Dynamic Knowledge-Based Process Integration Portal for Collaborative Construction
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136, Issue 3
Abstract
There is a need to support collaborative coordinated construction through the integration of work processes across various stakeholders, disciplines, and projects. Due to the fast-growing complexities of domain-wide coordination and collaboration, coupled with the emerging opportunities of knowledge sharing, a knowledge-based approach is believed to be the way to go. Knowledge-based process integration takes into account explicit and formal semantics (meaning) of processes. It aims at supporting seamless integration of knowledge-carrying processes. This paper presents a prototype collaborative portal for domain-wide process integration. The portal is ontology-based: semantic process representation is enabled through ontologies, and knowledge-based process integration is facilitated through an ontology merger. The portal aims at offering an efficient value-adding collaboration platform through multidimensional process integration for producing a common workflow that goes beyond listing of processes to a knowledge-enabled view. The prototype was evaluated through a focus group.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Anumba, C. J. (2000). “Integrated systems for construction: challenges for the millennium.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Construction Information Technology (INCITE 2000), Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Hong Kong, China, 78–92.
Chinowsky, P. S., and Rojas, E. M. (2003). “Virtual teams: guide to successful implementation.” J. Manage. Eng., 19(3), 98–106.
Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2006). “CII strategic plan 2002–2004.” ⟨http://www.construction-institute.org/newsletter/pdfblackfinalstratplan.pdf⟩ (Dec. 30, 2006).
Edmunds, H. (1999). The focus group research handbook, NTC Business Books, Chicago.
El-Gohary, N. (2008). “Semantic process modelling and integration for collaborative construction and infrastructure development.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Toronto, Canada.
El-Gohary, N., and El-Diraby, T. (2010a). “A domain ontology for processes in infrastructure and construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. (to be published).
El-Gohary, N., and El-Diraby, T. (2010b). “Merging architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) ontologies.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. (to be published).
Fabiano, P. M., and Lederman, L. C. (2002). “Top ten misperceptions of focus group research.” Working paper # 3: The report on social norms, PaperClip Communications, Garfield, N.J.
Gruber, T. R. (1995). “Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing.” Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 43, 907–928.
Halpin, D. W. (1993). “Process-based research to meet the international challenge.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119(3), 415–425.
Kazi, A. S., and Charoenngam, C. (2003). “Facilitating inter-enterprise information exchange in one-of-a-kind settings.” Electron J. Inf. Technol. Constr., 8, 319–340.
Kontio, J., Lehtola, L., and Bragge, J. (2004). “Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences.” Proc., 2004 Int. Symp. on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE’04), IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 271–280.
Lindfors, C. T. (2001). “Process orientation: an approach for organisations to function effectively.” Proc., 9th Int. Group for Lean Construction Conf. (IGLC 9), National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore.
Lu, H., and Issa, R. R. A. (2005). “Extended production integration for construction: a loosely coupled project model for building construction.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 19(1), 58–68.
Prudhomme, L. (1999). “CII—The vision and plan.” Proc., CIPP Workshop, Stanford University—National Science Foundation, Stanford, Calif.
Quirchmayr, G., and Tagg, R. (2002). “An architectural concept for knowledge integration in inter-administration computing.” Proc., 3rd Int. Workshop on Knowledge Management in e-Government, IFIP 2002 Conf., Int. Federation for Information Processing (IFIP), Laxenburg, Austria, 67–77.
Rezgui, Y., Cooper, G., and Brandon, P. (1998). “Information management in a collaborative multiactor environment: The Commit approach.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 12(3), 136–144.
Taivalsaari, A. (1996). Classes vs. prototypes: Some, philosophical and historical observations, Nokia Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Toronto Transit Commission. (2006). “St. Clair streetcar project: Budget update: November 28, 2005.” Rep. No. 7A, ⟨http://www.ttc.ca/postings/gso-comrpt/documents/report/f2619/_conv.htm⟩ (Jan. 05, 2006).
Wilson, I., Harvey, S., Vankeisbelck, R., and Samad, A. (2001). “Enabling the construction virtual enterprise: the Osmos approach.” Electron J. Inf. Technol. Constr., 6, 83–110.
Zhang, N., and Tiong, R. (2003). “Integrated electronic commerce model for the construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(5), 578–585.
Ziegler, P., and Dittrich, K. R. (2004). “Three decades of data integration—all problems solved?” Proc., 18th IFIP World Computer Congress (WCC 2004), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 3–12.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 136 • Issue 3 • March 2010
Pages: 316 - 328
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 24, 2008
Accepted: Sep 2, 2009
Published online: Sep 3, 2009
Published in print: Mar 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.