Technical Papers
Apr 11, 2018

Optimal FM Strategy for Commercial Office Buildings Using Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 32, Issue 3

Abstract

For owners of aged buildings, considerable attention needs to be devoted to efficient facility management (FM) to extend building life and achieve life-cycle cost savings. The fundamental step in this is to identify the level of FM performance. Few studies have focused on the quantitative investigation of FM performance, and there has been minimal research on the methodology required to arrive at the optimal strategy. The purpose of this study is to present a systematic algorithm that allows FM practitioners to evaluate their performance in an objective manner. In addition, the authors have formulated a FM performance evaluation index in conjunction with the fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. The framework for this evaluation includes 12 critical success factors and 18 key performance indicators according to 4 balanced scorecard perspectives. A case study on a commercial office building was conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness and validity of the proposed methodology. The results reveal an optimal FM strategy for the building recommended using the novel algorithm, and its effectiveness is validated by FM experts. The proposed method will allow industry practitioners to quantitatively evaluate FM performance and make better decisions in selecting the optimal management strategy. Furthermore, the findings can advance the body of knowledge on building performance evaluation in view of quantitative metrics development.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program, through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (2015R1A2A2A01005242). The authors are grateful to all respondents and interviewees who participated in the survey and interview.

References

Amaratunga, D., and D. Baldry. 2002. “Performance measurement in facilities management organisations: Transition from measurement to management.” In Proc., CIB Global Symp., 206–223. Delft, Netherlands: International Council for Building.
Atkin, B., and A. Brooks. 2015. Total facility management. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
Au-Yong, C. P., A. S. Ali, and F. Ahmad. 2014. “Participative mechanisms to improve office maintenance performance and customer satisfaction.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (4): 04014103.
Bassioni, H. A., A. D. F. Price, and T. M. Hassan. 2004. “Performance measurement in construction.” J. Manag. Eng. 20 (2): 42–50.
Cha, H. S., and C. K. Kim. 2011. “Quantitative approach for project performance measurement on building construction in South Korea.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 15 (8): 1319–1328.
Chan, J. H., D. W. Chan, A. P. Chan, P. T. Lam, and J. F. Yeung. 2011. “Developing a fuzzy risk assessment model for guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in construction.” J. Facil. Manage. 9 (1): 34–51.
Chow, L. K., and S. T. Ng. 2007. “A fuzzy gap analysis model for evaluating the performance of engineering consultants.” Autom. Constr. 16 (4): 425–435.
Hallowell, M. R., and J. A. Gambatese. 2009. “Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi method to CEM research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (1): 99–107.
Haponava, T., and S. Al-Jibouri. 2011. “Proposed system for measuring project performance using process-based key performance indicators.” J. Manage. Eng. 28 (2): 140–149.
Hu, Y., A. P. Chan, Y. Le, Y. Xu, and M. Shan. 2016. “Developing a program organization performance index for delivering construction megaprojects in China: Fuzzy synthetic evaluation analysis.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (4): 05016007.
Inayat, A., H. Melhem, and A. Esmaeily. 2014. “Critical success factors in an agency construction management environment.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (1): 06014010.
Lai, J. H. 2014. “Maintenance performance: Examination of the computer-aided maintenance data of a large commercial building.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (4): 04014118.
Leedy, P. D., and J. E. Ormrod. 2005. Practical research: Planning and design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Lepkova, N., and R. Uselis. 2013. “Development of a quality criteria system for facilities management services in Lithuania.” Procedia Eng. 57: 697–706.
Liu, J., Q. Li, and Y. Wang. 2013. “Risk analysis in ultra-deep scientific drilling project—A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach.” Int. J. Project Manage. 31 (3): 449–458.
Lo, S. M. 1999. “A fire safety assessment system for existing buildings.” Fire Technol. 35 (2): 131–152.
Lucko, G., and E. M. Rojas. 2009. “Research validation: Challenges and opportunities in the construction domain.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (1): 127–135.
Mukelas, M. F. M., E. A. Zawawi, S. N. Kamaruzzaman, Z. Ithnin, and S. H. Zulkarnain. 2012. “A review of critical success factors in building maintenance management of local authority in Malaysia.” In Proc., IEEE Symp. on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications, 653–657. New York: IEEE.
O’leary, D. E. 1991. “Design, development and validation of expert systems: A survey of developers.” In Validation, verification, and test of knowledge-based systems, 3–19. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Rodriguez, R. R., J. J. Saiz, A. O. Bas, and M. J. Saez. 2010. “Identifying relationships between key performance indicators.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management, 151–159. Donostia, Spain.
Rondeau, E. P., R. K. Brown, and P. D. Lapides. 2012. Facility management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Roper, K. O., and R. P. Payant. 2009. The facility management handbook. New York: AMACOM.
Sapri, M., and M. Pitt. 2005. “Performance measurement in facilities management; state of knowledge.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., 21st Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) Conf., 431–440. London: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Wheelen, T. L., and J. D. Hunger. 2017. Strategic management and business policy. 15th ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Xu, Y., A. P. Chan, and J. F. Yeung. 2010. “Developing a fuzzy risk allocation model for PPP projects in China.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 894–903.
Yeung, J. F., A. P. Chan, D. W. Chan, and L. K. Li. 2007. “Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: A Delphi study.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 25 (12): 1219–1237.
Yoon, J. H., and H. S. Cha. 2016. “An empirical study of facility management performance on commercial office building in South Korea.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Civil Engineering and Urban Planning (CEUP). Singapore: World Scientific.
Yüksel, İ., and M. Dağdeviren. 2010. “Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm.” Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2): 1270–1278.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 32Issue 3June 2018

History

Received: May 23, 2017
Accepted: Dec 18, 2017
Published online: Apr 11, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 11, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jong Han Yoon [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Ajou Univ., Woncheon-Dong, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon 443-749, Korea. Email: [email protected]
Hee Sung Cha, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Ajou Univ., Woncheon-Dong, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon 443-749, Korea (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share