TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jan 28, 2010

Piloting Evaluation Metrics for Sustainable High-Performance Building Project Delivery

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 8

Abstract

Sustainable high-performance buildings are being more widely adopted around the world to reduce energy costs and improve the well being of occupants. To achieve the set goals for these building projects within realistic financial and time constraints, superior planning, design, and construction processes are needed. The available literature lacks the descriptive project delivery metrics identifying scientific methods for providing insight or feedback about the performance of project delivery processes for sustainable high-performance buildings. This paper describes an exploratory study examining more than 100 variables in green project delivery to scientifically identify important metrics. Limited by a rather small sample due to the relatively young market of green buildings, the outcome of this paper, nevertheless, provides important direction for the continued development of meaningful metrics to assist in the establishment of a decision making support tool for project teams to facilitate optimum project delivery processes for sustainable high-performance buildings.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to thank all the industry members that contributed to this research, specifically the vice president and employees of Davis Construction and the members of Partnership for Achieving Construction Excellence (PACE) at Penn State for their invaluable time and feedback to this research.

References

The American Institute of Architects (AIA). (2009). “Integrated project delivery: A guide.” ⟨http://www.aia.org/contractdocs/AIAS077630⟩ (May 16, 2009).
Beheiry, S. M. A., Chong, W. K., and Haas, C. T. (2006). “Examining the business impact of owner commitment to sustainability.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(4), 384–392.
Bennett, J., Pothecary, E., and Robinson, G. (1996). Designing and building a world class industry, University of Reading, Reading, U.K.
Chan, A. P. C., Scott, D., and Lam, E. W. M. (2002). “Framework of success criteria for design-build projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 18(3), 120–128.
DOE. (2006). “High performance green project database.” ⟨http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/highperformance⟩ (Oct. 18, 2006).
El Wardani, M., Messner, J. I., and Horman, M. J. (2006). “Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(3), 230–238.
Fowler, K. M., Solana, A. E., and Spees, K. (2005). Building cost and performance metrics: Data collection protocol, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Wash.
Garcia-Berthou, E. (2001). “On the misuse of residuals in ecology: Testing regression residuals vs. the analysis of covariance.” J. Anim. Ecol., 70, 708–711.
General Services Administration (GSA). (2004). LEED Cost Study: Final Report, Washington, D.C.
Green Globes. (2009). “Case studies.” ⟨http://www.greenglobes.com/⟩ (May 16, 2009).
Horman, M. J., et al. (2006). “Delivering green buildings: Process improvements for sustainable construction.” Journal of Green Bldg., 1(1), 123–140.
Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., and Perlman, J. (2003). “The costs and financial benefits of green buildings.” Rep. Prepared for California’s Sustainable Building Task Force, California's Sustainable Building Task Force, Sacramento, Calif.
Konchar, M., and Sanvido, V. (1998). “Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(6), 435–444.
Korkmaz, S. (2007). “Piloting evaluation metrics for high performance green building project delivery.” Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
Korkmaz, S., Riley, D., and Horman, M. (2007). “Effective indicators for high performance green building delivery.” Proc., ASCE-CIB Proc. of the 2007 Construction Research Congress, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Kuehl, R. (2000). Design of experiments: Statistical principles of research design and analysis, 2nd Ed., Duxbury, United States.
Lapinski, A. R. (2005). “Delivering sustainability: Mapping Toyota motor sales corporate facility delivery process.” MS thesis, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
Lapinski, A. R., Horman, M. J., and Riley, D. R. (2006). “Lean processes for sustainable project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(10), 1083–1091.
Ling, F. Y. Y., Chan, S. L., Chong, E., and Ee, L. P. (2004). “Predicting performance of design-build and design-bid-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 130(1), 75–83.
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (MCH). (2007). McGraw-Hill Construction Education Green Building Smartmarket Report, New York.
Molenaar, K. R., and Gransberg, D. D. (2001). “Design-builder selection for small highway projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 17(4), 214–223.
Molenaar, K. R., and Songer, A. D. (1998). “Model for public sector design-build project selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 124(6), 467–479.
Molenaar, K. R., Songer, A. D., and Barash, M. (1999). “Public sector design-build evolution and performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 15(2), 54–62.
Riley, D., and Horman, M. (2005). “Delivering green buildings: High performance processes for high performance projects.” Proc., Engineering Sustainability 2005: Conf. of the Mascaro Sustainability Initiative.
Riley, D., Magent, C., and Horman, M. (2004). “Sustainable metrics: A design process model for high performance buildings.” Proc., CIB World Building Congress.
Smith, A. (2003). “Building momentum: National trends and prospects for high performance green buildings.” Rep. Prepared for the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Green Building Council, Washington, D.C.
Thomas, S. R., Macken, C. L., Chung, T. H., and Kim, I. (2002). Measuring the impacts of the delivery system on project performance-design-build and design-bid-build, NIST, Austin, Tex.
U.S. EPA. (2006). “Energy star rating system.” ⟨http://www.epa.gov⟩ (Oct. 18, 2006).
U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). (2009). “U.S. Green Building Council.” ⟨http://www.usgbc.org/⟩ (May 16, 2009).
Whole building design guide (WBDG). (2009). “Whole building design guide.” ⟨http://www.wbdg.org/⟩ (May 16, 2009).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136Issue 8August 2010
Pages: 877 - 885

History

Received: Nov 30, 2008
Accepted: Jan 16, 2010
Published online: Jan 28, 2010
Published in print: Aug 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sinem Korkmaz [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Planning, Design, and Construction, Michigan State Univ., 201D Human Ecology Building, East Lansing, MI 48824 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
David Riley [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State Univ., 104 Engr. Unit A, University Park, PA 16802. E-mail: [email protected]
Michael Horman
Deceased September 15, 2009; formerly, Associate Professor, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State Univ., 104 Engr. Unit A, University Park, PA 16802.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share