TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 9, 2009

Whole Life Performance Assessment: Critical Success Factors

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135, Issue 11

Abstract

Whole life costing (WLC) has become the best practice in construction procurement and it is likely to be a major issue in predicting whole life costs of a construction project accurately. However, different expectations from different organizations throughout a project’s life and the lack of data, monitoring targets, and long-term interest for many key players are obstacles to be overcome if WLC is to be implemented. A questionnaire survey was undertaken to investigate a set of ten common factors and 188 individual factors. These were grouped into eight critical categories (project scope, time, cost, quality, contract/administration, human resource, risk, and health and safety) by project phase, as perceived by the clients, contractors and subcontractors in order to identify critical success factors for whole life performance assessment (WLPA). Using a relative importance index, the top ten critical factors for each category, from the perspective of project participants, were analyzed and ranked. Their agreement on those categories and factors were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation. All participants identify “Type of Project” as the most common critical factor in the eight categories for WLPA. Using the relative index ranking technique and weighted average methods, it was found that the most critical individual factors in each category were: “clarity of contract” (scope); “fixed construction period” (time); “precise project budget estimate” (cost); “material quality” (quality); “mutual/trusting relationships” (contract/administration); “leadership/team management” (human resource); and “management of work safety on site” (health and safety). There was relatively a high agreement on these categories among all participants. Obviously, with 80 critical factors of WLPA, there is a stronger positive relationship between client and contactor rather than contractor and subcontractor, client and subcontractor. Putting these critical factors into a criteria matrix can facilitate an initial framework of WLPA in order to aid decision making in the public sector in South Korea for evaluation/selection process of a construction project at the bid stage.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Al-Hajj, A. A. G. (1999). “The development of an integrated life cycle costing model using object oriented and VR technologies.” Proc., Information Technology in Construction: CIB W78 Workshop Durability of Building Materials and Components, M. A. Lacasse and D. J. P. O. Vanier, eds., National Research Council of Canada, Vancouver, B.C., 2901–2908.
Assaf, S. A., Al-Khalil, M., and Al-Hazmi, M. (1995). “Causes of delay in large building construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 11(2), 45.
Bartlett, E., Waterman, A., and Bourke, K. (2001). “Providing whole life cost data—Meeting client demands for long term value for money in built assets.” Proc., CIB World Building Congress 2001, CIB WBC, Wellington, New Zealand, Paper No. 10, 1–9.
Bartlett, E. V., and Clift, M. (1999). “Reliability and whole life performance: Integrating the supply chain.” Proc., Durability of Building Materials and Components, 8th, NRC Research, Vancouver, 1916–1923.
Bourke, K., and Davies, H. (1999). “Estimating service lives using the factor method for use in whole life costing.” Proc., Durability of Building Materials and Components, 8th, NRC Research, Vancouver, 1518–1526.
Caralli, R. A. (2004). The critical success factor method: Establishing a foundation for enterprise security management, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh.
Chan, D. W. M., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (1996). “An evaluation of construction time performance in the building industry.” Build. Environ., 31(6), 569–578.
Chan, E. H. W., and Au, M. C. Y. (2009). “Factors influencing building contractors’ pricing for time-related risks in tenders.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(3), 135–145.
Chinyio, E. A., Olomolaiye, P. O., Kometa, S. T., and Harris, F. C. (1998). “A needs-based methodology for classifying construction clients and selecting contractors.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 16(1), 91–98.
CIOB. (2002). Code of practice for project management for constucion and developement, Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.
Clift, M., and Bourke, K. (1999). Study on whole life costing, BRE Centre for Whole Life Performance, U.K.
Creedy, G. (2006). “Client risk factors leading to cost over-run in highway projects.” Second International Conference of the CRC for Construction Innovation, 12-14 March 2006, Gold Coast, Australia, 1–14.
Dai, J., Goodrum, P. M., and Maloney, W. F. (2007). “Analysis of craft workers’ and foremen’s perceptions of the factors affecting construction labour productivity.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 25(11), 1139–1152.
Dobbins, J. (2002). “Critical success factor (CSF) analysis for DoD risk management.” Program manager: the Defense Systems Management College newsletter, 31, Part 3 (2002): 40–45.
Egan, J., Great Britain Construction Task Force, and Great Britain Dept. of the Environment Transport and the Regions. (1998). Rethinking Construction: The Report of the Construction Task Force to the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, on the Scope for Improving the Quality and Efficiency of UK Construction, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
El Wardani, M. A., Messner, J. I., and Horman, M. J. (2006). “Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(3), 230–238.
Flanagan, R. (2002). “Managing risk for an uncertain future—A project management perspective.” Proc., Project Management—Impresario of the Construction Industry Symp., Research Centre for Construction and Real Estate Economics, Hong Kong, 22–32.
Flanagan, R., Jewell, C., and Norman, G. (2005). Whole life appraisal for construction, Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
Hewitt, R. A. (1985). The procurement of building: Proposals to improve the performance of the industry, College of Estate Management, Reading, Berkshire, U.K.
Hunter, K., Kelly, J., and Trufil, G. (2006). “Whole life costing of sustainable design,” CIB W092 symposium on sustainability and value through construction procurement, Salford Quays, U.K.
Kamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J., and Evbuomwan, N. F. O. (2002). Capturing client requirements in construction projects, Thomas Telford, London.
Karna, S. (2004). “Analysing cutomer satisfaction and quality in construction-the case of public and private customers.” Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 2, 67–80.
Kartam, N. A., and Kartam, S. A. (2001). “Risk and its management in the Kuwaiti construction industry: A contractors’ perspective.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 19, 325–335.
Khosrowshahi, F., and Alani, A. M. (2003). “A model for smoothing time-series data in construction.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 21(5), 483–494.
Kirkham, R. (2005). “Re-engineering the whole life cycle costing process.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 23(1), 9–14.
Kometa, S. T., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Harris, F. C. (1995). “An evaluation of clients’ needs and responsibilities in the construction process.” Eng., Constr., Archit. Manage., 2(1), 57–76.
Korean National Statistics Office. (2008). Korea statistics yearbook, National Statistics Office, Seoul.
Lee, S., and Lee, S. (2006). A study on the introduction of best value selection, Construction and Economy Research Institute of Korea, Seoul.
Lee, Y. -k., Kang, L. -S., Kim, C. -H., and Park, J. -H. (2006). “Analysis of present ordering condition of turn-key contract for civil engineering projects.” Proc., KSCE Conf. and Civil Expo, Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Seoul, 950–953.
Ling, F. Y. Y., Ibbs, C. W., and Hoo, W. Y. (2006). “Determinants of international architectural, engineering, and construction firms’ project success in China.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132, 206–214.
McPherson, M., and Nunes, M. B. (2006). “Topped by cross-winds, tugged at by sinuous undercurrents: E-learning organizational critical success factors as identified by HE practitioners.” Proc., ALT-C 2006 Research, Association for Learning Technology., U.K., 70–80.
Minami, K. (2004). “Whole life appraisal of the repair and improvement work costs of post office buildings in Japan.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 22(3), 311–318.
Ofori, G. (2000). “Greening the construction supply chain in Singapore.” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6, 195–206.
Ogunsemi, D. R., and Jagboro, G. O. (2006). “Time-cost model for building projects in Nigeria.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 24(3), 253–258.
Phua, F. T. T. (2004). “Modelling the determinants of multi-firm project success: A grounded exploration of differing participant perspectives.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 22, 451–459.
Project Management Institute. (2004). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK guide, 2004, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, Pa.
Rockhart, J. F. (1979). “Chief executives define their own data needs.” Harvard Bus. Rev., 57, 81–93.
Rowe, D. P. (1999). “Whole life performance strategy: Beyond incremental cost and service life.” Performance, service life prediction and sustainable construction Durability of building materials and components, Vol. 3, National Research Council of Canada, Vancouver, Canada, 1881–1892.
Russell, J. S., Jaselskis, E. J., and Lawrence, S. P. (1997). “Continuous assessment of project performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123(1), 64–71.
Shash, A. (1993). “Factors considered in tendering decisions by top UK contractors.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 11(2), 111–118.
Soetanto, R., and Proverbs, D. G. (2002). “Modelling the satisfaction of contractors: The impact of client performance.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 9(5–6), 453–465.
Sorrell, S. (2003). “Making the link: Climate policy and the reform of the UK construction industry.” Energy Policy, 31(9), 865–878.
Khoo, H. H., and Tan, K. C. (2002). “Critical success factors for quality management implementation in Russia.” Industrial and Commercial Training, 34(7), 263–268.
Tarawneh, S. A. (2004). “Evaluation of pre-qualification criteria: Client perspective; Jordan case study.” J. Appl. Sci., 4(3), 354–363.
Torp, O., Austeng, K., and Mengesha, W. J. (2004). “Critical success factors for project performance; a study from front-end assessments of large public projects in Norway.” Proc., Nordnet 2004 Conf., Concepts Reports, Norway, 1–5.
Yu, W. -D., and Lo, S. -S. (2005). “Time-dependent construction social costs model.” Constr. Manage. Econom., 23(3), 327–337.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 135Issue 11November 2009
Pages: 1146 - 1161

History

Received: May 8, 2008
Accepted: May 7, 2009
Published online: May 9, 2009
Published in print: Nov 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sung Ho Park [email protected]
Ph.D. Research Student, School of Construction Management and Engineering, Univ. of Reading, P.O. Box 219, Whiteknights, Reading, Berks RG6 6AW U.K. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share