Deterministic and Probabilistic Lifecycle Cost Assessment: Applications to Nebraska Bridges
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30, Issue 2
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to utilize lifecycle cost analysis (LCCA) as a decision-support tool for three commonly encountered decisions in bridge management: bridge deck overlay decisions, expansion joint replacement decisions, and deck widening versus deck replacement decisions. Bridge management systems aim to assess investment decisions and identify the most cost-effective improvement alternatives to ensure the safety and serviceability of bridge networks. To achieve this goal, the recently developed deterioration models and cost data for highway bridges in the state of Nebraska are utilized in conducting LCCA using deterministic and probabilistic approaches. For deck overlay decisions, silica fume overlay, epoxy polymer overlay, and polyester overlay are compared with bare deck with respect to lifecycle cost and structural life. In expansion joint replacement decisions, two alternatives are compared: relocating abutment expansion joints at the grade beam and replacing abutment expansion joints at the same place. Deck widening is compared with deck replacement under five different bridge conditions. The results of the analysis indicate that applying an epoxy polymer overlay on bare deck with a condition rating of 7 is the most cost-effective deck overlay decision, replacing an abutment expansion joint at the same place is more cost-effective than relocating them at the grade beam, and deck widening is significantly more cost-effective than deck replacement in most cases.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (1998). “Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design: Interim technical bulletin.” Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2004a). “Life-cycle cost analysis, RealCost user manual.” Office of Asset Management, Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2004b). “National bridge inspection standards (NBIS).” Office of Asset Management, Washington, DC.
Hatami, A., and Morcous, G. (2011). “Developing deterioration models for Nebraska bridges.”, Nebraska Department of Roads (NDOR), Lincoln, NE.
Hatami, A., and Morcous, G. (2012). “Deterioration models for life-cycle cost analysis of bridge decks in Nebraska.” J. Transp. Res. Rec., 2313(-1), 3–11.
Hatami, A., and Morcous, G. (2013). “Life-cycle assessment of Nebraska bridges.”, Nebraska Dept. of Roads (NDOR), Lincoln, NE.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). (2003). “Bridge life cycle cost analysis.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). (2011). “Long-term performance of polymer concrete for bridge decks.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
USDOT (U.S. Department of Transportation). (2002). “Life-cycle cost analysis primer.” Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Office of Asset Management, Washington, DC.
White House. (2012). “Circular A-94 appendix C.” 〈http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a094/a94_appx-c〉 (Dec. 20, 2012).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 11, 2014
Accepted: Mar 10, 2015
Published online: May 5, 2015
Discussion open until: Oct 5, 2015
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.