Below-Average Bidding Method
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 9
Abstract
The low-bid method, typically used for competitive bidding in the United States, may result in a contract with a firm that submits either accidentally or deliberately an unrealistically low-bid price. Such an occurrence hurts both the owner and the contractor by promoting disputes, increased costs, and schedule delays. To address this problem, other countries have adopted bidding methods based on the average of the bids submitted. One such approach is the below-average method where the winning bid is closest to but below the average of all bids. A competitive bidding model for the below-average-bid method is presented and its merits relative to the average-bid method and the low-bid method are explored. The below-average-bid process is investigated analytically and through Monte Carlo simulation. The results of bidding models for the below-average, the average, and the low-bid methods are presented in four easy-to-use nomograms which allow contractors to determine the optimal lump-sum bid price for each method without the need for complicated analysis. A comparison of the three methods provides information and insights to help owners with the difficult choice of a suitable bidding method for the project at hand.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (2001). Primer on contracting for the twenty-first century, 4th Ed., Report of the Contract Administration Task Force of the AASHTO Subcommittee on Construction, Washington, D.C.
ASCE. (1998). “Low bid gives way to mid-bid.” Civ. Eng. Mag., April.
Florida DOT. (2000). “Highway construction and engineering and transportation system maintenance programs.” Rep. No. 99-29, Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability, Tallahassee, Fla., Chap. 4.
Friedman, L. (1956). “A competitive bidding strategy.” Oper. Res., 4, 104–112.
Grogan, T. (1992). “Low bids raise hidden costs.” ENR, 228(13), 30–31.
Henriod, E., and Lantran, J. -M. (2000). “Trends in contracting practice for civil works.” World Bank, ⟨www.worldbank.org⟩ (May 31, 2010).
Ioannou, P. G. (1988). “Bidding models—Symmetry and state of information.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 114(2), 214–232.
Ioannou, P. G., and Leu, S. S. (1993). “Average-bid method—Competitive bidding strategy.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119(1), 131–147.
Rothkopf, M. H. (2007). “Decision analysis: The right tool for auctions.” Decision Analysis, INFORMS, 04(3), 167–172.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 30, 2009
Accepted: Jan 29, 2010
Published online: Feb 8, 2010
Published in print: Sep 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.