Passive Vibration Mitigation for Highway Sign Trusses Susceptible to Wind-Induced Vibrations
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 31, Issue 6
Abstract
Stockbridge-type tuned-mass dampers are commonly used in highway sign and traffic signal support structures throughout the U.S. to reduce wind-induced and truck gust–induced vibrations. Effectiveness of these dampers in mitigating excessive structural vibrations, and thereby preventing connection failures and the development of fatigue cracks in tubular members, is highly dependent on the dynamic characteristics of both the damper and the structure. In addition, the expected amplitude of vibration should be taken into account when designing damping devices for a given structure because damping is a function of both frequency and amplitude of structural motion. The practice of optimizing the damper design for specific structures, however, is very limited, and the same number and configuration of dampers (with identical dynamic parameters) are universally used in many structures, irrespective of their span length and weight. To achieve optimal damping performance for highway sign trusses, this paper investigates the dynamic behavior of dampers through a series of laboratory experiments and a simplified analytical model. The testing and analysis results suggest significant improvement in vibration response and fatigue performance of structures over the currently installed dampers by implementing a few simple recommendations for damper selection.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) as part of Contract No. IHR-R37 “Evaluation of Aluminum Highway Sign Truss Designs and Standards for Wind and Truck Gust Loadings.” The contents of this paper reflect the view of the writers, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of IDOT or the Federal Highway Administration, and this paper does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
References
AASHTO. (2001). Standard specifications for structural supports for highway signs, luminaires, and traffic signals, 4th Ed., Washington, DC.
AFL Telecommunications. (2012). “Motion control.” ⟨https://www.aflglobal.com/productionFiles/resources/catalogs/Transmission-and-Distribution/05-Motion-Control-Catalog.pdf⟩ (Jun. 8, 2016).
Alcoa Conductor Accessories. (1992). Substation accessories section ACA20, Duncan, SC.
Bahtovska, E. (2000). “The energy balance for damped wind-excited vibrations.” Facta Universitatis, Mech. Eng., 1(7), 769–773.
Cook, R. A., Bloomquist, D., Richard, D. S., and Kalajian, M. A. (2001). “Damping of cantilevered traffic signal structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 1476–1483.
Foutch, D. A., Rice, J. A., LaFave, J., Valdovinos, S., and Kim, T. W. (2006). “Evaluation of aluminum highway sign trusses and standards for wind and truck gust loading.”, Illinois Dept. of Transportation, Springfield, IL.
Ginal, S. (2003). “Fatigue performance of full-span sign support structures considering truck-induced gust and natural wind pressures.” M.S. thesis, Marquette Univ., Milwaukee.
Ginsberg, J. H. (2001). Mechanical and structural vibrations: Theory and applications, 1st Ed., Wiley, New York.
Hamilton III, H. R., Riggs, G. S., and Puckett, J. A. (2000). “Increased damping in cantilevered traffic signal structures.” J. Struct. Eng., 530–537.
IDOT (Illinois Department of Transportation). (2012). Sign structures manual, Bureau of Bridges and Structures, Springfield, IL.
LabVIEW [Computer software], National Instruments, Austin, TX.
Lengel, J. S., and Sharp, M. L. (1969). Vibration and damping of aluminum overhead sign structures, 51–60.
Pantelides, C., Nadauld, J., and Cercone, L. (2003). “Repair of cracked aluminum overhead sign structures with glass fiber reinforced polymer composites.” J. Compos. Constr., 118–126.
Rice, J. A., and Foutch, D. A. (2006). “Passive damping strategies for highway sign structures.” Proc., Fourth World Conf. on Structural Control and Monitoring, International Association for Structural Control and Monitoring, Los Angeles.
Rice, J. A., Foutch, D. A., LaFave, J. M., and Valdovinos, S. (2012). “Field testing and analysis of aluminum highway sign trusses.” Eng. Struct., 34(Jan), 173–186.
Rice, J. A., LaFave, J., and Mehuys, C. H. (2008). “End connection effects on vortex shedding susceptibility of aluminum truss tubular web members.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 297–304.
Sauter, D., and Hagedorn, P. (2002). “On the hysteresis of wire cables in Stockbridge dampers.” Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 37(8), 1453–1459.
Sharp, M. L. (1993). Behavior and design of aluminum structures, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Vecchiarelli, J., Currie, I. G., and Havard, D. G. (2000). “Computational analysis of aeolian conductor vibration with a Stockbridge-type damper.” J. Fluids Struct., 14(4), 489–509.
Wagner, H., Ramamurti, V., Sastry, R. V. R., and Hartmann, K. (1973). “Dynamics of Stockbridge dampers.” J. Sound Vib., 30(2), 207–220.
Zalewski, B., and Huckelbridge, A. A. (2005). “Dynamic load environment of bridge-mounted sign support structures.” Ohio Dept. of Transportation, Columbus, OH.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 8, 2016
Accepted: Mar 28, 2017
Published online: Jul 26, 2017
Published in print: Dec 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Dec 26, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.