Technical Papers
Feb 2, 2018

Deterioration Assessment of Infrastructure Using Fuzzy Logic and Image Processing Algorithm

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 32, Issue 2

Abstract

The safety and serviceability of civil infrastructures have to be ensured either as part of a periodic inspection program or immediately following a given hazardous event. The use of digital imaging techniques to identify the deformed or deteriorated surfaces of structures is a substantial area of research and aims to investigate a number of unknown parameters, including damage quantification and condition rating. This manuscript illustrates the integration of previously developed fuzzy logic–based decision-making tools with the currently developed image processing algorithm to quantify the damage for the condition rating of civil infrastructures. The proposed integrated framework exploits visual specifics of different elements of the infrastructure to perform automated evaluation of structural anomalies such as cracks and surface degradation. Two different image segmentation tools, (1) bottom hat transform and (2) hue, saturation, color (HSV) thresholding, are applied to identify the surface defects. The developed image processing software is used with the fuzzy set framework proposed in the previous research to gauge the damage indices due to various deterioration types like corrosion, alkali aggregate reaction, freeze–thaw attack, sulfate attack, acid attack or loading, fatigue, shrinkage, and honeycombing. Case studies of a long-span bridge and a warehouse building are illustrated for concept validation. The refined comprehensive method is presented as a graphical user interface (GUI) to facilitate the real-time condition assessment of civil infrastructures.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial assistance extended by Department of Science and Technology, India [DST/INT/Canada/IC—IMPACTS/P-3/2015 (G)] and India-Canada IMPACTS, Centre of Excellence, CANADA under Indo-Canada collaborative project scheme is thankfully acknowledged. We would also like to thank Southern Railways, India, for their onsite technical support.

References

Arliansyah, J., Maruyama, T., and Takahashi, O. (2003). “A development of fuzzy pavement condition assessment.” Japan Soc. Civ. Eng., 2003(746), 275–285.
Blockley, D. I. (1975). “Predicting the likelihood of structural accidents.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 59(4), 659–668.
Blockley, D. I. (1977). “Analysis of structural failures.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., 62(1), 51–74.
Brown, C. B., and Yao, J. T. P. (1983). “Fuzzy sets and structural engineering.” J. Struct. Eng., 1211–1225.
Chang, P., Flatau, C., and Liu, S. C. (2003). “Review paper: Health monitoring of civil infrastructure.” Struct. Health Monitoring, 2(3), 257–267.
Dong, W., and Shah, H. (1987). “Vertex method for computing functions of fuzzy variables.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 24(1), 65–78.
Dong, Y., Song, R., and Liu, H. (2003). “Bridges structural health monitoring and deterioration detection—Synthesis of knowledge and technology.”, Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK.
Furuta, H., Hirokane, M., Tanaka, S., and Mikumo, Y. (2000). “A study of technology for diagnosing bridge soundness by using portable computer.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, International Society for Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Tampere, Finland, 1037–1044.
Fwa, T. F., Liu, S. B., and Teng, K. J. (2003). “Airport pavement condition rating and maintenance-needs assessment using fuzzy logic.” Proc., Airfield Pavements: Challenges and New Technologies, ASCE, Reston, VA, 29–38.
Hadipriono, F. C. (1988). “Fuzzy set concepts for evaluating performance of constructed facilities.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 209–225.
Hathout, I. (1993). “Damage assessment of existing transmission towers using fuzzy weighted averages.” Proc., Second Int. Symp. on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, IEEE, New York, 573–580.
Ikhlas, A.-Q., Abudayyeh, O., and Kelly, M. E. (2003). “Analysis of edge-detection techniques for crack identification in bridges.” J. Comp. Civ. Eng., 255–263.
Jain, K. K., and Bhattacharjee, B. (2012a). “Application of fuzzy concepts to the visual assessment of deteriorating reinforced concrete structures.” J. Const. Eng. Manage., 399–408.
Jain, K. K., and Bhattacharjee, B. (2012b). “Visual inspection and condition assessment of structures [VICAS]: An innovative tool for structural condition assessment.” Int. J. 3R’s, 3(1), 349–357.
Jahanshahi, M. R., Kelly, J. S., Masrim, S. F., and Sukhatme, G. S. (2009). “A survey and evaluation of promising approaches for automatic image-based defect detection of bridge structures.” J. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 5(6), 455–486.
Jahanshahi, M. R., and Masri, S. F. (2012). “Adaptive vision-based crack detection using 3D scene reconstruction for condition assessment of structures.” Autom. Constr., 22, 567–576.
Jahanshahi, M. R., and Masri, S. F. (2013). “A new methodology for non-contact accurate crack width measurement through photogrammetry for automated structural safety evaluation.” Smart Mater. Struct., 22(3), 035019.
Kim, Y. M., Kim, C. K., and Hong, S. G. (2006). “Fuzzy based state assessment for reinforced concrete building structures.” Eng. Struct., 28(9), 1286–1297.
Lattanzi, D., and Miller, G. R. (2014). “Robust automated concrete damage detection algorithms for field applications.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 253–262.
Liang, M. T., Wu, J. H., and Liang, C. H. (2001). “Multiple layer fuzzy evaluation for existing reinforced concrete bridges.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 144–159.
Madau, D. P., and Feldkamp, L. A. (1996). “Influence value defuzzification method.” Fuzzy Syst., 3, 1819–1824.
Mamdani, E. H., and Assilian, S. (1975). “An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller.” Int. J. Man Mach. Stud., 7(1), 1–13.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Mitra, G., Jain, K. K., and Bhattacharjee, B. (2010). “Condition assessment of corrosion-distressed reinforced concrete buildings using fuzzy logic.” J. Perform Constr. Facil., 562–570.
Nguyen, H.-N., Kam, T.-Y., and Cheng, P-Y. (2012). “A novel automatic concrete surface crack identification using isotropic undecimated wavelet transform.” Intelligent signal processing communication systems, IEEE, New York, 766–711.
Ogawa, H., Fu, K. S., and Yao, J. T. P. (1984). “An expert system for structure damage assessment.” Pattern Recogn. Lett., 2(6), 427–432.
PCA (Portland Cement Association). (2002). “Types and causes of concrete deterioration.” IS 536.01, Glenview, IL.
Prasanna, P., Dana, K., Gucunski, N., and Basily, B. (2012). “Computer-vision based crack detection and analysis.” SPIE smart structures and materials + nondestructive evaluation and health monitoring, International Society for Optics and Photonics, Bellingham, WA, 834542.
Rose, P., Aaron, B., Tamir, D. E., Lu, L., and Hu, J. (2014). “Supervised computer-vision based sensing of concrete bridges for crack-detection and assessment.” Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Vol. 14, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 3857.
Ross, T. J., Sorensen, H. C., Savage, S. J., and Carson, J. M. (1990). “DAPS: Expert system for structural damage assessment.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 327–348.
Sankarasrinivasan, S., Balasubramanian, E., Karthik, K., Chandrasekar, U., and Gupta, R. (2015). “Health monitoring of civil structures with integrated UAV and image processing system.” 11 Int. Conf. on Image & Signal Processing, Elsevier Procedia Computer Science, Bangalore, India, 508–515.
Sasmal, S., Ramanjaneyulu, K., Gopalakrishnan, S., and Lakshmanan, N. (2006). “Fuzzy logic based condition rating of existing reinforced concrete bridges.” J. Perform Constr. Facil., 261–273.
Sasmal, S., and Ramanjaneyulu, K. (2008). “Condition evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges using fuzzy based analytic hierarchy approach.” Expert Syst. Appl., 35(3), 1430–1443.
Savage, S. J., Ross, T., Sorensen, H., Carson, J., and Satterthwaite, B. (1988). “Development of a rule-based structural damage assessment code.”, Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM.
Souflis, C., and Grivas, D. A. (1986). “Fuzzy set approach to linguistic seismic load and damage assessments.” J. Eng. Mech., 605–618.
Torok, M., Golparvar-Fard, M., and Kochersberger, K. (2014). “Image-based automated 3D crack detection for post-disaster building assessment.” J. Comp. Civ. Eng., A4014004.
Vazquez, M. A., Galan, E., Guerrero, M. A., and Ortiz, P. (2011). “Digital image processing of weathered stone caused by efflorescence: A tool for mapping and evaluation of stone decay.” Constr. Build. Mater., 25(4), 1603–1611.
Vidal, M., Ostra, M., Imaz, N., García-Lecina, E., and Ubide, C. (2016). “Analysis of SEM digital images to quantify crack network pattern area in chromium electro deposit.” Surf. Coat. Tech., 285, 289–297.
Wang, Y. M., and Elhag, T. M. S. (2007). “A fuzzy group decision making approach for bridge risk assessment.” Comput. Ind. Eng., 53(1), 137–148.
Yamaguchi, T., and Hashimoto, S. (2010). “Fast crack detection method for large-size concrete surface images using percolation-based image processing.” Mach. Vision Appl., 21(5), 797–809.
Yamaguchi, T., Nakamura, S., Saegusa, R., and Hashimoto, S. (2008). “Image-based crack detection for real concrete surfaces.” IEEE Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng., 3(1), 128–135.
Yao, R., and Pakzad, S. N. (2012). “Autoregressive statistical pattern recognition algorithms for damage detection in civil structures.” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 31, 355–368.
Zhao, J., and Bose, B. K. (2002). “Evaluation of membership functions for fuzzy logic controlled induction motor drive.” 28th Annual Conf. on IEE Industrial Electronics Society, IEEE, New York, 229–234.
Zou, Q., Cao, Y., Li, Q., Mao, Q., and Wang, S. (2012). “Crack tree: Automatic crack detection from pavement images.” Pattern Recogn. Lett., 33(3), 227–238.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 32Issue 2April 2018

History

Received: Apr 16, 2017
Accepted: Oct 30, 2017
Published online: Feb 2, 2018
Published in print: Apr 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jul 2, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Haran Pragalath [email protected]
Postdoctorate Researcher, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Vel Tech Univ., Chennai, Tamilnadu 600062, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Sankarasrinivasan Seshathiri [email protected]
Research Associate, Centre for Autonomous System Research, Vel Tech Univ., Chennai, Tamilnadu 600062, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Ph.D. Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 2Y2 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3306-7634. E-mail: [email protected]
Balasubramanian Esakki [email protected]
Associate Professor, Centre for Autonomous System Research, Vel Tech Univ., Chennai, Tamilnadu 600062, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Rishi Gupta [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3P6. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share