Technical Papers
Sep 27, 2012

Determining Optimal Proportion of Design in Design-Build Request for Proposals

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 6

Abstract

The design-build (DB) system is a popular and effective delivery method of construction projects worldwide. After owners decide to procure their projects through the DB system, they may wish to determine the optimal proportion of design to be provided in the DB request for proposals (RFP), which serves as a solicitation for design-builders and describes the scope of work. However, this presents difficulties to DB owners and there is little, if any, systematic research in this area. This paper reports on an empirical study in the United States entailing both an online questionnaire survey and Delphi survey to identify and evaluate the factors influencing owners’ decisions in determining the proportion of design to include in DB RFPs. Eleven factors are identified, i.e., (1) clarity of project scope, (2) applicability of performance specifications, (3) desire for design innovation, (4) site constraints, (5) availability of competent design-builders, (6) project control requirements, (7) user group involvement level, (8) third-party requirements, (9) owner experience with DB, (10) project complexity, and (11) schedule constraints. A statistically significant agreement on the 11 factors was also obtained from the (mainly nonowner) Delphi experts. Although some of the experts hold different opinions on how these factors affect the proportion of design, these findings furnish various stakeholders with a better understanding of the delivery process of DB projects and the appropriate provision of project information in DB RFPs. Because the result is mainly industry opinion concerning the optimal proportion of design, in addition and for completeness future studies should be conducted to obtain a big picture of the optimal proportion of design by means of seeking owners’ inputs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. (2005). “Design-build environmental process and level of detail: Eight case studies.” Washington, DC, 〈http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(12)_FR.pdf〉 (Jun. 2010).
AASHTO. (2008). AASHTO guide for DB procurement, Washington, DC.
Adnan, H., and Morledge, R. (2003). “Application of Delphi method on critical success factors in joint venture projects in the Malaysian construction industry.” Proc., of CITC-II Conf., Hong Kong.
ASCE Committee on Specifications. (2008). Preparing requests for proposals and specifications for design-build projects, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Austin, S., Newton, A., Steele, J., and Waskett, P. (2002). “Modeling and managing project complexity.” Int. J. Project Manage., 20(3), 191–198.
Baccarini, D. (1996). “The concept of project complexity—A review.” Int. J. Project Manage., 14(4), 201–204.
Beard, J. L., Loulakis, S. R. M. C., and Wundram, E. C. (2001). Design-build—Planning through development, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cabaniss, K. (2002). “Computer-related technology use by counselors in the new millennium: A Delphi study.” J. Tech. Counsel., 2(2), 3–34.
Chan, A. P. C., Scott, D., and Chan, A. P. L. (2004). “Factors affecting the success of a construction project.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(1), 153–155.
Chan, A. P. C., Yung, E. H. K., Lam, P. T. I., Tam, C. M., and Cheung, S. O. (2001). “Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 19(7), 699–718.
Chen, C. H. (2004). “Effect of completion level of owner’s basic design in design-build projects.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Construction Engineering, National Kaohsiung First Univ. of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
del Puerto, C. L., Gransberg, D. D., and Shane, J. S. (2008). “Comparative analysis of owner goals for design/build projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 24(1), 32–39.
Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA). (2009). “Find a certified design-build professional.” 〈http://www.dbia.org/Certification/Search〉 (Oct. 1, 2009).
Doke, E. R., and Swanson, N. E. (1995). “Decision variables for selecting prototyping in information systems development: A Delphi study of MIS managers.” Inf. Manage., 29(4), 173–182.
Doyle, A., and Hughes, W. (2000). “The influence of project complexity on estimating accuracy.” 16th Annual Conf., Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Reading, 623–634.
El Wardani, M. A., Messner, J. I., and Horman, M. J. (2006). “Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(3), 230–238.
Federal Highway Administration. (2006). “Design-build effectiveness study.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/designbuild/designbuild0.htm〉 (Jun. 1, 2010).
Fellows, R., and Liu, A. (2008). Research methods for construction, 3rd Ed., Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
Gransberg, D., and Windel, E. (2008). “Communicating design quality requirements for public sector design/build projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 24(2), 105–110.
Gransberg, D. D., Koch, J. E., and Molenaar, K. R. (2006). Preparing for design-build projects, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Gransberg, D. D., Molenaar, K. R., and Datin, J. N. (2008). “Quality assurance in design-build projects.”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
Hale, D. R., Shrestha, P. P., Gibson, G. E., and Migliaccio, G. C. (2009). “Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(7), 579–587.
Haque, M. E., Alkaabi, N., and Arosha, D. S. (2001). “Selection of a right project delivery system: A tabular knowledge base approach.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Construction Project Management, Nanyang Technical University, Taipei, Taiwan, 471–480.
Harris, F., and McCaffer, R. (1995). Modern construction management, BSP Professional Books, Oxford, UK.
Janssens, D. E. L. (1991). Design-build explained, Macmillan Education, London.
Konchar, M., and Sanvido, V. (1998). “Comparison of U.S project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(6), 435–444.
Lam, E. W. M., Chan, A. P. C., and Chan, D. W. M. (2008). “Determinants of successful design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(5), 334–341.
Leung, K. S. (1999). “Characteristics of design and build projects.” Seminar Proc. on Design and Build Procurement System, Construction Industry Training Authority, Hong Kong, 1–10.
Ludwig, B. (1997). “Predicting the future: Have you considered using Delphi methodology?” J. Extension, 35(5).
Mangione, T. W. (1995). Mailed survey: Improving the quality, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Masini, E. (1993). Why future studies? Grey Seal, London.
Migliaccio, G. C., Gibson, G. E., and O'Connor, J. T. (2009). “Procurement of design-build services: Two-phase selection for highway projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 25(1), 29–39.
Mo, J. K. W., and Ng, L. Y. (1997). “Design and build procurement method in Hong Kong—An overview.” Procurement—A Key to Innovation, CIB Publications, Montreal, 453–462.
Mogaibel, H. (1999). “Project delivery systems of mining projects.”, King Fahd Univ. of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Molenaar, K. R., and Songer, A. D. (1998). “Model for public sector design-build project selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(6), 467–479.
Molenaar, K. R., Songer, A. D., and Barash, M. (1999). “Public-sector design/build evolution and performance.” J. Manage. Eng., 15(2), 54–62.
Outhred, G. P. (2001). “The Delphi method: A demonstration of its use for specific research types.” COBRA 2001: Proc. of the RICS Foundation, Construction and Building, J. Kelly and K. Hunter, eds., The RICS Foundation, London.
Pearson, M., and Skues, D. (1999). “Control of projects implemented through design and build contracts.” Seminar Proc. on Design and Build Procurement System, Construction Industry Training Authority, Hong Kong, 49–60.
Schmidt, R., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., and Cule, P. (2001). “Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study.” J. Manage. Inf. Syst., 17(4), 5–36.
Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., and Preece, J. (2007). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction, 2nd Ed., Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Songer, A. D., and Molenaar, K. R. (1997). “Project characteristic for successful public sector design-build.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(1), 34–40.
Stone, F. L., and Busby, D. M. (1996). The Delphi method, research methods in family therapy, Guildford, New York.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis, 2nd Ed., SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
Xia, B., and Chan, A. P. C. (2012). “Identification of selection criteria for operational variations of the design-build system: A Delphi study in China.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage., 18(2), 173–183.
Yeung, J. F., Chan, A. P., and Chan, D. W. (2009). “Developing a performance index for relationship-based construction projects in Australia: Delphi study.” J. Manage. Eng., 25(2), 59–68.
Ziglio, E. (1996). The Delphi method and its contribution to decision making, gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health, Jessica Kingsley Publisher, London.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139Issue 6June 2013
Pages: 620 - 627

History

Received: Dec 4, 2011
Accepted: Sep 25, 2012
Published online: Sep 27, 2012
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Garden Point Campus, 2 George St., Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Keith Molenaar [email protected]
M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 428, ECOT 643, Boulder, CO 80302. E-mail: [email protected]
Albert Chan [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hung Hum, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Martin Skitmore [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Garden Point Campus, 2 George St., Brisbane QLD 4000, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, School of Natural and Built Environments, Univ. of South Australia, City East Campus, GPO Box 2471 Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share