Cost-Benefit Analysis of Construction Information Management System Implementation: Case Study
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139, Issue 4
Abstract
In construction projects, construction managers spend a significant portion of their time gathering project data, assessing production rates, communicating with project participants, and tracking project quality. Executing those tasks manually reduces efficiency and can result in less effective project management operations. In order to improve efficiency of information process flow, various types of construction information management systems (CIMSs) have been introduced to construction projects. However, due to the difficulty of tracking fragmental and illusive data, measuring the cost and benefit of the implementation and evaluating the trade-off remain a challenge for construction practitioners. This paper’s contributions to the body of knowledge include (1) proposing a framework to assess tangible and semitangible or intangible costs and benefits of innovative construction technology application, (2) determining costs and benefits of the use of CIMSs by conducting a product-specific case study, and (3) summarizing lessons learned through the application of a CIMS from the first-hand users so that construction managers can avoid pitfalls in other projects. This study provides data collected during real-time immersion in the project as part of the project team over a 6 month period. The study found that the use of CIMSs, coupled with mobile technologies, increased efficiency and decreased clerical time of operations-level construction personnel, and thereby increased value to the project through improved allocation of managerial time. The internal observation and analysis provide a useful guidance to project managers who are interested in implementing CIMS in construction projects.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Skanska Building, USA, which generously provided financial aid and support for data collection for this research, which allowed one of the authors to immerse himself into their construction project for the entire CIMS implementation process. We would like to thank Will Senner for his contributions and guidance throughout the implementation and research.
References
Andresen, J., et al. (2000). “A framework for measuring IT innovation benefits.” ITcon, 5(1), 57–72.
Becerik-Gerber, B., and Rice, S. (2010). “The perceived value of building information modeling in the U.S. building industry.” ITcon, 15, 185–201.
Biggs, M. (2000). “Technology won’t end project failures; communication is key.” InfoWorld, 22(5), 70–72.
Construct IT. (1998). Measuring the benefits of IT innovation, Construct IT Centre of Excellence, Salford.
Fayek, A., Dissanayake, M., and Campero, O. (2004). “Developing a standard methodology for measuring and classifying construction field rework.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 31(6), 1077–1089.
Helms, M. (2006).“Effectiveness and efficiency.” 〈http://www.enotes.com/management-encyclopedia/effectiveness-efficiency〉 (Jul. 25, 2011).
Jang, W., and Skibniewski, M. (2009). “Cost-benefit analysis of embedded sensor system for construction materials tracking.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(5), 378–386.
Jaselskis, E., Ruwanpura, J., Becker, T., Silva, L., Jewell, P., and Floyd, E. (2010). “Innovation in construction engineering education using two applications of Internet-based information technology to provide real-time project observations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 110(3), 311–323.
Liberatore, M., Pollack-Johnson, B., and Smith, C. (2001). “Project management in construction: Software use and research directions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127(2), 101–107.
Lim, J. N., Schultmann, F., and Ofori, G. (2010). “Tailoring competitive advantages derived from innovation to the needs of construction firms.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 136(5), 568–580.
Marsh, L., and Flanagan, R. (2000). “Measuring the costs and benefits of information technology in construction.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 7(4), 423–435.
Meredith, J. (1998). “Building operations management theory through case and field research.” J. Oper. Manage., 16(4), 441–454.
Nuntasunti, S., and Bernold, L. (2006). “Experimental assessment of wireless construction technologies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(9), 1009–1018.
Robinson, P. M. (1977). “The Construction and Estimation of Continuous Time Models and Discrete Approximation in Econometrics.” J. Econometrics, 6(2), 173–197.
Scanlin, J. (1998). “The Internet as an enabler of the Bell Atlantic project office.” Project Manage. J., 29(2), 6–7.
Vela Systems [Computer software]. Vela Systems, Inc., Burlington, MA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 139 • Issue 4 • April 2013
Pages: 445 - 455
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 14, 2011
Accepted: May 21, 2012
Published online: May 25, 2012
Published in print: Apr 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.