CASE STUDIES
Aug 23, 2010

Analysis of Factors Influencing Productivity Using Craftsmen Questionnaires: Case Study in a Chilean Construction Company

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 137, Issue 4

Abstract

Improvement of productivity in construction has been a major industry challenge, given its high impact on project results. It has received increased attention from construction researchers promoting different enhancement actions, since analyzing factors affecting labor productivity is an instrumental part in this process. This paper focuses on identifying and understanding the productivity factors affecting projects in a Chilean construction company on the basis of questionnaires administered to both direct workers and midlevel employees. Analysis of the questionnaire results helped to determine organizational and managerial weaknesses and facilitated comparison of the findings with previous productivity studies. The results proved to be useful in developing recommendations for productivity improvements. The main findings indicate that the critical areas affecting construction productivity were related to materials, tools, rework, equipment, truck availability, and the workers’ motivational dynamics. These results are similar to those obtained in previous studies in the United States and in Chile. Salary expectations were found to be the main reason for turnover in the studied company, which was an aspect not mentioned in previous studies. Finally, additional analyses seem to show that some factors affecting productivity are common to construction projects across boundaries, therefore validating data aggregation and the possibility of learning from experiences in different locations and even separated in time of occurrence.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers gratefully acknowledge the important contributions to this research provided by Carlos Solis, Senior Manager at Incolur, Chile (www.incolur.cl). The same recognition is extended to the workers and project managers (Mr. Gonzolo Gomez and Mr. Oscar Portugal) of the three projects involved in this study. Finally, to the company, which generously supports such initiatives as it strives for excellence and continuous improvement.

References

Abdul Kadir, M. R., Lee, W. P., Jaafar, M. S., Sapuan, S. M., and Ali, A. A. A. (2005). “Factors affecting construction labour productivity for Malaysian residential projects.” Struct. Surv., 23(1), 42–54.
Alarcón, L. F., and Calderón, R. (2003). “Implementing lean production strategies in construction companies.” Proc., Construction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation of Construction, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Alarcón, L. F., Diethelm, S., Rojo, O., and Calderón, R. (2008). “Assessing the impacts of implementing lean construction.” Rev. Ing. Constr., 23(1), 26–33.
Borcherding, J. D., and Alarcón, L. F. (1991). “Quantitative effects on construction productivity.” Constr. Lawyer (Am. Bar Assoc.), 11(1), 36–48.
Borcherding, J. D., Palmeter, S. B., and Jansma, G. L. (1986). “Work force management programs for increased productivity and quality work.” EEI Construction Committee Spring Meeting, 4–9.
Christian, J., and Hachey, D. (1995). “Effects of delay times on production rates in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 121(1), 20–26.
Contractors Consultant Corporation. (1981). “The productivity survey.” Island Park, NY.
Dai, J., Goodrum, P. M., and Maloney, W. F. (2009). “Construction craft workers’ perceptions of the factors affecting their productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(3), 217–226.
Edmondson, C. H. (1974). “You can predict construction labor productivity.” Hydrocarbon Process., 53, 167–180.
Garner, D. F., Borcherding, J. D., and Samelson, N. M. (1979). “Factors influencing the motivation and productivity of craftsmen and foremen on large construction projects.” U.S. Dept. of Energy (DOE), Contract EQ-78-G-01-6333, Vol. II, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
González, V., Alarcón, L. F., and Mundaca, F. (2008a). “Investigating the relationship between planning reliability and project performance.” Prod. Plann. Control, 19(5), 461–474.
Grillo, A., Muñoz, R., García, F., and Herrera, R. (2003). “Indicadores de Desempeño Sectorial y Línea Base 2002.” Bit, la Revista Técnica de la Construcción, 10(31) 22–25.
Gunduz, M. (2004). “A quantitative approach for evaluation of negative impact of overmanning on electrical and mechanical projects.” Build. Environ., 39, 581–587.
Halligan, D. W., Demsetz, L. A., Brown, J. D., and Pace, C. B. (1994). “Action-response models and loss of productivity in construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 120(1), 47–64.
Hanna, A. S. (2001). “Quantifying the impact of change orders on electrical and mechanical labor productivity.” Research Rep. No. 158-11, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
Hanna, A. S., Chang, C. K., Lackney, J. A., and Sullivan, K. T. (2007). “Impact of overmanning on mechanical and sheet metal labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(1), 22–28.
Hanna, A. S., Chang, C. K., Sullivan, K. T., and Lackney, J. A. (2008). “Impact of shift work on labor productivity for labor intensive contractor.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 134(3), 197–204.
Hanna, A. S., Russell, J. S., and Vandenberg, P. J. (1999). “The impact of change orders on mechanical construction labour efficiency.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 17(6), 721–730.
Hanna, A. S., Taylor, C. S., and Sullivan, K. T. (2005). “Impact of extended overtime on construction labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(6), 734–739.
Harmon, K. M., and Cole, B. (2006). “Loss of productivity studies–Current uses and misuses.” Constr. Briefs., 8(1), 1–19.
Ibbs, W. (2005). “Impact of change’s timing on labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(11), 1219–1223.
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE). (2007). “Macroeconomía del Empleo.” 〈www.ine.cl/canales/menu/boletines/enfoques/2007/pdf/macroeconomia.pdf〉 (Jan. 10, 2010).
Jansma, G. L. (1987). “A methodology for making construction productivity comparisons.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Liu, M., and Ballard, G. (2008). “Improving labor productivity through production control.” Proc., 11th Annual Conf. of Int. Group for Lean Construction, Manchester, UK.
Mechanical Contractors Association of America (MCA). (1976). “Outline of standards for change orders in the construction industry.” Rockville, MD.
National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA). (1974). “The effect of temperature on productivity.” Rep. No. 5072, Washington, DC.
Neil, J. M., and Knack, L. E. (1984). “Predicting productivity.” AACE Trans., Paper U-3, Transaction American Association of Cost Engineers (AACE), Morgantown, WV.
O’Connor, L. V. (1969). “Overcoming the problems of construction scheduling on large central station boilers.” Proc., American Power Conf., 31, 518–528, Chicago.
Ramírez, R. R., Alarcón, L. F., and Knights, P. (2004). “Benchmarking system for evaluating management practices in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng., 20(3), 110–117.
Rojas, E. M., and Aramvareekul, P. (2003). “Labor productivity drivers and opportunities in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng., 19(2), 78–82.
Sonmez, R., and Rowings, J. E. (1998). “Construction labor productivity modeling with neural networks.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(6), 498–504.
Thomas, H. R. (2000). “Principles of construction labor productivity measurement and processing.” Research Rep. No 2K14, Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, University Park, PA.
Thomas, H. R., and Jansma, G. L. (1985). “Quantifying construction productivity losses associated with and accelerated schedule.” Final rep. prepared for Burns and Roe, Oradell, NJ.
Thomas, H. R., Riley, D. R., and Sanvido, V. E. (1999). “Loss of labor productivity due to delivery methods and weather.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(1), 39–46.
Thomas, H. R., Riley, D. R., and Sinha, S. K. (2006). “Fundamental principles for avoiding congested work areas—A case study.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 11(4), 197–205.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research, design and methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 137Issue 4April 2011
Pages: 312 - 320

History

Received: Aug 4, 2009
Accepted: Aug 3, 2010
Published online: Aug 23, 2010
Published in print: Apr 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rodrigo A. Rivas [email protected]
M.Sc.E., Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C1752, Austin, TX 78712-0273; and Civil Engineer, M.S. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
John D. Borcherding, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station C1752, Austin, TX 78712-0273. E-mail: [email protected]
Vicente González, Ph.D. [email protected]
Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Faculty of Engineering, The Univ. of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Courier Address: 3 Grafton Rd., Auckland 1142, New Zealand, 3737462. E-mail: [email protected]
Luis F. Alarcón, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Head and Professor, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 306, Correo 22, Santiago, Chile. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share