Technical Papers
May 18, 2020

Vibration Serviceability Evaluation of Office Building Floors Due to Human Movements

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34, Issue 4

Abstract

The tendency of architects and engineers to reduce construction costs by using high-strength, lightweight materials, and owners’ requirements for large open spaces, along with the new trend in the use of paperless or electronic offices, have resulted in office building floors with excessive vibrations due to walking. The evaluation and assessment of floor movements are important factors that require the attention of architects and engineers. In the past, standards and design guides have simply used the time domain response of the floor when subjected to human movements and suggested limits on the peak or Root Mean Square (RMS) of acceleration for vibration evaluation. Recent standards and design guides have recommended the use of frequency-weighted response (generally acceleration) of the floor to compute the vibration dose value (VDV) in order to assess the vibration serviceability of structures. Based on the results of a number of walking tests conducted on six different office building floors over a span of 6 years, this paper proposes a relationship between VDV and the maximum transient vibration value (MTVV), which is used to recommend acceptable VDV limits to evaluate office floor vibrations. The results of this study also showed a relatively consistent relationship between the VDV and peak frequency-weighted acceleration (aw,p). In addition, a novel usage- (or performance-) based vibration evaluation method was introduced, which is a new approach for the assessment of existing office floors and design of new office floors. In this approach, the acceptable VDV limit for one floor walk is defined based on the expected number of daily walk events. An equivalent equation in terms of the acceptable aw,p limit [(aw,p)a] was introduced for use at the design stage. The appropriateness of the proposed limits was verified using the subjective assessment of the tested building floors, and was compared with the provisions of the current design guides. Comments regarding the definition of high frequency floors, based on the results of the conducted studies, were made.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research presented here was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMMI-1335004. This support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The author acknowledges the assistance of Bhavin Zaveri, Harshil Patel, and Matthew Hannah.

References

BSI (British Standards Institution). 1987. Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock. BS 6841. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 1992. Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz). BS 6472. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2008. Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings—Part 1: Vibration sources other than blasting. BS 6472-1. London: BSI.
Ellis, B. R. 2001. “Serviceability evaluation of floor vibration induced by walking loads.” Struct. Eng. 79 (21): 30–36.
Ellis, B. R. 2003. “The influence of crowd size on floor vibrations induced by walking.” Struct. Eng. 81 (6): 20–27.
Eriksson, P. E. 1994. “Vibration of low-frequency floors—Dynamic forces and response prediction.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Dynamics in Design, Chalmers Univ. of Technology.
Griffin, M. J. 1984. “Vibration dose values for whole-body vibration: Some examples.” In Proc., United Kingdom Informal Group Meeting on Human Response to Vibration, 244–263. Edinburgh, UK: Heriot-Watts Univ.
Griffin, M. J. 1986. “Evaluation of vibration with respect to human response.” In Proc., Society of Automotive Engineers Int. Congress and Exposition, 11–33. Troy, MI: SAE International.
Griffin, M. J. 1990. Handbook of human vibration. London: Academic.
Griffin, M. J. 2007. “Predicting the feeling of vibration in buildings.” Proc. Inst. Acoust. 29 (2): 1–15.
Griffin, M. J., and E. M. Whitham. 1980a. “Discomfort produced by impulsive whole-body vibration.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68 (5): 1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385121.
Griffin, M. J., and E. M. Whitham. 1980b. “Time dependency of whole-body vibration discomfort.” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68 (5): 1522–1523. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385078.
Howarth, H. V. C., and M. J. Griffin. 1988. “Human response to simulated intermittent railway-induced building vibration.” J. Sound Vib. 120 (2): 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(88)90453-1.
Howarth, H. V. C., and M. J. Griffin. 1990. “The relative importance of noise and vibration from railways.” Appl. Ergon. 21 (2): 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(90)90135-K.
Howarth, H. V. C., and M. J. Griffin. 1991. “Subjective reaction to vertical mechanical shocks of various waveforms.” J. Sound Vib. 147 (3): 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(91)90488-6.
ISO. 1997. Mechanical vibration and shock—Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—Part 1: General requirements. ISO 2631-1. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2003. Mechanical vibration and shock—Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—Part 2: Vibration in buildings (1Hz to 80 Hz). ISO 2631-2:2003. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2007. Bases for design of structures-serviceability of buildings and walkways against vibrations. ISO 10137. Geneva: ISO.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1989. Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration—Part 2: Continuous and shock-induced vibration in buildings (1Hz to 80 Hz). ISO 2631-2:1989. Geneva: ISO.
Murray, T. M., D. E. Allen, and E. E. Ungar. 2016. Floor vibrations due to human activities. Chicago: AISC/CISC.
NBCC (National Research Council of Canada). 2010. User’s guide—National building code of Canada: Structural commentaries—Commentary D: Deflection and vibration criteria for serviceability and fatigue limit states. Ottawa: Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes—National Research Council of Canada.
Pavic, A. 1999. “Vibration serviceability of long-span cast in-site concrete floors.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, Univ. of Sheffield.
Rasmussen, G. 1982. “Human body vibration exposure and its measurements.” Bruel Kjaer Tech. Rev. 1: 3–31.
Reynolds, P. 2000. “The effects of raised access flooring on the vibrational performance of long-span concrete floors.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, Univ. of Sheffield.
Reynolds, P., and A. Pavic. 2006. “Vibration performance of a large cantilever grandstand during an international football match.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 20 (3): 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:3(202).
Salyards, K. A., and L. M. Hanagan. 2010. “Evaluation of vibration assessment criteria and their application to stadium serviceability.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (2): 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000088.
Setareh, M. 2010. “Vibration serviceability of a building floor structure. I: Dynamic testing and computer modeling.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (6): 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000134.
Setareh, M. 2011. “A study of the Verrazano-Narrows bridge movements during a New York City marathon.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (1): 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000130.
Setareh, M. 2013. “Office floor vibrations: Evaluation and assessment.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build. 167 (3): 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.11.00088.
Setareh, M. 2016. “Vibration serviceability issues of slender footbridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (11): 04016084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000951.
Shoenberger, R. W. 1976. “Comparison of the subjective intensity of sinusoidal, multifrequency, and random whole-body vibration.” Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 47 (8): 856–862.
Smith, A. L., S. J. Hicks, and P. J. Devine. 2009. Design of floors for vibration: A new approach. Barkshire, UK: The Steel Construction Institute.
Widjaja, T. R. 2004. “Vibration transmission between two nominally identical building floors.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, Univ. of Sheffield.
Wyatt, T. A. 1989. Design guide on the vibration of floors. Watford, UK: The Steel Construction Institute.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 34Issue 4August 2020

History

Received: Sep 17, 2019
Accepted: Jan 13, 2020
Published online: May 18, 2020
Published in print: Aug 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 18, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mehdi Setareh, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, School of Architecture and Design and Founder and Director of Vibration Testing Laboratory, Virginia Tech, 165 Inventive Lane, Blacksburg, VA 24061. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share