Technical Papers
May 31, 2019

Seismic Performance and Recovery Modeling of Natural Gas Networks at the Community Level Using Building Demand

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 33, Issue 4

Abstract

Earthquakes can substantially disrupt the operation of critical lifelines in a community, particularly water, gas, and other below-ground infrastructure. The damage that occurs to lifelines in a community from an earthquake can, in turn, have a substantial impact, resulting in social and economic disruption. Furthermore, the duration of the loss in functionality of lifelines is a key factor in the economic disruption that results from an earthquake. In this study, a virtual community known as Centerville was subjected to earthquakes of varying intensity, each having the same assigned point source location, using a well-known attenuation model in order to examine the restoration of communities in the aftermath of an earthquake. The virtual community model being studied has the essential physical components that describe a community, but the focus of this paper is the natural gas network, which is composed of a processing plant, compressor stations, city gate stations, district regulating stations, and buried pipelines. Based on the level of damage that occurred to the network components and their connectivity (topology) throughout the community, the functionality of supplier nodes is assessed using Monte Carlo simulation, and functionality curves are presented for the community’s natural gas network. Notably, the effect of the industrial makeup of a community on its natural gas recovery following an earthquake, as well as the influence of replacing conventional steel pipes with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) ductile pipelines, is examined. As expected, the ability of the HDPE pipe to reduce the network recovery time is substantial and is quantifiable at the community level using the approach presented herein.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (Grant No. 70NANB15H044). This support is gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIST or the Department of Commerce.

References

Adachi, T., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2008. “Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: Effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93 (1): 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.10.014.
ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). 2001. “Seismic fragility formulations for water systems. Part 1: Guideline.” Accessed April 1, 2001. http://www.americanlifelinesalliance.org/.
Bocchini, P., A. Decò, and D. M. Frangopol. 2012. “Probabilistic functionality recovery model for resilience analysis.” In Bridge maintenance, safety, management, resilience and sustainability, edited by F. Biodini. London: Taylor & Francis.
Bruneau, M., et al. 2003. “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.” Earthquake Spectra 19 (4): 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497.
Çagnan, Z., R. Davidson, and S. Guikema. 2004. “Post-earthquake restoration modeling of electric power systems.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1–6. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Spectra.
Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2014. “NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (3): 1087–1115. https://doi.org/10.1193/062913EQS175M.
Chang, L., and J. Song. 2007. “Matrix-based system reliability analysis of urban infrastructure networks: A case study of MLGW natural gas network.” In Proc., 5th China-Japan-US Trilateral Symp. on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Choo, Y. W., T. H. Abdoun, M. J. O’Rourke, and D. Ha. 2007. “Remediation for buried pipeline systems under permanent ground deformation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 27 (12): 1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.04.002.
Cornell, C. A. 1968. “Engineering seismic risk analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58 (5): 1583–1606.
Davidson, R. A., and Z. Çağnan. 2004. “Restoration modeling of lifeline systems.” In Research progress and accomplishments. Buffalo, NY: Univ. at Buffalo, State Univ. of New York.
Ditlevsen, O., and P. Bjerager. 1986. “Methods of structural systems reliability.” Struct. Saf. 3 (3–4): 195–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(86)90004-4.
Ellingwood, B. R., H. Cutler, P. Gardoni, W. G. Peacock, J. W. van de Lindt, and N. Wang. 2016. “The Centerville Virtual Community: A fully integrated decision model of interacting physical and social infrastructure systems.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 1 (3–4): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2016.1255000.
Esposito, S. 2011. Systemic seismic risk analysis of gas distribution networks. Naples, Italy: Univ. of Naples Federico.
Esposito, S., I. Iervolino, A. d’Onofrio, A. Santo, F. Cavalieri, and P. Franchin. 2015. “Simulation-based seismic risk assessment of gas distribution networks.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 30 (7): 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12105.
FEMA. 2003. “Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model.” HAZUS-MH 2.1 technical manual, 1–699. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Folga, S. M. 2007. Natural gas pipeline technology overview. Lemont, IL: Argonne National Laboratory.
Gardoni, P., K. M. Mosalam, and A. Der Kiureghian. 2003. “Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges.” J. Earthquake Eng. 7 (spec01): 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246903001024.
Guidotti, R., H. Chmielewski, V. Unnikrishnan, P. Gardoni, T. McAllister, and J. van de Lindt. 2016. “Modeling the resilience of critical infrastructure: The role of network dependencies.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 1 (3–4): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2016.1254999.
Han, Z. Y., and W. G. Weng. 2011. “Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network.” J. Hazard. Mater. 189 (1–2): 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.067.
Jeon, S. S., and T. D. O’Rourke. 2005. “Northridge earthquake effects on pipelines and residential buildings.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95 (1): 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040020.
Jia, G., A. Tabandeh, and P. Gardoni. 2017. “Life-cycle analysis of engineering systems: Modeling deterioration, instantaneous reliability, and resilience.” In Springer series in reliability engineering. New York: Springer.
Kidnay, A. J., W. R. Parrish, and D. G. McCartney. 2011. Fundamentals of natural gas processing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lanzano, G., E. Salzano, F. S. De Magistris, and G. Fabbrocino. 2013. “Seismic vulnerability of natural gas pipelines.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 117: 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.019.
Lanzano, G., E. Salzano, F. Santucci de Magistris, and G. Fabbrocino. 2014. “Seismic vulnerability of gas and liquid buried pipelines.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 28: 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2013.03.010.
Liu, W., Z. Li, Z. Song, and J. Li. 2018. “Seismic reliability evaluation of gas supply networks based on the probability density evolution method.” Struct. Saf. 70: 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.10.001.
Markowski, A. S., and M. S. Mannan. 2009. “Fuzzy logic for piping risk assessment (pfLOPA).” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 22 (6): 921–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.06.011.
Masoomi, H., M. R. Ameri, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2018. “Wind performance enhancement strategies for wood-frame buildings.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (3): 04018024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001172.
Masoomi, H., and J. W. van de Lindt. 2017. “Restoration and functionality assessment of a community subjected to tornado hazard.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (3): 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1354030.
Masoomi, H., J. W. van de Lindt, M. R. Ameri, T. Q. Do, and B. M. Webb. 2019. “Combined wind-wave-surge hurricane-induced damage prediction for buildings.” J. Struct. Eng. 145 (1): 04018227. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002241.
Memari, M., N. Attary, H. Masoomi, H. Mahmoud, J. van de Lindt, S. Pilkington, and M. R. Ameri. 2018. “Minimal building fragility portfolio for physics-based damage assessment of communities subjected to tornadoes.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (7): 04018072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002047.
Omidvar, B., and H. K. Kivi. 2016. “Multi-hazard failure probability analysis of gas pipelines for earthquake shaking, ground failure and fire following earthquake.” Nat. Hazards 82 (1): 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2214-3.
O’Rourke, M., and G. Ayala. 1993. “Pipeline damage due to wave propagation.” J. Geotech. Eng. 119 (9): 1490–1498.
O’Rourke, M., and E. Deyoe. 2004. “Seismic damage to segmented buried pipe.” Earthquake Spectra. 20 (4): 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1808143.
O’Rourke, T. D., S. S. Jeon, S. Toprak, M. Cubrinovski, M. Hughes, S. Van Ballegooy, and D. Bouziou. 2014. “Earthquake response of underground pipeline networks in Christchurch, NZ.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (1): 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1193/030413EQS062M.
O’Rourke, T. D., S. S. Jeon, S. Toprak, M. Cubrinovski, and J. Jung. 2012. “Underground lifeline system performance during the Canterbury earthquake sequence.” In Proc., 15th world Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Spectra.
Ouyang, M., L. Dueñas-Osorio, and X. Min. 2012. “A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems.” Struct. Saf. 36: 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004.
Petersen, M. D., T. E. Dawson, R. Chen, T. Cao, C. J. Wills, D. P. Schwartz, and A. D. Frankel. 2011. “Fault displacement hazard for strike-slip faults.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 101 (2): 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100035.
Pitilakis, K., H. Crowley, and A. M. Kaynia. 2014. SYNER-G: Typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk. Berlin: Springer.
PPD-21 (Presidential Policy Directive). 2013. Presidential policy directive/PPD-21: Critical infrastructure security and resilience. Washington, DC: White House.
Praks, P., V. Kopustinskas, and M. Masera. 2017. “Monte-Carlo-based reliability and vulnerability assessment of a natural gas transmission system due to random network component failures.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 2 (3): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1294881.
Ramachandran, V., S. K. Long, T. Shoberg, S. Corns, and H. J. Carlo. 2015. “Framework for modeling urban restoration resilience time in the aftermath of an extreme event.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 16 (4): 04015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000184.
Sharma, N., A. Tabandeh, and P. Gardoni. 2017. “Resilience analysis: A mathematical formulation to model resilience of engineering systems.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 3 (2): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1345257.
Titi, A., F. Biondini, and D. M. Frangopol. 2015. “Seismic resilience of deteriorating concrete structures.” In Proc., Structures Congress. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Urlainis, A., I. M. Shohet, and R. Levy. 2015. “Probabilistic risk assessment of oil and gas infrastructures for seismic extreme events.” Procedia Eng. 123: 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.112.
van de Lindt, J. W., B. R. Ellingwood, T. McAllister, P. Gardoni, D. T. Cox, H. Cutler, and W. G. Peacock. 2015. “Computational environment for modeling and enhancing community resilience: Introducing the center for risk-based community resilience planning.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Performance-based and Life-Cycle Structural Engineering (PLSE 2015), 1154–1163. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Xie, X., M. D. Symans, M. J. O’Rourke, T. H. Abdoun, T. D. O’Rourke, M. C. Palmer, and H. E. Stewart. 2013. “Numerical modeling of buried HDPE pipelines subjected to normal faulting: A case study.” Earthquake Spectra 29 (2): 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000137.
Yuhua, D., and Y. Datao. 2005. “Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis.” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 18 (2): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2004.12.003.
Zulfikar, C., M. Erdik, E. Safak, H. Biyikoglu, and C. Kariptas. 2016. “Istanbul natural gas network rapid response and risk mitigation system.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 14 (9): 2565–2578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9964-x.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 33Issue 4August 2019

History

Received: Jun 14, 2018
Accepted: Jan 11, 2019
Published online: May 31, 2019
Published in print: Aug 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Oct 31, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammad R. Ameri, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Center for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. Email: [email protected]
John W. van de Lindt, F.ASCE [email protected]
Harold H. Short Endowed Chair Professor and Co-Director, Center of Excellence for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share