Technical Papers
Jun 18, 2020

Effect of Load Cases and Hanger-Loss Scenarios on Dynamic Responses of the Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge to Abrupt Rupture of Hangers

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34, Issue 5

Abstract

Self-anchored suspension bridges with large prestressed girders have proven to be suitable bridge structures where external anchorage systems cannot be easily provided. However, these bridges cannot overcome the major limitation that their hangers may suddenly break under hazardous circumstances, which may cause the potential risk of progressive collapse. In this paper, the effects of hanger-loss scenarios and load cases on the structural performance of the self-anchored suspension bridge are studied. To conduct the investigation, several issues related to the nonlinear dynamic simulation are presented. The results obtained from a case study on a concrete self-anchored suspension bridge show that the dynamic effects caused by the hanger-breakage event are heavily dependent on the duration of the breakage process. Compared to the sudden breakage of a single hanger, the asymmetrical loss of two hangers can cause a large torsional moment in the girder and tensile stress in hangers. The influence of load cases on the structural dynamic responses is significant, while the effect on the dynamic amplification factor (DAF) corresponding to hangers and the stiffening girder is not obvious. In addition, it is shown that structural robustness can be better enhanced with double-type hangers than with single-type hangers. Finally, several useful recommendations are proposed for concrete self-anchored suspension bridges to improve structural safety and avoid progressive failure of hangers.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

A detailed view and the established FE model of the prototype bridge are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51778108), which is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Aoki, Y., H. Valipour, B. Samali, and A. Saleh. 2013. “A study on potential progressive collapse responses of cable-stayed bridges.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 16 (4): 689–706. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.16.4.689.
Billah, K. Y., and R. H. Scanlan. 1991. “Resonance, Tacoma narrows bridge failure, and undergraduate physics textbooks.” Am. J. Phys. 59 (2): 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16590.
Buscemi, N., and S. Marjanishvili. 2005. “SDOF model for progressive collapse analysis.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2005, 1–12. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40753(171)221.
Das, R., A. D. Pandey, M. J. Mahesh, P. Saini, and S. Anvesh. 2016. “Progressive collapse of a cable stayed bridge.” Procedia Eng. 144: 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.016.
Fu, F. 2012. “Response of a multi-storey steel composite building with concentric bracing under consecutive column removal scenarios.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 70: 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.012.
Fu, F. 2016. Structural analysis and design to prevent disproportionate collapse. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Fu, F., and G. Parke. 2018. “Assessment of the progressive collapse resistance of double-layer grid space structures using implicit and explicit methods.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 18 (3): 831–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0030-1.
Gerasimidis, S., and C. C. Baniotopoulos. 2011. “Disproportionate collapse analysis of cable-stayed steel roofs for cable loss.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 11 (1): 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13296-011-1008-4.
GSA (General Services Administration). 2003. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects. Washington, DC: US General Services Administration.
Haberland, M., S. Hass, and U. Starossek. 2012. “Robustness assessment of suspension bridges.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, IABMAS12, 1617–1624. London: Taylor & Francis.
Hegeir, O., T. Mizutani, K. Matsumoto, and K. Nagai. 2018. “The cause estimation of damages in pathein suspension bridge based on vibration measurements.” Proceedings 2 (8): 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ICEM18-05209.
Hoang, V., O. Kiyomiya, and T. An. 2016. “Experimental and dynamic response analysis of cable-stayed bridge due to sudden cable loss.” J. Struct. Eng. 62: 50–60. https://doi.org/10.11532/structcivil.62A.50.
Hoang, V., O. Kiyomiya, and T. An. 2018. “Experimental and numerical study of lateral cable rupture in cable-stayed bridges: Case study.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (6): 05018004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001227.
JTG. 2015a. General code for design of highway bridges and culverts. JTG D60. Beijing: China Communications Press.
JTG. 2015b. Specifications for design of highway suspension bridge. JTG/T D65-05. Beijing: China Communications Press.
Kao, C., C. Kou, W. Qiu, and J. Tsai. 2012. “Ultimate load-bearing capacity of self-anchored suspension bridges.” J. Mar. Sci. Tech. 20 (1): 18–25.
Kawai, Y., D. Siringoringo, and Y. Fujino. 2014. “Failure analysis of the hanger clamps of the Kutai-Kartanegara Bridge from the fracture mechanics viewpoint.” J. JSCE 2 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2208/journalofjsce.2.1_1.
Kim, S., and Y. J. Kang. 2016. “Structural behavior of cable-stayed bridges after cable failure.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 59 (6): 1095–1120. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.6.1095.
Liu, Z., T. Guo, M. H. Hebdon, and Z. Zhang. 2018. “Corrosion fatigue analysis and reliability assessment of short suspenders in suspension and arch bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (5): 04018060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001203.
Lonetti, P., and A. Pascuzzo. 2014. “Vulnerability and failure analysis of hybrid cable-stayed suspension bridges subjected to damage mechanisms.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 45 (Oct): 470–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.07.002.
Lu, W., and Z. He. 2014. “Vulnerability and robustness of corroded large-span cable-stayed bridges under marine environment.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (1): 04014204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000727.
Marjanishvili, S., and E. Agnew. 2006. “Comparison of various procedures for progressive collapse analysis.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 20 (4): 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:4(365).
Mozos, C. M., and A. C. Aparicio. 2010a. “Parametric study on the dynamic response of cable stayed bridges to the sudden failure of a stay, Part I: Bending moment acting on the deck.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3288–3300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.003.
Mozos, C. M., and A. C. Aparicio. 2010b. “Parametric study on the dynamic response of cable stayed bridges to the sudden failure of a stay, Part II: Bending moment acting on the pylons and stress on the stays.” Eng. Struct. 32 (10): 3301–3312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.002.
Nghia, N. T., and V. Samec. 2016. “Cable-stay bridges—Investigation of cable rupture.” J. Civ. Eng. Archit. 10: 270–279. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2016.05.006.
Ochsendorf, J. A., and D. P. Billington. 1999. “Self-anchored suspension bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 4 (3): 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1999)4:3(151).
Olamigoke, O. 2018. “Structural response of cable-stayed bridges to cable loss.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Surrey.
PTI (Post-Tensioning Institute). 2012. Recommendations for stay cable design, testing and installation. 6th ed. Farmington Hills, MI: Post-Tensioning Institute.
Qiu, W., M. Jiang, and C. Huang. 2014a. “Parametric study on responses of a self-anchored suspension bridge to sudden breakage of a hanger.” Sci. World J. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/512120.
Qiu, W., M. Jiang, and Z. Zhang. 2014b. “Responses of self-anchored suspension bridge to sudden breakage of hangers.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 50 (2): 241–255. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.50.2.241.
Ruiz-Teran, A. M., and A. C. Aparicio. 2009. “Response of under-deck cable-stayed bridges to the accidental breakage of stay cables.” Eng. Struct. 31 (7): 1425–1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.027.
Samali, B., Y. Aoki, A. Saleh, and H. Valipour. 2015. “Effect of loading pattern and deck configuration on the progressive collapse response of cable-stayed bridges.” Aust. J. Struct. Eng. 16 (1): 17–34. https://doi.org/10.7158/S13-026.2015.16.1.
Shen, R., K. Fang, and K. Guan. 2014. “Robustness analysis of self-anchored suspension bridge with loss of a single sling.” Bridge Constr. [In Chinese.] 44 (6): 35–39.
Shoghijavan, M., and U. Starossek. 2017. “Structural robustness of long-span cable-supported bridges in a cable-loss scenario.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (2): 04017133. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001186.
Shoghijavan, M., and U. Starossek. 2018. “An analytical study on the bending moment acting on the girder of a long-span cable-supported bridge suffering from cable failure.” Eng. Struct. 167 (Jul): 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.017.
Starossek, U. 2007. “Typology of progressive collapse.” Eng. Struct. 29 (9): 2302–2307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.11.025.
Starossek, U., and M. Haberland. 2010. “Disproportionate collapse: Terminology and procedures.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (6): 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000138.
UFC (Unified Facilities Criteria). 2005. Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse. Arlington, VA: Dept. of Defense.
Wolff, M., and U. Starossek. 2009. “Cable loss and progressive collapse in cable-stayed bridges.” Bridge Struct. 5 (1): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732480902775615.
Wu, G., W. Qiu, and T. Wu. 2019. “Nonlinear dynamic analysis of the self-anchored suspension bridge subjected to sudden breakage of a hanger.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 97 (Mar): 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.028.
Wu, W., H. Wang, Y. Zhu, J. Yu, H. Zhao, and H. Zhang. 2018. “New hanger design approach of tied-arch bridge to enhance its robustness.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 22 (11): 4547–4554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1835-3.
Xiang, Y., Z. Chen, Y. Yang, H. Lin, and S. Zhu. 2018. “Dynamic response analysis for submerged floating tunnel with anchor-cables subjected to sudden cable breakage.” Mar. Struct. 59 (May): 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.01.009.
Xu, F., M. Zhang, L. Wang, and Z. Zhang. 2016. “Self-anchored suspension bridges in China.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 22 (1): 04016018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000304.
Zhou, Y., and S. Chen. 2013. “Time-progressive dynamic assessment of abrupt cable-breakage events on cable-stayed bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (2): 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000517.
Zhou, Y., and S. Chen. 2015. “Numerical investigation of cable breakage events on long-span cable-stayed bridges under stochastic traffic and wind.” Eng. Struct. 105 (Dec): 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.009.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34Issue 5October 2020

History

Received: Jun 14, 2019
Accepted: Mar 5, 2020
Published online: Jun 18, 2020
Published in print: Oct 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 18, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Guangrun Wu [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, School of Civil Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China. Email: [email protected]
Wenliang Qiu [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share