Technical Papers
Oct 8, 2021

An Integral Approach to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and Fragility Assessment for Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35, Issue 6

Abstract

Fragility curves are useful tools for presenting the risk of structural damage from earthquakes as a function of a ground-motion parameter. Seismic hazard analysis for an area precedes the fragility analysis for structures built in that area. Many studies are available in the literature regarding probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and fragility estimation. However, a practical approach to integrate the hazard curve from PSHA and using the ground motion of that level to estimate fragility can be an area to explore further. In this study, an effort has been made to obtain peak ground acceleration (PGA) level at design-based earthquake (DBE) from PSHA. Based on this PGA value obtained, a fragility assessment has been performed. This study aims to obtain a fragility curve for a midrise RC frame building for DBE hazard level using PSHA. Three 6-story RC frame buildings are considered in this study for a seismically active zone in India. The buildings have been designed with the following performance objectives: (1) immediate occupancy (IO) with 1% drift, (2) life safety (LS) with 2% drift, and (3) collapse prevention (CP) with 3% drift. Incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) is performed using 22 numbers of far-field ground motions as prescribed by a strong ground-motion database to obtain the capacity of exceeding the respective drift limit states. Fragility curves for the three buildings are generated based on those capacities. The present study is a practical approach to capture the consequence of seismic hazard for an area and predicting the seismic risk.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data and computer programs used, generated, or analyzed during the study are included in the published paper and Supplemental Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors highly acknowledge the reviewers for their valuable comments that has enhanced the quality of manuscript. The first author (GR) acknowledges the students’ scholarship received from the Ministry of Human Resource and Development, Government of India.

References

Anbazhagan, P., J. S. Vinod, and T. G. Sitharam. 2009. “Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore.” Nat. Hazards 48 (2): 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9253-3.
Bahuguna, A., and A. Sil. 2020. “Comprehensive seismicity, seismic sources and seismic hazard assessment of Assam, North East India.” J. Earthquake Eng. 24 (2): 254–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2018.1453405.
Baker, J. W. 2008. “An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA).” Accessed January 22, 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-Introduction-to-Probabilistic-Seismic-Hazard-Baker/119e720925406e2dc97fdca3ee099d7188612913.
Baker, J. W. 2015. “Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M.
Baro, O., A. Kumar, and A. Ismail-Zadeh. 2018. “Seismic hazard assessment of the Shillong Plateau, India.” Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk 9 (1): 841–861. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2018.1494043.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2016. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1: General provisions and buildings. IS-1893:Part-1. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Chen, W.-P., and P. Molnar. 1990. “Source parameters of earthquakes and intraplate deformation beneath the Shillong Plateau and the northern Indoburman ranges.” J. Geophys. Res. 95 (8): 12527–12552. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb095ib08p12527.
Choudhury, S., and S. M. Singh. 2013. “A unified approach to performance-based design of RC frame buildings.” J. Inst. Eng. (India): Ser. A 94 (2): 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-013-0037-8.
Cornell, C. A. 1968. “Engineering seismic risk analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58 (5): 1583–1606. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0580051583.
CSI (Computer and Structures). n.d. Structural analysis programme. SAP2000. Berkeley, CA: CSI.
Das, S., I. D. Gupta, and V. K. Gupta. 2006. “A probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Northeast India.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2163914.
Delavaud, E., F. Scherbaum, N. Kuehn, and T. Allen. 2012. “Testing the global applicability of ground-motion prediction equations for active shallow crustal regions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 102 (2): 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110113.
Devi, A., and S. Kalita. 2014. “Seismic hazard analysis of Northeast India and its adjoining region.” Int. J. Environ. Sci. 4 (4): 589–604. https://doi.org/10.6088/ijes.2014040400014.
Dutta, S., and A. H. Gandomi. 2019. “Design of experiments for uncertainty quantification based on polynomial chaos expansion metamodels.” In Handbook of probabilistic models. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Dutta, S., S. Ghosh, and M. M. Inamdar. 2017. “Reliability-based design optimization of frame-supported tensile membrane structures.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (2): G4016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000866.
Faccioli, E., and M. Villani. 2009. “Seismic hazard mapping for Italy in terms of broadband displacement response spectra.” Earthquake Spectra 25 (3): 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3159004.
FEMA. 1997. NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA-274. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA-356. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA-P695. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gupta, D. S., and D. R. Nandy. 1982. “Seismicity and tectonics of Meghalaya Plateau, northeastern India.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 7th Symp. on Earthquake Engineering, 19–24. Roorkee, India: Univ. of Roorkee.
Gutenberg, B., and C. F. Richter. 1945. “Frequency of earthquakes in California.” Nature 156 (3960): 371. https://doi.org/10.1038/156371a0.
Ibarra, L. F., and H. Krawinkler. 2005. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford Univ.
Jain, S. K., A. D. Roshan, J. N. Arlekar, and P. C. Basu. 2000. “Empirical attenuation relationships for the Himalayan earthquakes based on Indian strong motion data.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Seismic Zonation. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kaplan, S., H. F. Perla, and D. C. Bley. 1983. “A methodology for seismic risk analysis of Nuclear power plants.” Risk Anal. 3 (3): 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1983.tb00118.x.
Kayal, J. R. 1998. “Seismicity of northeast India and surroundings—Development over the past 100 years.” J. Geophys. 19 (1): 9–34.
Kennedy, R. P., C. A. Cornell, R. D. Campbell, S. Kaplan, and H. F. Perla. 1980. “Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant.” Nucl. Eng. Des. 59 (2): 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(80)90203-4.
Khattri, K. N., A. M. Rogers, D. M. Perkins, and S. T. Algermissen. 1984. “A seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas.” Tectonophysics 108 (1–2): 93–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90156-2.
Kirçil, M. S., and Z. Polat. 2006. “Fragility analysis of mid-rise R/C frame buildings.” Eng. Struct. 28 (9): 1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.004.
Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Seattle: Univ. of Washington.
Lin, P. S., and C. T. Lee. 2008. “Ground-motion attenuation relationships for subduction-zone earthquakes in northeastern Taiwan.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 98 (1): 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060002.
Nath, S. K., A. Raj, K. K. S. Thingbaijam, and A. Kumar. 2009. “Ground motion synthesis and seismic scenario in Guwahati city—A stochastic approach.” Seismol. Res. Lett. 80 (2): 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.2.233.
NDMA (National Disaster management Authority). 2011. Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India. New Delhi, India: NDMA.
Peñarubia, H. C., et al. 2020. “Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis model for the Philippines.” Earthquake Spectra 36 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019900521.
Pettinga, J. D., and M. J. N. Priestley. 2005. “Dynamic behaviour of reinforced concrete frames designed with direct displacement-based design.” J. Earthquake Eng. 9 (2): 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246905002419.
Porter, K., R. Kennedy, and R. Bachman. 2007. “Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (2): 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2720892.
Rao, A., D. Dutta, P. Kalita, N. Ackerley, V. Silva, M. Raghunandan, J. Ghosh, S. Ghosh, S. Brzev, and K. Dasgupta. 2020. “Probabilistic seismic risk assessment of India.” Earthquake Spectra 36 (1): 345–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020957374.
Scherbaum, F., E. Delavaud, and C. Riggelsen. 2009. “Model selection in seismic hazard analysis: An information-theoretic perspective.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 99 (6): 3234–3247. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120080347.
Seismosoft. 2016. “SeismoMatch—A computer program for spectrum matching of earthquake records.” Accessed March 23, 2021. https://www.seismosoft.com.
Sharma, M. L., J. Douglas, H. Bungum, and J. Kotadia. 2009. “Ground-motion prediction equations based on data from the Himalayan and Zagros regions.” J. Earthquake Eng. 13 (8): 1191–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460902859151.
Sheather, S. J. 2004. “Density estimation.” Stat. Sci. 19 (4): 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1214/088342304000000297.
Silva, V., et al. 2020. “Development of a global seismic risk model.” Supplement, Earthquake Spectra 36 (S1): 372–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019899953.
Sitharam, T. G., S. Kolathayar, and N. James. 2015. “Probabilistic assessment of surface level seismic hazard in India using topographic gradient as a proxy for site condition.” Geosci. Front. 6 (6): 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2014.06.002.
Song, X. 2020. “Parameterized fragility analysis of steel frame structure subjected to blast loads using Bayesian logistic regression method.” Struct. Saf. 87 (4): 102000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102000.
Surana, M., Y. Singh, and D. H. Lang. 2018. “Fragility analysis of hillside buildings designed for modern seismic design codes.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 27 (14): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1500.
Vamvatsikos, D., and C. A. Cornell. 2002. “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35Issue 6December 2021

History

Received: Apr 15, 2021
Accepted: Aug 23, 2021
Published online: Oct 8, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 8, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Geetopriyo Roy, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Silchar, Assam 788010, India. Email: [email protected]
Satyabrata Choudhury [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Silchar, Assam 788010, India. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Silchar, Assam 788010, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8877-0840. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • An Integrated Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1035, 9, 2, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share