Technical Papers
Aug 5, 2021

Data Acquisition and Structural Analysis for Bridge Deck Condition Assessment Using Ground Penetration Radar

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35, Issue 5

Abstract

Bridge networks are a pillar of any national economy, and regular maintenance should be a high priority. Many transportation agencies require the condition assessment of concrete bridge decks as part of maintenance programs. Conventional, nondestructive bridge deck inspection techniques include hammer sounding and chain dragging. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) has been extensively used in recent years and has become an invaluable technique due to its high level of accuracy, speed, and low cost. This study provides a method to locate the corroded areas of the bridge deck slab in addition to getting structural properties such as rebar diameter, number and spacing. A clear methodology for the data collection, processing, and analysis of collected raw data is presented. Data is collected on site using ground-coupled GPR and then numerical amplitude method is used in the analysis. The study also clearly shows how to determine (1) bridge deck slab thickness, (2) asphalt layer thickness, (3) arrangement of steel rebar of the slab, (4) plotting corrosion map, and (5) generation deterioration model. Gathered data are grouped into four clusters using three clustering techniques based on the RapidMiner platform. GPR data interpretation is performed using integration between the amplitude method and visual interpretation, with threshold calibration based on K-means clustering. Simultaneously, the generated corrosion map is validated using the Weibull-based deterioration curves adopted by the New York State Department of Transportation and used since 1981, and the condition ratings used by the Federal Highway Administration in the United States. The corrosion index calculated from the clustered data is so close to the condition index obtained by the deterioration curve. A finite-element analysis is conducted in parallel to compare the stresses on the slab deck with the developed corrosion map. A sensitivity analysis is performed to identify the formula governing the amplitudes with the rebar area based on the finite-element analysis and the validated corrosion map.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT), Egypt, JESOR-Development Program—Project ID: 40.

References

Abouhamad, M., T. Dawood, A. Jabri, M. Alsharqawi, and T. Zayed. 2017. “Corrosiveness mapping of bridge decks using image-based analysis of GPR data.” Autom. Constr. 80 (Jan): 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.03.004.
Agrawal, A. K., A. Kawaguchi, and Z. Chen. 2010. “Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000123.
Berktold, A., K. G. Wollny, and H. Alstetter. 1998. “Subsurface moisture determination with the ground wave of GPR.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Ground-Penetrating Radar. Lawrence, KS: Univ. of Kansas.
Bolshakova, N., and F. Azuaje. 2003. “Cluster validation techniques for genome expression data.” Signal Process. 83 (4): 825–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1684(02)00475-9.
Bolukbasi, M., J. Mohammadi, and D. Arditi. 2004. “Estimating the future condition of highway bridge components using national bridge inventory data.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 9 (1): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2004)9:1(16).
Bungey, J. H. 2004. “Sub-surface radar testing of concrete: A review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 18 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00093-X.
CAPMAS (Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics). 2020. “Statistical data and conducts the census.” Accessed June 2, 2020. https://www.capmas.gov.eg/Pages/Publications.aspx?page_id=5109&Year=16597.
Chang, C. W., C. H. Lin, and H. S. Lien. 2009. “Measurement radius of reinforcing steel bar in concrete using digital image GPR.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (2): 1057–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.018.
Daniels, J. J., L. Wielopolski, S. Radzevicius, and J. Bookshar. 2003. “3D GPR polarization analysis for imaging complex objects.” In Proc., 16th EEGS Symp. on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems. Houten, Netherlands: European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
Davies, D. L., and D. W. Bouldin. 1979. “A cluster separation measure.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2 (Apr): 224–227. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909.
Dunn, J. C. 1974. “Well-separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions.” J. Cyber. 4 (1): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969727408546059.
Federal Highway Administration. 1998. Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges. Washington, DC: USDOT.
GARBLT (General Authority for Roads, Bridges and Land Transport). 2014. “The project for improvement of the bridge management capacity.” Accessed January 15, 2020. https://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/evaluation/tech_and_grant/project/term/middle_east/c8h0vm000001s0sl-att/egypt_2014_02.pdf.
Ghani, A. H. A., S. F. Senin, and R. Hamid. 2013. “Attenuation of ground penetrating radar signal amplitude in monitoring reinforced steel corrosion.” J. Teknologi 59 (2): 65. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v59.2568.
Günter, S., and H. Bunke. 2003. “Validation indices for graph clustering.” Pattern Recognit. Lett. 24 (8): 1107–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8655(02)00257-X.
Guy, E. D., J. J. Daniels, S. J. Radzevicius, and M. A. Vendl. 1999. “Demonstration of using crossed dipole GPR antennae for site characterization.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 26 (22): 3421–3424. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL008365.
He, X. Q., Z. Q. Zhu, Q. Y. Liu, and G. Y. Lu. 2009. “Review of GPR rebar detection.” In Proc., Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symp., 804–813. Cambridge, MA: Electromagnetics Academy.
Jones, L., S. Pessiki, C. Naito, and I. C. Hodgson. 2010. “Inspection methods & techniques to determine non visible corrosion of prestressing strands in concrete bridge components.” In Task 2—Assessment of candidate NDT methods. ATLSS Report No. 09-09. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh Univ.
Leucci, G. 2012. “Ground penetrating radar: An application to estimate volumetric water content and reinforced bar diameter in concrete structures.” J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 10 (12): 411–422. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.10.411.
Maser, K. R. 1996. “Condition assessment of transportation infrastructure using ground-penetrating radar.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2 (2): 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1996)2:2(94).
Parrillo, R., R. Roberts, and A. Haggan. 2006. “Bridge deck condition assessment using ground penetrating radar.” In Proc., European Conf. Non-Destructive Testing, 112. Waltham, MA: Olympus Scientific Solutions Americas.
Patidar, V., S. Labi, K. C. Sinha, P. D. Thompson, A. Shirole, and W. Hyman. 2007. “Performance measures for enhanced bridge management.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1991 (1): 43–53. https://doi.org/10.3141/1991-06.
Radzevicius, S. J., and J. J. Daniels. 2000. “Ground penetrating radar polarization and scattering from cylinders.” J. Appl. Geophys. 45 (2): 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(00)00023-9.
RapidMiner. 2016. “RapidMiner 7.5.” Accessed June 8, 2016. https://rapidminer.com/products/studio/.
Shihab, S., and W. Al-Nuaimy. 2005. “Radius estimation for cylindrical objects detected by ground penetrating radar.” Subsurface Sens. Technol. Appl. 6 (2): 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11220-005-0004-1.
Tokdemir, O. B., C. Ayvalik, and J. Mohammadi. 2000. “Prediction of highway bridge performance by artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms.” In Proc., 17th Int. Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 1091–1098. Washington, DC: International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction.
Varnavina, A. V., A. K. Khamzin, E. V. Torgashov, L. H. Sneed, B. T. Goodwin, and N. L. Anderson. 2015. “Data acquisition and processing parameters for concrete bridge deck condition assessment using ground-coupled ground penetrating radar: Some considerations.” J. Appl. Geophys. 114 (23): 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.01.011.
Verma, M., M. Srivastava, N. Chack, A. K. Diswar, and N. Gupta. 2012. “A comparative study of various clustering algorithms in data mining.” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2 (3): 1379–1384.
Zou, Y., L. P. S. G. Tong, and G. P. Steven. 2000. “Vibration-based model-dependent damage (delamination) identification and health monitoring for composite structures—A review.” J. Sound Vib. 230 (2): 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2624.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35Issue 5October 2021

History

Received: Nov 2, 2020
Accepted: Jun 8, 2021
Published online: Aug 5, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 5, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohamed Ata [email protected]
Master Student, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo Univ., Giza 12613, Egypt. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo Univ., Giza 12613, Egypt. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3278-2655. Email: [email protected]
Mohammed Hassanien Serror [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo Univ., Giza 12613, Egypt. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo Univ., Giza 12613, Egypt (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8594-8452. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share