TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 2, 2010

Effects of Contractors’ Risk Attitude on Competition in Construction

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 137, Issue 4

Abstract

Competitive bidding is the major mechanism of competition. Bidding is risky because the actual cost of the job is unknown. Thus, the bid should be high enough to make a profit but low enough to win the bidding. The result of competition depends on the competitor’s risk-taking behaviors, which are affected by the organization’s risk attitudes. A contractor’s risk-taking is an essential element of the construction business. The current study explores the domain of competition at the aggregate market level. An evolutionary simulation model was developed to investigate the effects of risk attitude on a contractor’s success and on the market structure. The analysis accounts for different risk-taking behaviors in competition, different performances by contractors, corresponding organizational changes, and aggregate patterns in the form of the market structure. The study finds that risk attitude is a competitive characteristic of contractors. The results provide new insight on competition in the market place, and explanations are given for a contractor’s competitive success.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers express their appreciation to the J.L. “Corky” Frank/Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC Chair in Engineering Project Management at Texas A&M University for partial support of this research.

References

Barney, J. B. (1986). “Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?” Acad. Manage. Rev., 11(3), 656–665.
Besanko, D., Dranove, D., Shanley, M., and Schaefer, S. (1996). Economics of strategy, Wiley, New York.
Bowman, E. H. (1980). “A risk/return paradox for strategic management.” Sloan Manage. Rev. Bank Mark., 21(3), 17–31.
Cagno, E., Caron, F., and Perego, A. (2001). “Multi-criteria assessment of the probability of winning in the competitive bidding process.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 19(6), 313–324.
Calori, R., and Sarnin, P. (1991). “Corporate culture and economic performance: A French study.” Organ. Stud., 12(1), 49–74.
Carbone, C., and Gittleman, J. L. (2002). “A common rule for the scaling of carnivore density.” Science, 295(5563), 2273–2274.
Chatman, J. A., and Jehn, K. A. (1994). “Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: How different can you be?.” Acad. Manage. J., 37(3), 522–553.
Chen, Y. K. (1991). “An analysis of decision strategy as applied to construction portfolios.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.
Christodoulou, S. E. (1998). “Optimum bid markup calculation in competitive bidding environments using fuzzy artificial neutral networks.” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia Univ., New York.
Dozzi, S. P., AbouRizk, S. M., and Schroeder, S. L. (1996). “Utility-theory model for bid market decisions.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 122(2), 119–124.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (1995). The top 400 contractors, 234(20), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 46–61.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (1996). The top 400 contractors, 236(20), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 48–65.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (1997). The top 400 contractors, 238(21), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 64–81.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (1998). The top 400 contractors, 240(21), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 65–80.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (1999). The top 400 contractors, 242(21), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 79–96.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (2000). The top 400 contractors, 244(20), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 95–115.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (2001). The top 400 contractors, 246(20), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 73–89.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (2002). The top 400 contractors, 248(19), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 63–76.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (2003). The top 400 contractors, 250(19), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 85–101.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (2004). The top 400 contractors, 252(20), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 44–62.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (2005). The top 400 contractors, 254(19), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 34–48.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (2006). The top 400 contractors, 256(20), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 60–75.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (2007). The top 400 contractors, 258(19), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 58–73.
Engineering News-Record (ENR). (2008). The top 400 contractors, 260(17), McGraw Hill Construction, New York, 60–75.
Erwin, D. H., and Krakauer, D. C. (2004). “Insights into innovation.” Science, 304(5674), 1117–1119.
Fiegenbaum, A., and Thomas, H. (1988). “Attitudes toward risk and the risk-return paradox: prospective theory explanations.” Acad. Manage. J., 31(1), 85–106.
Friedman, L. (1956). “A competitive-bidding strategy.” Oper. Res., 4(1), 104–112.
Hillson, D., and Murray-Webster, R. (2005). Understanding and managing risk attitude, Gower Publishing, Burlington, VT.
Jovanovic, B. (1982). “Selection and the evolution of industry.” Econometrica, 50(3), 649–670.
Kandori, M., Mailath, G. J., and Rob, R. (1993). “Learning, mutation, and long run equilibria in games.” Econometrica, 61(1), 29–56.
Kim, H. J. (2009). “The effects of risk attitude on competitive success in the construction industry.” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Kim, H. J., and Reinschmidt, K. F. (2006). “A dynamic competition model for construction contractors.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 24(9), 955–965.
Kwaśnicki, W. (1998). “Skewed distribution of firm sizes—an evolutionary perspective.” Struct. Change Econ. Dyn., 9(1), 135–158.
Levinthal, D. A. (1991). “Organizational adaptation and environmental selection—interrelated processes of change.” Organ. Sci., 2(1), 140–145.
Marquet, P. A. (2002). “Of predators, prey, and power laws.” Science, 295(5563), 2229–2230.
Marzouk, M., and Moselhi, O. (2003). “A decision support tool for construction bidding.” Constr. Innov., 3(2), 111–124.
Mayo, R. E. (1992). “Improved optimum bid markup estimation though workload related bid distribution functions.” Ph.D. thesis, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.
Metcalfe, S., and Foster, J. (2004). Evolution and economic complexity, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA.
Mochtar, K., and Arditi, D. (2001). “Pricing strategy in the U.S. construction industry.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 19(4), 405–415.
Moselhi, O., Hegazy, T., and Fazio, P. (1993). “DBID: Analogy-based DSS for bidding in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119(3), 466–479.
Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (1977). “Simulation of Schumpeterian competition.” Am. Econ. Rev., 67(1), 271–276.
Pennings, J. M. E., and Smidts, A. (2003). “The shape of utility functions and organizational behavior.” Manage. Sci., 49(9), 1251–1263.
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership, 3rd Ed., Jossey-Bass, Wiley, San Francisco.
Shash, A. A. (1995). “Competitive bidding system.” Cost Eng., 37(2), 19–20.
Simon, H. A., and Bonini, C. P. (1958). “The size distribution of business firms.” Am. Econ. Rev., 48(4), 607–617.
Singh, J. V. (1990). Organizational evolution: New directions, SAGE Publication, Newbury Park, CA.
Skitmore, M., and Pemberton, J. (1994). “A multivariate approach to construction contract bidding mark-up strategies.” J. Oper. Res. Soc., 45(11), 1263–1272.
Sørensen, J. B. (2002). “The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance.” Admin. Sci. Q., 47(1), 70–91.
Sounderpandian, J. (2007). “Evolutionary analysis of risk attitudes in competitive bidding environments using simulation.” Uncertainty and risk: Mental, formal, and experimental representations, M. Abdellaoui, R. D. Luce, M. J. Machina, and B. Munier, eds., Springer, Berlin, 275–290.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2002). “2002 Economic Census.” 〈http://www.census.gov〉 (Oct. 1, 2009).
Viner, J. (1932). “Cost curves and supply curves.” J. Econ. Bus., 3(1), 23–46.
von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Walls, M. R., and Dyer, J. (1996). “Risk propensity and firm performance: A study of the petroleum exploration industry.” Manage. Sci., 42(7), 1004–1021.
White, C. R., and Seymour, R. S. (2005). “Allometric scaling of mammalian metabolism.” J. Exp. Biol., 208(9), 1611–1619.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 137Issue 4April 2011
Pages: 275 - 283

History

Received: Oct 5, 2009
Accepted: Aug 23, 2010
Published online: Sep 2, 2010
Published in print: Apr 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hyung-Jin Kim [email protected]
Senior Researcher, Dept. of Research and Development, Kunwon Engineering Co. Ltd., Seoul 135-010, Korea (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Kenneth F. Reinschmidt [email protected]
J. L. “Corky” Frank/Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC Chair in Engineering Project Management and Professor, Zachry Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share