Live-Load Performance Evaluation of Historic Covered Timber Bridges in the United States
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30, Issue 4
Abstract
The National Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program (NHCBP), sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), was established to preserve the covered timber bridge structures that were constructed in the early 1800s. Today, many of the approximately 880 covered timber bridges still in existence in the United States are closed to vehicular traffic; furthermore, a large percentage of the remaining bridges open to traffic are restricted by load postings. Unfortunately, there are no current load-rating standards for covered timber bridges, so engineers do not have many resources at their disposal to reliably understand the behavior of these complex structures. As a result, the estimated load postings and/or ratings are often too conservative. To better understand the live-load performance of covered timber bridges and to develop improved criteria for their load ratings, a series of live-load tests were performed on 11 single-span, historic covered timber bridges. This paper explains the field testing conducted on all of the bridges, and makes recommendations for the conduct of other similar tests. The tests consisted of installing a network of multiple displacement and strain sensors on the structures, and monitoring global displacements and member strains at various cross sections during passage of a known test. The vehicle used in the testing met the load restrictions in place at the time of testing. The results of this work serve as a basis for instrumentation and field testing, to investigate the live-load performance on such bridges. This paper outlines the field-testing methods and summarizes the results from the testing of all 11 bridges. Based on the field-testing methods, a field-testing protocol is recommended for the live-load testing of historic covered timber bridges. Feasibility of the recommended protocol is also evaluated using a finite-element model analysis for a selected bridge among the tested bridges.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration and the USDA Forest Products Laboratory (FPL) under the National Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program. The authors especially thank Doug Rammer from the FPL for his cooperation and assistance during the field testing of the covered bridges.
References
AASHTO. (2010). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2011). AASHTO manual for bridge evaluation, Washington, DC.
Davids, W., Dagher, H., Richie, M., and Sanchez, O. (2005). “Fatigue of glulam beams with fiber-reinforced polymer tension reinforcing.” Forest Prod. J., 55(1), 93–101.
Fanous, F., May, J., and Wipf, T. (2011). “Development of live-load distribution factors for glued-laminated timber girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 179–187.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2005). FHWA covered bridge manual, McLean, VA.
Gilham, P. C., and Ritter, M. (1994). Load distribution in longitudinal stringer-transverse deck timber bridges, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.
Hosteng, T., et al. (2015). Covered bridge rating through load testing—final report, USDA, Washington, DC.
Hosteng, T., Phares, B., Wipf, T., Ritter, M., and Wood, D. (2005). “Live load deflection performance of glued laminated timber girder bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1928, 174–182.
Lamar, D. M., and Schafer, B. W. (2004). “Structural analyses of two historic covered wooden bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 623–633.
Le, X., Kainz, J., Peterson, M. L., and Landisic, E. N. (1998). Smart timber bridges for in-situ evaluation, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.
Ritter, M. A. (1990). Timber bridges-design, construction, inspection, and maintenance, USDA, Washington, DC.
Sangree, R. H., and Schafer, B. W. (2008). “Field experiments and numerical models for the condition assessment of historic timber bridges: Case study.” J. Bridge Eng., 595–601.
Seo, J., Czaplewski, T. M., Kimn, J. H., and Hatfield, G. (2015). “Integrated structural health monitoring system and multi-regression models for determining load ratings for complex steel bridges.” Measurement, 75, 308–319.
Seo, J., and Hu, J.-W. (2015). “Influence of atypical vehicle types on girder distribution factors of secondary road steel-concrete composite bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04014064.
Seo, J., Phares, B., Lu, P., Wipf, T., and Dahlberg, J. (2013). “Bridge rating protocol using ambient trucks through structural health monitoring system.” Eng. Struct., 46, 569–580.
Seo, J., Phares, B., and Wipf, T. (2014). “Lateral live-load distribution characteristics of simply supported steel girder bridges loaded with implements of husbandry.” J. Bridge Eng., 04013021.
Spyrakos, C. C., Kemp, E. L., and Venkatareddy, R. (1999). “Seismic study of an historic covered bridge.” Eng. Struct., 21(9), 877–882.
STAAD Pro V8i [Computer software]. Bentley Systems, Exton, PA.
Thompson, R. J. H., Ansell, M. P., Bonfield, P. W., and Dinwoodie, J. M., (2002). “Fatigue in wood-based panels. Part 1: The strength variability and fatigue performance of OSB, chipboard and MDF.” Wood Sci. Technol., 36(3), 255–269.
Wacker, J. P., and Groenier, J. S. (2010). “Comparative analysis of design codes for timber bridges in Canada, the United States, and Europe.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2200, 163–168.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 7, 2015
Accepted: Oct 12, 2015
Published online: Dec 22, 2015
Discussion open until: May 22, 2016
Published in print: Aug 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.