Cost of Environmental and Human Health Impacts of Repairing Earthquake Damage
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 35, Issue 4
Abstract
Extending existing performance-based initiatives, this paper provides a richer understanding of how earthquakes affect the environment and human health. Utilizing a detailed structural model, a host of emissions is predicted. Subsequently, the cost of environmental damage, such as climate change, and the cost of damage to human health, such as respiratory diseases, are calculated as a monetary value measured in dollars. A shear wall and a 6-story building serve as case studies to demonstrate the methodology and to provide quantitative insights into the effect of earthquakes on the environment and human health. The building is subjected to an earthquake ground motion, and wood, steel, and reinforced concrete options are compared for the load bearing system. The results suggest that the wood option has the lowest cost of emissions associated with repairs. The results provide a detailed account of emissions-related costs during the ground shaking and for different ground shaking intensities.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository or online in accordance with funder data retention policies (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3911388).
References
Anwar, G. A., Y. Dong, and C. Zhai. 2020. “Performance-based probabilistic framework for seismic risk, resilience, and sustainability assessment of reinforced concrete structures.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 23 (7): 1454–1472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219895363.
Arroyo, D., M. Ordaz, and A. Teran-Gilmore. 2015. “Seismic loss estimation and environmental issues.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (3): 1285–1308. https://doi.org/10.1193/020713EQS023M.
Bijleveld, M., S. de Bruyn, L. de Graaff, E. Schep, A. Schroten, and R. Vergeer. 2018a. Environmental prices handbook 2017. Delft, Netherlands: CE Delft.
Bijleveld, M., S. de Bruyn, L. de Graaff, E. Schep, A. Schroten, and R. Vergeer. 2018b. Environmental prices handbook EU28 version. Delft, Netherlands: CE Delft.
Chhabra, J. P. S., V. Hasik, M. M. Bilec, and G. P. Warn. 2018. “Probabilistic assessment of the life-cycle environmental performance and functional life of buildings due to seismic events.” J. Archit. Eng. 24 (1): 04017035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000284.
Ciroth, A. 2007. “ICT for environment in life cycle applications openLCA—A new open source software for life cycle assessment.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 12 (4): 209. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.06.337.
Feese, C., Y. Li, and W. M. Bulleit. 2015. “Assessment of seismic damage of buildings and related environmental impacts.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (4): 04014106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000584.
FEMA. 2018. Seismic performance assessment of buildings. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2019. Performance assessment calculation tool (PACT). Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gavrilovic, S. 2020. Probabilistic lifecycle analysis of earthquake-damaged buildings using building information models. Vancouver, BC: Univ. of British Columbia.
Gavrilovic, S., and T. Haukaas. 2020a. “Multi-model probabilistic analysis of the lifecycle cost of buildings.” J. Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3911388.
Gavrilovic, S., and T. Haukaas. 2020b. Rts. Vancouver, BC: Univ. of British Columbia.
Gavrilovic, S., and T. Haukaas. 2021. “Seismic loss estimation using visual damage models.” J. Struct. Eng. 147 (3): 04020360. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002936.
Gencturk, B., K. Hossain, and S. Lahourpour. 2016. “Life cycle sustainability assessment of RC buildings in seismic regions.” Eng. Struct. 110 (Mar): 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.037.
Huang, M., and K. Simonen. 2020. “Comparative environmental analysis of seismic damage in buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (2): 05019002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002481.
Huijbregts, M. A. J., Z. J. N. Steinmann, P. M. F. Elshout, G. Stam, F. Verones, M. Vieira, M. Zijp, A. Hollander, and R. van Zelm. 2017. “ReCiPe2016: A harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22 (2): 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y.
McKenna, F., M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2010. “Nonlinear finite-element analysis software architecture using object composition.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24 (1): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000002.
Menna, C., D. Asprone, F. Jalayer, A. Prota, and G. Manfredi. 2013. “Assessment of ecological sustainability of a building subjected to potential seismic events during its lifetime.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18 (2): 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0477-9.
Padgett, J. E., and Y. Li. 2016. “Risk-based assessment of sustainability and hazard resistance of structural design.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (2): 04014208. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000723.
Shindell, D. T. 2015. “The social cost of atmospheric release.” Clim. Change 130 (2): 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1343-0.
Wernet, G., C. Bauer, B. Steubing, J. Reinhard, E. Moreno-Ruiz, and B. Weidema. 2016. “The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21 (9): 1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 28, 2020
Accepted: Feb 10, 2021
Published online: May 13, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 13, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.