Technical Notes
Jun 18, 2015

Performance Records System for Public Construction Contractors—Application of Smooth Roads Project

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30, Issue 3

Abstract

The capability of a construction contractor greatly affects the quality of public construction. Many countries are developing assessment methods for construction contractors and establishing assessment systems for contractor performance. This study investigates one innovation of the performance records system (PRS) for public construction contractors, established in Taiwan in 2010. The PRS provides performance records pertaining to the project management contractor, the supervision contractor, and the construction contractor who have taken part in public construction in the last 5 years. Moreover, to improve the quality of public construction, Taiwan has begun implementing the policy of the lowest tender with different qualities (LTDQ) since 2006. The LTDQ uses the performance records in the PRS as the essential criteria for awarding a contract. This study uses the smooth roads project (SRP) promoted in Taipei City between 2009 and 2013 as an interesting and representative case study to explore the LTDQ policy. The international roughness index (IRI) is used to represent the road evenness, thus rendering the construction capability of the contractor. A comparison between the road evenness after implementation of the LTDQ based on the PRS (2011–2013) and before the implementation (2009–2010) reveals that the overall evenness of road sections is significantly better and the overall deterioration amount of road evenness is lower. These findings verify the capability of the LTDQ based on the PRS to select construction contractors as well as its effectiveness in improving the quality of public construction, which are worthy of reference to the global construction industry.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study contains partial results of projects MOST 102-2221-E-197-037. The authors would like to express their appreciation to the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan for funding support. Thanks and appreciation are extended to the Taipei City government for providing IRI data.

References

Alarcón, L. F., and Mourgues, C. (2002). “Performance modeling for contractor selection.” J. Manage. Eng., 52–60.
Arslan, G. (2012). “Web-based contractor evaluation system for mass-housing projects in Turkey.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage., 18(3), 323–334.
Brown, R. S. (2009). An analysis of construction contractor performance evaluation system, Thesis, Dept. of the Air Force, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.
Butcher, D. C. A., and Sheehan, M. J. (2010). “Excellent contractor performance in the UK construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 17(1), 35–45.
El-Sawalhi, N., Eaton, D., and Rustom, R. (2007). “Contractor pre-qualification model: State-of-the-art.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 25(5), 465–474.
Feldman, M. (2006). “Best value in publicly funded projects: Contractor selection in two country GOB projects, research.” Florida International Univ., Research Institute on Social and Economic Policy, Miami, FL.
Gransberg, D. D. (2010). “Framework for performance-based contractor prequalification.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 46–54.
Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P. O., and Harris, F. C. (1995). “A review of contractor selection practices in the U.K. construction industry.” Build. Environ., 30(4), 553–561.
Jaselskis, E. J., and Russell, J. S. (1992). “Risk analysis approach to selection of contractor evaluation method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 814–821.
Lee, M. R., Ismail, S., and Hussaini, M. (2013). “Key performance indicator (KPI) of contractor on project performance for housing construction in Malaysia.” 1st Int. Conf. on Human Capital and Knowledge Management (HCKM 2013), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Lu, J. J., Zhu, C., and Pernia, J. (2003). “Performance evaluation of roughness measuring devices to measure ride number and international roughness index.”, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of South Florida, National Technical Information Service, Alexandria, VA.
Marceau, E., and Greener, J. (2012). “Contractor performance assessment reporting system (CPARS), past performance information retrieval system (PPIRS), and federal awardee performance & integrity information system (FAPIIS).” Defense Procurement eBusiness Conf., The Clarion Group, Cleveland Heights, OH.
Mohamed, S. (1996). “Benchmarking and improving construction productivity.” Benchmark. Quality Manage. Technol., 3(3), 50–58.
Nassar, K., and Hegab, M. (2008). “Evaluating contractor performance: Application to the UAE construction industry.” Proc., ASCE 5th Int. Engineering and Construction Conf. (IECC’5), Construction Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
Ng, S. T., Palaneeswaran, E., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2002). “A dynamic e-reporting system for contractor’s performance appraisal.” Adv. Eng. Softw., 33(6), 339–349.
Oliveira de Souza, R., Neto, S. D., and Muniz de Farias, M. (2006). “Statistical analysis between roughness indices and roughness prediction model using neural networks.” Federal Highway Administration, ASCE, National Technical Information Service, Alexandria, VA.
Palaneeswaran, E., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2000). “Contractor selection for design/build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 331–339.
PCC (Public Construction Commission), Taiwan. (2003). “The tender management system of public construction.” 〈http://cmdweb.pcc.gov.tw/pccms/owa/cmdmang.userin〉 (Aug. 16, 2014) (in Chinese).
PCC (Public Construction Commission), Taiwan. (2009a). “2009 public construction commission annual report.” 〈http://www.pcc.gov.tw/pccap2/FMGRfrontend/DownloadQuoteFile.do?fileCode=F2009060094〉 (Aug. 18, 2014).
PCC (Public Construction Commission), Taiwan. (2009b). “The government e-procurement website.” 〈http://web.pcc.gov.tw/pishtml/pisindex.html〉 (Aug. 16, 2014) (in Chinese).
PCC (Public Construction Commission), Taiwan. (2010). “The performance records system for public construction contractors.” 〈http://cmdweb.pcc.gov.tw/pccms/owa/pwksafe.statmenu〉 (Aug. 16, 2014) (in Chinese).
PCC (Public Construction Commission), Taiwan. (2011a). “2011 Public construction commission annual report.” 〈http://www.pcc.gov.tw/pccap2/FMGRfrontend/DownloadQuoteFile.do?fileCode=F2011050158〉 (Aug. 8, 2014).
PCC (Public Construction Commission), Taiwan. (2011b). “Government procurement act.” 〈http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=A0030057〉 (Sep. 6, 2014).
PCC (Public Construction Commission), Taiwan. (2012). “Enforcement rules of the government procurement act.” 〈http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=A0030058〉 (Sep. 6, 2014).
PCC (Public Construction Commission), Taiwan. (2014). “Gold medal for public construction quality.” 〈http://www.pcc.gov.tw/pccap2/BIZSfront/MenuContent.do?site=002&bid=BIZS_C09904125〉 (Sep. 8, 2014) (in Chinese).
Plebankiewicz, E. (2010). “Construction contractor prequalification from polish clients’ perspective.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage., 16(1), 57–64.
San Cristóbal, J. R. (2012). “Contractor selection using multicriteria decision-making methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 751–758.
Sarker, B. R., Egbelu, P. J., Liao, T. W., and Yu, J. F. (2012). “Planning and design models for construction industry: A critical survey.” Autom. Constr., 22, 123–134.
Singh, D., and Tiong, R. L. K. (2005). “A fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 62–70.
Singh, D., and Tiong, R. L. K. (2006). “Contractor selection criteria: Investigations of opinions of Singapore construction practitioners.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 998–1008.
Taipei City Government. (2009a). “Ebook: Smooth roads project in Taipei.” 〈http://www.nco.taipei.gov.tw/public/MMO/NCP/ebook2/index.html〉 (Sep. 10, 2014) (in Chinese).
Taipei City Government. (2009b). “Introduction to smooth roads project in Taipei.” 〈http://ncp.tcg.gov.tw/webpage/templates/road/road.html〉 (Sep. 10, 2014) (in Chinese).
Taipei City Government. (2013). “Review guidelines for the tender of road renewal work project using the LTDQ.” (in Chinese).
Toh, T. C., Ting, C., Ali, K. N., Aliagha, G. U., and Munir, O. (2012). “Critical cost factors of building construction project in Malaysia.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 57, 360–367.
Wang, W. C., Yu, W. D., Yang, I. T., Lin, C. C., Lee, M. T., and Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). “Applying the AHP to support the best-value contractor selection—Lessons learned from two case studies in Taiwan.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage., 19(1), 24–36.
Wright, J. L. (2000). “Best value in source selections.” Air Force J. Logistics, 24(2), 27–33.
Yang, S. R., Chang, J. R., Lin, H. M., and Lin, K. H. (2015). “Identification of manholes beneath pavements using RFID and AR technologies.” J. Test. Eval., 43(2), 472–478.
Yasamis, F., Arditi, D., and Mohammadi, J. (2002). “Assessing contractor quality performance.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 20(3), 211–223.
Yasamis-Speroni, F., Lee, D. E., and Arditi, D. (2012). “Evaluating the quality performance of pavement contractors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1114–1124.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30Issue 3June 2016

History

Received: Nov 23, 2014
Accepted: May 4, 2015
Published online: Jun 18, 2015
Discussion open until: Nov 18, 2015
Published in print: Jun 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jia-Ruey Chang [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Leisure Industry and Health Promotion, National Ilan Univ., No. 1, Section 1, Shen-Lung Rd., I-Lan, Taiwan 26047, ROC. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share