Technical Papers
Jul 2, 2021

GIS-Based Financial Analysis Model for Integrated Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Underground Pipe Networks

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35, Issue 5

Abstract

The monitoring and determination of the suitable time for performing the maintenance works of municipal infrastructures consisting of water, sewer, drainage, and road networks have been matters of concern for the related authorities. Infrastructure facilities usually share the same space, which dictates the importance of implementing integrated maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement (MR&R) plans. The optimization of MR&R plans for all these facilities greatly depends on knowing how to predict the future status of these facilities and how much cost would be incurred by such activities. This research deals with the development of a financial model based on an integrated MR&R approach by utilizing geographical information system (GIS)-based data and tools. Such systems maintain the data of each facility on GIS platforms and reflect its operational status regarding need and priority for rehabilitation. Two case studies are performed for the research along with numerical examples using the developed financial model for integrated MR&R. Various factors including sacrificed service life cost, direct cost, and social and environmental impact costs are incorporated in the model. The results show that there is a significant difference in costs incurred when using the integrated MR&R activity approach for replacing sewer pipes along with water supply pipes compared with dealing with each facility separately because it reduced the cost of sewer replacement by almost 39% and 37% for first and second case, respectively. The reduction is further expected to increase in case more facilities are rehabilitated at the same time. The application and the validation of the developed model are done by using a logical approach of applicability factor. The research shall prove to be beneficial for the infrastructure design and execution industries as well as the related municipal authorities in the management and planning of cost and execution works efficiently.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Baufume, S., F. Gruger, T. Grube, D. Krieg, J. Linssen, M. Weber, J. F. Hake, and D. Stolten. 2013. “GIS-based scenario calculations for a nationwide German hydrogen pipeline infrastructure.” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38 (10): 3813–3829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.147.
Bruxelle, C. 2005. “Élaboration d’un cadre de système d’aide à la gestion et à l’entretien (SAGE) des infrastructures civiles.” Ph.D. thesis, Département de génie de la Construction, École de Technologie Supérieure.
ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 2021. “ArcMap online library.” Accessed January 11, 2021. https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-online/overview.
Ferreira, A. J. L., and A. D. S. Duarte. 2006. “A GIS-based infrastructure management system for municipalities.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng. 159 (2): 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.2006.159.2.113.
Frisinger, J. 2014. “DoD adopts Army Corps of Engineers BUILDER SMS standard for all facility condition assessments.” Accessed January 6, 2014. https://www.usace.army.mil/Media/News-Archive/Story-Article-View/Article/478203/dod-adopts-army-corps-of-engineers-builder-sms-standard-for-all-facility-condit/.
Google Earth. 2021. “Google LLC, Amphitheater Parkway, Mountain View, California, USA, and Alkhobar Shumalia, Eastern Region, KSA.” Accessed March 4, 2021. https://www.google.com/earth/.
Grussing, M. N. 2012. Facility degradation and prediction models for sustainment, restoration, and modernization (SRM) planning. Washington, DC: Installation Technology Transition Program, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, USACE.
Guild, R. L. 2000. “Infrastructure investment and interregional development: Theory, evidence, and implications for planning.” Public Works Manage. Policy 4 (4): 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X0044002.
Halfawy, M. R., L. Dridi, and S. Baker. 2007. “A GIS-based decision support system for optimal renewal planning of sewers.” In Proc., 13th Annual Conf. on Urban Infrastructure (INFRA 2007). Ottawa: National Research Council Canada.
Halfawy, M. R., L. A. Newton, and D. J. Vanier. 2006. “Review of commercial municipal infrastructure asset management systems.” Decis. Support Syst. Infrastruct. Manage. 11: 211–224.
Halfawy, M. R., D. Pyzoha, and T. El-Hosseiny. 2002. “An integrated framework for GIS based civil infrastructure management systems.” In Proc., 30th Annual Conf. of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, 1–10. Montréal: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Halfawy, M. R., D. J. Vanier, and D. Hubble. 2004. “Integration of municipal information systems for sustainable management of infrastructure assets.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., Environmental Informatics Conf., Environmental Informatics Archives, 375–386. Ottawa: National Research Council Canada.
Hechert, M., and C. D. Rosan. 2018. “Creating GIS-based planning tools to promote equity through green infrastructure.” Front. Built Environ. 4 (May): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2018.00027.
HomeAdvisor. 2021. “HomeAdvisor, Inc., Walnut Street No. 81, Denver, Colorado, USA.” Accessed March 6, 2021. https://www.homeadvisor.com.
Inanloo, B., B. Tansel, K. Shams, X. Jin, and A. Gan. 2016. “A decision aid GIS-based risk assessment and vulnerability analysis approach for transportation and pipeline networks.” Saf. Sci. 84 (Apr): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.018.
Jamil, R. 2018. “Performance of a new pipe material UHMWPE against disinfectant decay in water distribution networks.” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 20 (6): 1287–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1556-9.
Kabir, G., R. Sadiq, and S. Tesfamariam. 2014. “A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (9): 1176–1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.795978.
Karlaftis, M. G., S. M. Madanat, and P. S. McCarthy. 1997. “Development of discrete models of infrastructure deterioration with panel data.” In Proc., of the Speciality Conf. on Infrastructure Condition Assessment: Art, Science, Practice, 21–30. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://cedb.asce.org/CEDBsearch/record.jsp?dockey=0106578.
Mathews, J. C. 2010. “Integrated multi-attribute decision support system for the evaluation of underground utility construction methods.” Ph.D. dissertation, College of Engineering and Science, Louisiana Tech Univ.
Mensah, J. F., W. J. O’Brien, N. Khwaja, and L. C. Bussell. 2017. “GIS-based visualization of integrated highway maintenance and construction planning: A case study of Fort Worth, Texas.” Visualization Eng. 5 (7): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40327-017-0046-1.
Rodrigues, J. C., A. Simao, and C. H. Antunes. 2011. “A GIS-based multicriteria spatial decision support system for planning urban infrastructures.” Decis. Support Syst. 51 (3): 720–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.02.010.
Shaawat, M. E., and R. Jamil. 2014. “A guide to environmental building rating system for construction of new buildings in Saudi Arabia.” Emir. J. Eng. Res. 19 (2): 47–56.
Shaawat, M. E., and R. Jamil. 2018. “Analysis of challenges in sustainable construction industry by using analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Jubail Industrial City, Saudi Arabia.” Int. J. Sustainable Real Estate Constr. Econ. 1 (2): 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSRECE.2018.092254.
Stylianidis, E., et al. 2016. “LBS augmented reality assistive system for utilities infrastructure management through Galileo and EGNOS.” In Vol. XLI-B1 of Proc., Int. Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 1179–2016. Hannover, Germany: International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
Vanier, D. J., and N. H. Danylo. 1998. “Municipal infrastructure investment planning: Asset management.” In Proc., APWA Int. Public Works Congress, 25–39. Washingon, DC: American Public Works Association.
Vanier, D. J., and S. Rahman. 2004. MIIP report: Survey on municipal infrastructure assets.. Ottawa: National Research Council Canada.
Wolthusen, S. D. 2005. “GIS-based command and control infrastructure for critical infrastructure protection.” In Proc., 1st IEEE Int. Workshop on Critical Infrastructure Protection (IWCIP’05). New York: IEEE.
Xu, X., D. S. P. Schreiber, Q. Lu, and Q. Zhang. 2018. “A GIS-based framework creating green stormwater infrastructure inventory relevant to surface transportation planning.” Sustainability 10 (12): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020001.
Yu, W. D., and S. S. Lo. 2005. “Time-dependent construction social cost models.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 23 (3): 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500040281.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35Issue 5October 2021

History

Received: Feb 12, 2021
Accepted: Apr 15, 2021
Published online: Jul 2, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 2, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Building Engineering, College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal Univ., P. O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6864-0683. Email: [email protected]
Engineer, Dept. of Building Engineering, College of Architecture and Planning, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal Univ., P. O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8639-9571. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Developing a Holistic Resilience Framework for Critical Infrastructure Networks of Buildings and Communities in Saudi Arabia, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings13010179, 13, 1, (179), (2023).
  • GIS-based assessment of land use for predicting increase in settlements in Al Ahsa Metropolitan Area, Saudi Arabia for the year 2032, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 10.1016/j.aej.2022.07.020, 62, (269-277), (2023).
  • Construction and maintenance of urban underground infrastructure with digital technologies, Automation in Construction, 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104464, 141, (104464), (2022).
  • Evaluation of Educational Strategies in the Design Process of Infrastructure for a Healthy Sustainable Housing Community, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 10.1016/j.asej.2021.101665, 13, 4, (101665), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share