives.” Econometrica, 55(2), 303–328.
Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P. (1991). “Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design.” J. Law Econ. Organ., 7, 24–52.
Howard, R. A. (1988). “Decision analysis: Practice and promise.” Manage. Sci., 34(6), 679–695.
Huang, M., Chen, G., Ching, W.-K., and Siu, T. K. (2010). “Principal-agent theory based risk allocation model for virtual enterprise.” J. Serv. Sci. Manag., 3(2), 241–250.
Kadefors, A. (2004). “Trust in project relationships—Inside the black box.” Int. J. Project Manage., 22(3), 175–182.
Kirkwood, C. W. (2004). “Approximating risk aversion in decision analysis applications.” Decis. Anal., 1(1), 51–67.
Kraus, S. (1996). “An overview of incentive contracting.” Artif. Intell., 83(2), 297–346.
Laffont, J. J., and Martimort, D. (2002). The theory of incentives: The principal-agent model, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Larson, E. (1997). “Partnering on construction projects: A study of the relationship between partnering activities and project success.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 44(2), 188–195.
Love, P. E. D., Davis, P. R., Chevis, R., and Edwards, D. J. (2011). “Risk/reward compensation model for civil engineering infrastructure alliance projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 137(2), 127–136.
Lyons, T., and Skitmore, M. (2004). “Project risk management in Queensland engineering construction industry: A survey.” Int. J. Project Manage., 22(1), 51–61.
Mann, P. S. (2001). Introductory statistics, Wiley, New York.
McGeorge, D., and Palmer, A. (2002). Construction management new directions, 2nd Ed., Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
Miller, J. G. (2005). “Solutions to principal-agent problems in firms.” Handbook of new institutional economics, C. Menard and M. M. Shirley, eds., Springer, New York, 349–370.
Pratt, J. W. (1964). “Risk aversion in the small and in the large.” Econometrica, 32(1/2), 122–136.
Puddicombe, M. S. (2009). “Why contracts: Evidence.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(8), 675–682.
Raju, J. S., and Srinivasan, V. (1996). “Quota-based compensation plans for multiterritory heterogeneous salesforces.” Manage. Sci., 42(10), 1454–1462.
Rasmusen, E. (2007). Games and information: An introduction to game theory, Blackwell, Malden, MA.
Ross, J. (2003). “Introduction to project alliancing.” 〈http://www.pci-aus.com/files/resources/Alliancing_30Apr03_F.pdf〉 (Dec. 15, 2011).
Shek Pui Wong, P., and Cheung, S.-O. (2004). “Trust in construction partnering: Views from parties of the partnering dance.” Int. J. Project Manage., 22(6), 437–446.
Shek Pui Wong, P., and Sai On, C. (2005). “Structural equation model of trust and partnering success.” J. Manage. Eng., 21(2), 70–80.
Shr, J.-F., and Chen, W. T. (2004). “Setting maximum incentive for incentive/disincentive contracts for highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(1), 84–93.
Smith, M. E., Zsidisin, G. A., and Adams, L. L. (2005). “An agency theory perspective on student performance evaluation.” Decis. Sci. J. Innovat. Educ., 3(1), 29–46.
Stevens, D. E., and Thevaranjan, A. (2010). “A moral solution to the moral hazard problem.” Accounting Organiz. Soc., 35(1), 125–139.
Tiong, R. L. K. (1990). “Comparative study of BOT projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 6(1), 107–122.
Uher, E. T., and Toakley, R. A. (1999). “Risk management in the conceptual phase of a project.” Int. J. Project Manage., 17(3), 161–169.
Van Ackere, A. (1993). “The principal/agent paradigm: Its relevance to various functional fields.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 70(1), 83–103.
Veld, J. I., and Peeters, W. A. (1989). “Keeping large projects under control: The importance of contract type selection.” Int. J. Project Manage., 7(3), 155–162.
Walker, D., Hampson, K., and Peters, R. (2000). Relationship-based procurement strategies for the 21st century, AusInfo, Canberra, Australia.
Willenbrock, J. H. (1973). “Utility function determination for bidding models.” J. Constr. Div., 99(1), 133–153.
Yeung, J. F. Y., Chan, A. P. C., and Chan, D. W. M. (2007). “The definition of alliancing in construction as a Wittgenstein Family-Resemblance concept.” Int. J. Project Manage., 25(3), 219–231.
Zhao, H. (2005). “Incentive-based compensation to advertising agencies: A principal-agent approach.” Int. J. Res. Marketing, 22(3), 255–275.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139Issue 8August 2013
Pages: 899 - 909

History

Received: Dec 20, 2011
Accepted: Nov 30, 2012
Published online: Dec 10, 2012
Discussion open until: May 10, 2013
Published in print: Aug 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

S. Mahdi Hosseinian [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 NSW Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
David G. Carmichael [email protected]
M.ASCE
Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New South Wales, Sydney 2052 NSW Australia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share