Technical Papers
Aug 6, 2021

Effects of Wheel Defects on Dynamic Track Buckling in Transition Zones of Open-Deck Steel Bridges

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35, Issue 5

Abstract

Track buckling potential can be higher in the transition zones of steel bridges due to the combination of contact loads and large compressive forces present in this region because of rail and bridge thermal loads. Wheel–rail contact loads are also magnified due to wheel defects, which has not been addressed before in the literature. The aim of this paper is to have an in-depth investigation of the effects of wheel defects on dynamic track buckling in the transition zones of open-deck steel bridges by employing a multibody train–track dynamic model and a three-dimensional (3D) finite-element track model. Various amplitudes of wheel defects as well as normal and severe braking scenarios are simulated. Because the magnitude of bridge thermal loads in the transition zones is determined by the longitudinal track–bridge interaction, three fastening profiles between the track and the bridge are introduced using resilient and zero toe load (ZTL) fasteners. Based on the results, it is concluded that wheel defects can have a significant effect on dynamic track buckling. Dynamic track buckling temperature can drop by 33% compared to the static track buckling of open track, depending on the amplitude of wheel defect, type of the wagon wheel brake, and girder temperature. Further experimental tests are required to evaluate the applicability of mitigation methods to avoid track buckling in the transition zones, such as using various shapes of sleepers in this zone.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported under Australian Research Council’s Industrial Transformation Training Centres Scheme (ARC Training Centre for Advanced Technologies in Rail Track Infrastructure; IC170100006). The work reported in this paper was formulated initially by Manicka Dhanasekar, former professor of infrastructure engineering at the first author’s institution, in collaboration with Queensland Rail.

References

Abaqus. 2012. Abaqus user’s manual. Johnston, RI: Dassault Systemes Simulia.
Ahmad, S. S., N. K. Mandal, G. Chattopadhyay, and J. Powell. 2013. “Development of a unified railway track stability management tool to enhance track safety.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 227 (5): 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409713501490.
Ali, S., D. Thambiratnam, X. Liu, and S. Fawzia. 2020. “Performance evaluation of innovative composite pedestrian bridge.” Structures 26 (Aug): 845–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.010.
Andrea, F. 2014. “Transition zones for railway bridges: A study of the Sikån bridge.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå Univ. of Technology.
Ataei, S., and A. Miri. 2018. “Investigating dynamic amplification factor of railway masonry arch bridges through dynamic load tests.” Constr. Build. Mater. 183 (Sep): 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.151.
Ataei, S., A. Miri, and M. Jahangiri. 2017a. “Assessing safety of a railway stone arch bridge by experimental and numerical analyses.” J. Croatian Assoc. Civ. Eng. 69 (11): 1017–1029. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1612.2016.
Ataei, S., A. Miri, and M. Jahangiri. 2017b. “Assessment of load carrying capacity enhancement of an open spandrel masonry arch bridge by dynamic load testing.” Int. J. Archit. Heritage 11 (8): 1086–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2017.1317882.
Ataei, S., A. Miri, and M. Tajalli. 2017c. “Dynamic load testing of a railway masonry arch bridge: A case study of Babak Bridge.” Sci. Iran. 24 (4): 1834–1842. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4274.
Ataei, S., A. Miri, and M. Tajalli. 2018. “Implementing relative deflection of adjacent blocks in model calibration of masonry arch bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (4): 04018037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001171.
Ataei, S., S. Mohammadzadeh, H. Jadidi, and A. Miri. 2014. “Effects of maintenance operations on railway track’s mechanical behaviour by field load testing.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 15 (3): 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2013.778991.
Ataei, S., S. Mohammadzadeh, and A. Miri. 2016a. “Dynamic forces at square and inclined rail joints: Field experiments.” J. Transp. Eng. 142 (9): 04016035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000866.
Ataei, S., M. Tajalli, and A. Miri. 2016b. “Assessment of load carrying capacity and fatigue life expectancy of a monumental masonry arch bridge by field load testing: A case study of Veresk.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 59 (4): 703–718. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.4.703.
Banimahd, M., P. K. Woodward, J. Kennedy, and G. M. Medero. 2012. “Behaviour of train–track interaction in stiffness transitions.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Transp. 165 (3): 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.10.00030.
Berggren, E. 2009. “Railway track stiffness: Dynamic measurements and evaluation for efficient maintenance.” Ph.D. thesis, Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Div. of Rail Vehicles, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).
Choi, J. 2013. “Influence of track support stiffness of ballasted track on dynamic wheel-rail forces.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (7): 709–718. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000543.
Dahlberg, T. 2010. “Railway track stiffness variations—Consequences and countermeasures.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 8 (1): 1–12.
De Backer, H., A. Outtier, and P. Van Bogaert. 2014. “Buckling design of steel tied-arch bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 103 (Dec): 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.09.004.
Frohling, R. D., H. Scheffel, and W. Ebersohn. 1996. “The vertical dynamic response of a rail vehicle caused by track stiffness variations along the track.” Supplement, Veh. Syst. Dyn. 25 (S1): 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119608969194.
Handoko, Y. 2006. Investigation of the dynamics of railway bogies subjected to traction/braking torque. Norman Gardens, QLD, Australia: Central Queensland Univ.
Huang, H., and B. Brennecke. 2013. “Track stiffness transition zone studied with three-dimensional sandwich track model.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2374 (1): 136–142. https://doi.org/10.3141/2374-16.
Hunt, H. E. M., and Winkler. 1997. “Settlement of railway track near bridge abutments.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Transp. 123 (1): 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1680/itran.1997.29182.
Iorio, A. D. 2014. “Transverse strength of railway tracks: Part 2. Test system for ballast resistance line measurement.” Frattura Integrità Strutturale 8 (Oct): 578–592. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.30.69.
Jing, G., and P. Aela. 2019. “Review of the lateral resistance of ballasted tracks.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 234 (8): 807–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409719866355.
Kerr, A. 1976. “The effects of lateral resistance on track buckling.” Rail Int. 1: 30–38.
Kerr, A. D., and B. E. Moroney. 1993. “Track transition problems and remedies.” Bull. Am. Railway Eng. Assoc. 742: 267–298.
Khatibi, F., M. Esmaeili, and S. Mohammadzadeh. 2020. “Numerical investigation into the effect of ballast properties on buckling of continuously welded rail (CWR).” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409720965794.
Kish, A., and G. Samavedam. 1991. Dynamic buckling of continuous welded rail track: Theory, tests, and safety concepts. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Kish, A., G. Samavedam, and D. Jeong. 1982. Analysis of thermal buckling tests on U.S. railroads. Washington, DC: Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Research and Development.
Kish, A., G. Samavedam, and D. Jeong. 1985. Influence of vehicle induced loads on the lateral stability of CWR track. Washington, DC: Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Research and Development.
Lan, Q., M. Dhanasekar, and Y. A. Handoko. 2019. “Wear damage of out-of-round wheels in rail wagons under braking.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 102 (Aug): 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.019.
Li, D., and D. Davis. 2005. “Transition of railroad bridge approaches.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (11): 1392–1398. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:11(1392).
Li, D., J. Hyslip, T. Sussmann, and S. Chrismer. 2016. Railway geotechnics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lim, N., S. Han, and T. Han. 2008. “Parametric study on stability of continuous welded rail track– ballast resistance and track irregularity.” Steel Struct. 8 (3): 171–181.
Lim, N., N. Park, and Y. Kang. 2003. “Stability of continuous welded rail track.” Comput. Struct. 81 (22–23): 2219–2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00287-6.
Lim, N., and I. Sung. 2004. “Thermal buckling behaviour of continuous welded rail track.” Steel Struct. 4 (2): 111–119.
Long, J. H., S. M. Olson, T. D. Stark, and E. A. Samara. 1998. “Differential movement at embankment-bridge structure interface in Illinois.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1633 (1): 53–60. https://doi.org/10.3141/1633-07.
Mandal, N. K., and M. Lees. 2019. “Effectiveness of measuring stress-free temperature in continuously welded rails by rail creep method and rail stress modules.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 104 (Oct): 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.05.032.
Miri, A., J. Ali Zakeri, D. Thambiratnam, and T. H. T. Chan. 2021a. “Effect of shape of concrete sleepers for mitigating of track buckling.” Constr. Build. Mater. 294 (Aug): 123568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123568.
Miri, A., M. Dhanasekar, D. Thambiratnam, B. Weston, and T. H. T. Chan. 2021b. “Analysis of buckling failure in continuously welded railway tracks.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 119 (Jan): 104989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104989.
Miri, A., S. Mohammadzadeh, and H. Salek. 2017. “A finite element approach to develop track geometrcial irregularity thresholds from the safety aspect.” J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 55 (2): 695–705. https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-pl.55.2.695.
Miri, A., D. Thambiratnam, T. H. T. Chan, and B. Weston. 2021c. “Transition zones of open-deck steel bridges as hotspots for CWR track buckling.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 35 (3): 04021016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001587.
Miri, A., D. Thambiratnam, B. Weston, T. H. T. Chan, and M. Dhanasekar. 2021d. “Lateral stability of CWR tracks in transition zones of open-deck steel bridges.” Structures 33 (Oct): 897–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.009.
Miri, A., D. P. Thambiratnam, and T. Chan. 2021e. “Thermal challenges of replacing jointed rails with CWR on steel railway bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 181 (Jun): 106627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106627.
Mohammadzadeh, S., and A. Miri. 2018. “Ballast cleaning as a solution for controlling increased bridge vibrations due to higher operational speeds.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (5): 04018064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001194.
Mohammadzadeh, S., A. Miri, and M. Nouri. 2017. “Enhancing the structural performance of masonry arch bridges with ballast mats.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 31 (5): 04017089. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001080.
Mohammadzadeh, S., A. Miri, and M. Nouri. 2018. “Assessing ballast cleaning as a rehabilitation method for railway masonry arch bridges by dynamic load tests.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 232 (4): 1135–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409717710047.
Nicks, J. 2009. “The bump at the end of the railway bridge.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ.
Piculin, S., and P. Može. 2020. “Experimental and numerical analysis of stiffened curved plates as bottom flanges of steel bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 164 (Jan): 105822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105822.
Pucillo, G. P. 2016. “Thermal buckling and post-buckling behaviour of continuous welded rail track.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 54 (12): 1785–1807. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2016.1237665.
Samavedam, G., A. Kish, and D. Jeong. 1983. Parametric studies on lateral stability of welded rail track. Washington, DC: US DOT.
Samavedam, G., A. Kish, and A. Purple. 1993. Parametric analysis and safety concepts of CWR track buckling. Washington, DC: US DOT.
Shabana, A. A., and J. R. Sany. 2001. “A survey of rail vehicle track simulations and flexible multibody dynamics.” Nonlinear Dyn. 26 (2): 179–212.
So, W., and G. Martin. 1978. “Finite element model for track buckling.” In Advanced techniques in track/train dynamics and design, 315–328. Parsippany, NJ: Associated Pile and Fitting Corporation.
So, W., and W. Yang. 1978. “Mathematical model for lateral thermal buckling and displacement of curved track.” Transp. Res. Rec. 694 (1): 24–29.
Tafsirojjaman, T., S. Fawzia, and D. Thambiratnam. 2020a. “Investigation on the behaviour of CFRP strengthened CHS members under monotonic loading through finite element modelling.” Structures 28 (Dec): 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.08.059.
Tafsirojjaman, T., S. Fawzia, D. Thambiratnam, and X.-L. Zhao. 2020b. “Numerical investigation of CFRP strengthened RHS members under cyclic loading.” Structures 24 (Apr): 610–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.041.
Villalba, I. R. I., P. Salvador, and P. Martinez. 2016. “Methodology for evaluating thermal track buckling in dual gauge tracks with continuous welded rail.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 231 (3): 269–279.
Yang, G., and M. A. Bradford. 2016. “Thermal-induced buckling and postbuckling analysis of continuous railway tracks.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 97–98 (Oct): 637–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.04.037.
Yang, G., and M. A. Bradford. 2018. “On train speed reduction in circumstances of thermally-induced railway track buckling.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 92 (Oct): 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.02.009.
Yazdani, M., and P. Azimi. 2020. “Assessment of railway plain concrete arch bridges subjected to high-speed trains.” Structures 27 (Oct): 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.042.
Zaman, M., A. Gopalasingam, and J. G. Laguros. 1991. “Consolidation settlement of bridge approach foundation.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (2): 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:2(219).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35Issue 5October 2021

History

Received: Feb 11, 2021
Accepted: May 14, 2021
Published online: Aug 6, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 6, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6106-5882. Email: [email protected]
David P. Thambiratnam, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia. Email: [email protected]
T. H. T. Chan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland Univ. of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Dynamic Monitoring of Rail Behavior under Passenger Train Loading Using Distributed Fiber Optic Sensors, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 10.1061/JPCFEV.CFENG-4750, 38, 4, (2024).
  • Mitigation of track buckling in transition zones of steel bridges by geotextile reinforcement of the ballast layer, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.11.006, 50, 2, (282-292), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share