Technical Papers
Dec 29, 2021

Seismic Performance Assessment of RC Buildings Reinforced with Plain Rebars

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 36, Issue 2

Abstract

The use of plain (smooth and undeformed) rebars as longitudinal and transverse reinforcement in RC members is one of the most encountered practices in old construction technology. Thus, probable vulnerabilities due to plain rebar implementation should be considered in the seismic evaluation of RC buildings. It is known that reduced bond stresses distributed along the plain rebar surface due to the absence of the ribs leads to a resultant reduction in effective stiffness and an increase in rotation capacities for RC members. Therefore, RC buildings that were constructed according to the older design codes using plain rebars were expected to deform laterally beyond the anticipated deformation capacities that were determined based only on the RC members reinforced with deformed rebars. In this study, the modeling strategies were examined and verified with the results from an existing building test in the literature, and then the seismic performance of a five-story RC framed building, which was reinforced with plain rebars, was evaluated under nonlinear time-history analysis (NTHA). In order for code comparison, the nonlinear characteristics of the RC members were determined according to the previously suggested model for members reinforced with plain rebars and the current Turkish earthquake code regulations. The parameters investigated were (1) the number of members at each damage state, (2) the maximum interstory drift ratios, and (3) the normalized story shears by building weight considering the earthquake type (pulse type or non-pulse type) and predamage effects. The analysis results emphasized the importance of rebar characteristics in seismic performance assessment, because the use of plain rebars reduced the number of plastic hinges while leading to higher drift ratios. This phenomenon is analogous to the behavior of RC beams reinforced with plain rebars which fail with a smaller number of wide cracks rather than a greater number of narrow cracks as in the case of deformed rebars.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Abrams, D. A. 1913. Test of bond between concrete and steel. Engineering Experiment Station, Bulletin No. 71. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois.
Adibi, M., M. S. Marefat, and R. Allahvirdizadeh. 2018. “Nonlinear modeling of cyclic response of RC beam–column joints reinforced by plain bars.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 16 (11): 5529–5556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0399-4.
Arani, K. K., M. Di Ludovico, M. S. Marefat, A. Prota, and G. Manfredi. 2014. “Lateral response evaluation of old type reinforced concrete columns with smooth bars.” ACI Struct. J. 111 (4): 827–838. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686734.
ASCE. 2017. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-17. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Bedirhanoğlu, I., A. İlki, S. Pujol, and N. Kumbasar. 2010. “Behavior of deficient joints with plain bars and low-strength concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 107 (3): 300–310. https://doi.org/10.14359/51663695.
Caprili, S., F. Mattei, R. Gigliotti, and W. Salvatore. 2018. “Modified cyclic steel law including bond-slip for analysis of RC structures with plain bars.” Earthquake Struct. 14 (3): 187–201. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.3.187.
Caruso, C., R. Bento, R. Sousa, and A. A. Correia. 2019. “Modelling strain penetration effects in RC walls with smooth steel bars.” Mag. Conc. Res. 71 (17): 894–906. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.18.00052.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2005. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Cömert, M., C. Demir, A. O. Ateş, K. Orakçal, and A. İlki. 2017. “Seismic performance of three-storey full-scale sub-standard reinforced concrete buildings.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 15 (8): 3293–3320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0023-4.
De Luca, F., G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2014. “Eurocode-based seismic assessment of modern heritage RC structures: The case of the Tower of the Nations in Naples (Italy).” Eng. Struct. 74 (Sep): 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.015.
Del Zoppo, M., M. Di Ludovico, and A. Prota. 2016. “Deformation capacity of non-conforming R.C. columns under compressive axial load and biaxial bending.” Eng. Struct. 124 (Oct): 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.019.
De Risi, M. T., and G. M. Verderame. 2017. “Experimental assessment and numerical modelling of exterior non-conforming beam-column joints with plain bars.” Eng. Struct. 150 (Nov): 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.039.
Di Ludovico, M., G. M. Verderame, A. Prota, G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza. 2013. “Experimental behavior of nonconforming RC columns with plain bars under constant axial load and biaxial bending.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (6): 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000703.
Di Sarno, L., C. Del Vecchio, G. Maddaloni, and A. Prota. 2017. “Experimental response of an existing RC bridge with smooth bars and preliminary numerical simulations.” Eng. Struct. 136 (Apr): 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.052.
Fabbrocino, G., G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2005. “Experimental behaviour of anchored smooth rebars in old type reinforced concrete buildings.” Eng. Struct. 27 (10): 1575–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.05.002.
Fabbrocino, G., G. M. Verderame, G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza. 2004. “Structural models of critical regions in old-type R.C. frames with smooth rebars.” Eng. Struct. 26 (14): 2137–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.018.
Fabbrocino, G., G. M. Verderame, and M. Polese. 2007. “Probabilistic steel stress–crack width relationship in R.C. frames with smooth rebars.” Eng. Struct. 29 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.002.
Feldman, L. R., and F. M. Bartlett. 2007. “Bond stresses along plain steel reinforcing bars in pullout specimens.” ACI Struct. J. 104 (6): 685–692. https://doi.org/10.14359/18950.
Feldman, L. R., and F. M. Bartlett. 2008. “Bond in flexural members with plain steel reinforcement.” ACI Struct. J. 105 (5): 552–560. https://doi.org/10.14359/19938.
Fernandes, C., J. Melo, H. Varum, and A. Costa. 2011. “Cyclic behavior of a two-span RC beam built with plain reinforcing bars.” Period. Polytech. Civ. Eng. 55 (1): 21–29. https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.ci.2011-1.03.
Fernandes, C., J. Melo, H. Varum, and A. Costa. 2013a. “Cyclic behavior of substandard reinforced concrete beam-column joints with plain bars.” ACI Struct. J. 110 (1): 137–147. https://doi.org/10.14359/51684337.
Fernandes, C., H. Varum, and A. Costa. 2013b. “Importance of the bond–slip mechanism in the numerical simulation of the cyclic response of RC elements with plain reinforcing bars.” Eng. Struct. 56 (Nov): 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.013.
Göksu, C., H. Yılmaz, S. R. Chowdury, K. Orakçal, and A. İlki. 2014. “The effect of lap splice length on the cyclic lateral load behavior of RC members with low-strength concrete and plain bars.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 17 (5): 639–658. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.5.639.
Grammatikou, S., M. N. Fardis, and D. Biskinis. 2018. “Models of the flexure-controlled strength, stiffness and cyclic deformation capacity of rectangular RC columns with smooth bars, including lap-splicing and FRP jackets.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 16 (1): 341–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0202-y.
Hakuto, S., R. Park, and H. Tanaka. 1999. “Seismic load tests on interior and exterior beam-column joints with substandard reinforcing details.” ACI Struct. J. 97 (1): 11–25. https://doi.org/10.14359/829.
Mander, J. B., M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park. 1988. “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete.” J. Sci. Eng. 114 (8): 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
Marefat, M. S., K. K. Arani, S. M. H. Shirazi, and A. Amrollahi. 2008. “Seismic behavior and retrofit of concrete columns of old RC buildings reinforced with plain bars.” In Proc., AIP Conf. Proc., 1020–1554. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2963783.
Melo, J., C. Fernandes, H. Varum, H. Rodrigues, A. Costa, and A. Arede. 2011. “Numerical modelling of the cyclic behaviour of RC elements built with plain reinforcing bars.” Eng. Struct. 33 (2): 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.005.
Melo, J., H. Varum, and T. Rosetto. 2015. “Experimental cyclic behaviour of RC columns with plain bars and proposal for Eurocode 8 formula improvement.” Eng. Struct. 88 (Apr): 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.033.
Metelli, G., F. Messali, C. Beschi, and P. Riva. 2015. “A model for beam–column corner joints of existing RC frame subjected to cyclic loading.” Eng. Struct. 89 (Apr): 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.038.
Ministry of Public Works and Settlement. 2018. Turkish building earthquake code. TEC-18. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of Public Works and Settlement.
Opobola, E. A., K. J. Elwood, and S. Oliver. 2019. “Deformation capacity of reinforced concrete columns with smooth reinforcement.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (5): 2032–2509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00540-w.
O’Reilly, G. J., and T. J. Sullivan. 2019. “Modelling techniques for the seismic assessment of existing Italian RC frame structures.” J. Earthquake Eng. 23 (8): 1262–1296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1360224.
Özcan, O. 2014. “Stiffness modeling of RC columns reinforced with plain rebars.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 50 (2): 163–180. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.50.2.163.
Özcan, O. 2018. “Rotation capacities of RC columns reinforced with plain rebars.” J. Earthquake Eng. 25 (16): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1509809.
Özcan, O., B. Binici, E. Canbay, and G. Özcebe. 2010a. “Repair and strengthening of reinforced concrete columns with CFRPs.” J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 29 (22): 3411–3424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684410376332.
Özcan, O., B. Binici, and G. Özcebe. 2008. “Improving seismic performance of deficient reinforced concrete columns using carbon fiber-reinforced polymers.” Eng. Struct. 30 (6): 1632–1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.10.013.
Özcan, O., B. Binici, and G. Özcebe. 2010b. “Seismic strengthening of rectangular reinforced concrete columns using fiber reinforced polymers.” Eng. Struct. 32 (4): 964–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.021.
Paolacci, F., and R. Giannini. 2012. “An experimental and numerical investigation on the cyclic response of a portal frame pier belonging to an old reinforced concrete viaduct.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41 (6): 1109–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1175.
Park, R. 2002. “A summary of results of simulated seismic load tests on reinforced concrete beam-column joints, beams and columns with substandard reinforcing details.” J. Earthquake Eng. 6 (2): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460209350413.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research). 2013. “Pacific earthquake engineering research (PEER) NGA-West2 database.” Accessed August 15, 2020. https://peer.berkeley.edu/research/nga-west-2.
Pham, T. P., and B. Li. 2014. “Seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns with plain longitudinal reinforcing bars.” ACI Struct. J. 111 (3): 561–572. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686572.
Ricci, P., M. T. De Risi, G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2016. “Experimental tests of unreinforced exterior beam–column joints with plain bars.” Eng. Struct. 118 (Jul): 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.033.
Ricci, P., G. M. Verderame, and G. Manfredi. 2013. “ASCE/SEI 41 provisions on deformation capacity of older-type reinforced concrete columns with plain bars.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (12): 04013014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000701.
Russo, G., and M. Pauletta. 2012. “Seismic behavior of exterior beam-column connections with plain bars and effects of upgrade.” ACI Struct. J. 109 (2): 225–233. https://doi.org/10.14359/51683633.
Turkish Standards Institution. 1997. Calculation values of loads used in designing structural elements. TS498-1997. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Standards Institution.
Turkish Standards Institution. 2000. Requirements for design and construction of reinforced concrete structures. TS500-2000. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Standards Institution.
Verderame, G. M., G. De Carlo, P. Ricci, and G. Fabbrocino. 2009a. “Cyclic bond behaviour of plain bars. Part II: Analytical investigation.” Const. Build. Mater. 23 (12): 3512–3522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.07.001.
Verderame, G. M., M. T. De Risi, and P. Ricci. 2018. “Experimental investigation of exterior unreinforced beam-column joints with plain and deformed bars.” J. Earthquake Eng. 22 (3): 404–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1233917.
Verderame, G. M., G. Fabbrocino, and G. Manfredi. 2008a. “Seismic response of R.C. columns with smooth reinforcement. Part I: Monotonic tests.” Eng. Struct. 30 (9): 2277–2288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.025.
Verderame, G. M., G. Fabbrocino, and G. Manfredi. 2008b. “Seismic response of R.C. columns with smooth reinforcement. Part II: Cylic tests.” Eng. Struct. 30 (9): 2289–2300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.024.
Verderame, G. M., and P. Ricci. 2018. “An empirical approach for nonlinear modelling and deformation capacity assessment of RC columns with plain bars.” Eng. Struct. 176 (Dec): 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.022.
Verderame, G. M., P. Ricci, G. De Carlo, and G. Manfredi. 2009b. “Cyclic bond behaviour of plain bars. Part I: Experimental investigation.” Const. Build. Mater. 23 (12): 3499–3511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.07.002.
Xing, G., C. Zhou, T. Wu, and B. Q. Liu. 2015. “Experimental study on bond behavior between plain reinforcing bars and concrete.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 604280. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/604280.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 36Issue 2April 2022

History

Received: Mar 5, 2021
Accepted: Nov 16, 2021
Published online: Dec 29, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 29, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Akdeniz Univ., Dumlupınar Boulevard, Konyaaltı, Antalya 07070, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9905-1657. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kocaeli Univ., Umuttepe Campus, İzmit, Kocaeli 41001, Turkey (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7241-7652. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share